Cited by 60Psychedelics and Drug StudiesIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Psychedelic use and intimate partner violence: The role of emotion regulation

Thiessen, Michelle S, Walsh, Zach, Bird, Brian M, Lafrance, Adele·2018·Journal of Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Background Recent evidence suggests that psychedelic use predicts reduced perpetration of intimate partner violence among men involved in the criminal justice system. However, the extent to which this association generalizes to community samples has not been examined, and potential mechanisms underlying this association have not been directly explored. Aims The present study examined the association between lifetime psychedelic use and intimate partner violence among a community sample of men and women. The study also tested the extent to which the associations were mediated by improved emotion regulation. Methods We surveyed 1266 community members aged 16-70 (mean age=22.78, standard deviation =7.71) using an online questionnaire that queried substance use, emotional regulation, and intimate partner violence. Respondents were coded as psychedelic users if they reported one or more instance of using lysergic acid diethylamide and/or psilocybin mushrooms in their lifetime. Results/outcomes: Males reporting any experience using lysergic acid diethylamide and/or psilocybin mushrooms had decreased odds of perpetrating physical violence against their current partner (odds ratio=0.42, p Conclusions/interpretation These findings extend prior research showing a negative relationship between psychedelic use and intimate partner violence, and highlight the potential role of emotion regulation in this association.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269881118771782

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thiessen, M. S., Walsh, Z., Bird, B. M., & Lafrance, A.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • Department of Psychology, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada
Corresponding author
Thiessen, Michelle S
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2018-05-29
Volume
32
Issue
7
Pages
749-755
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W2807286797
Cited by
60
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (F10-04928)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
psychedelic use, intimate partner violence, emotion regulation, lysergic acid diethylamide, psilocybin, mediation, men, women, community sample
MeSH terms
Intimate Partner Violence, Adolescent, Adult, Agaricales, Aged, Emotions, Female, Hallucinogens, Humans, Lysergic Acid Diethylamide, Male, Middle Aged, Psilocybin, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review