Cited by 124Psychedelics and Drug StudiesReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyAlkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology

Naturalistic Use of Mescaline Is Associated with Self-Reported Psychiatric Improvements and Enduring Positive Life Changes

Open access
Agin-Liebes, Gabrielle, Haas, Trevor F., Lancelotta, Rafael, Uthaug, Malin V., Ramaekers, Johannes G., Davis, Alan K.·2021·ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science

Abstract

Abstract Mescaline is a naturally occurring psychoactive alkaloid that has been used as a sacrament by Indigenous populations in spiritual ritual and healing ceremonies for millennia. Despite promising early preliminary research and favorable anecdotal reports, there is limited research investigating mescaline’s psychotherapeutic potential. We administered an anonymous online questionnaire to adults (N = 452) reporting use of mescaline in naturalistic settings about mental health benefits attributed to mescaline. We assessed respondents’ self-reported improvements in depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and alcohol and drug use disorders (AUD and DUD). Of the respondents reporting histories of these clinical conditions, most (68–86%) reported subjective improvement following their most memorable mescaline experience. Respondents who reported an improvement in their psychiatric conditions reported significantly higher ratings of acute psychological factors including mystical-type, psychological insight, and ego dissolution effects compared to those who did not report improvements (Cohen’s d range 0.7 – 1.5). Many respondents (35–50%) rated the mescaline experience as the single or top five most spiritually significant or meaningful experience(s) of their lives. Acute experiences of psychological insight during their mescaline experience were associated with increased odds of reporting improvement in depression, anxiety, AUD and DUD. Additional research is needed to corroborate these preliminary findings and to rigorously examine the efficacy of mescaline for psychiatric treatment in controlled, longitudinal clinical trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsptsci.1c00018

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The findings suggest a potential positive association between mescaline use and alleviation of various mental health symptoms.

    “The findings of this study suggest a potential positive association between mescaline use and the alleviation of various mental health symptoms”
  • In a 2021 international survey of 452 participants, self-reported mescaline use in non-clinical settings was associated with significant improvements in depression (86.0%), anxiety (80.0%), PTSD (76.0%), and AUD (76.0%).

    “A 2021 international survey involving 452 participants explored the impact of mescaline use in non-clinical settings on mental health. Self-reports revealed significant improvements in depression (86.0%), anxiety (80.0%), post-traumatic stress disorder (76.0%) and AUD (76.0%).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Prentiss D. W.; Morgan F. P. (1895) Anhalonium lewinii (Mescal buttons). Therap. 19, 577. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agin-Liebes, G., Haas, T. F., Lancelotta, R., Uthaug, M. V., Ramaekers, J. G., & Davis, A. K.
Affiliations
  • San Francisco General Hospital (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Habituating to Wholeness, LLC , 6500 W 13th Ave, , ,
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Agin-Liebes, Gabrielle
  • Davis, Alan K.
Venue
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
Published
2021-03-23
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
543-552
ISSN
2575-9108 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3137839889
Cited by
124
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 4
FWCI
15.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Steven and Alexandra Cohen Foundation
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32DAA00725, T32DA007250)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology
Keywords
mescaline, psychedelics, naturalistic psychedelic use, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, alcoholism, drug use disorders, mystical experience, psychological insight, ego dissolution, spiritual experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review