Cited by 375Psychedelics and Drug StudiesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Psychological flexibility mediates the relations between acute psychedelic effects and subjective decreases in depression and anxiety

Open access
Davis, Alan K., Barrett, Frederick S., Griffiths, Roland R.·2020·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Abstract

Prior research has shown that acute subjective psychedelic effects are associated with both spontaneous and intended changes in depression and anxiety. Psychedelics are also theorized to produce increases in psychological flexibility, which could explain decreases in depression and anxiety following a psychedelic experience. Therefore, the present cross-sectional survey study sought to examine whether psychological flexibility mediated the relationship between acute psychedelic experiences and spontaneous or intended changes in depression and anxiety among a large international sample of people who reported having used a psychedelic (n=985; male=71.6%; Caucasian/white=84.1%; M age=32.2, SD=12.6). A regression analysis showed that acute effects (i.e., mystical and insightful effects) were significantly associated with decreases in depression/anxiety following a psychedelic experience. A path analysis revealed that, while controlling for age and sex, increases in psychological flexibility fully mediated the effect of mystical and insightful experiences on decreases in depression and anxiety following a psychedelic experience. This suggests that psychological flexibility may be an important mediator of the therapeutic effects of psychedelic drugs. Future prospective experimental studies should examine the effect of psychedelic drug administration on psychological flexibility in order to gain a better understanding of the psychological processes that predict therapeutic effects of psychedelics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.11.004

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two relevant studies used cross-sectional designs, which prevent analysis of process-level psychedelic changes and may be affected by retrospective bias.

    “First, two of the relevant studies used cross-sectional designs that inherently preclude analysis of process-level psychedelic changes and may be impacted by retrospective bias (Davis et al., 2020; Thiessen et al., 2018).”

    From Prospective examination of the therapeutic role of psychological flexibility and cognitive reappraisal in the ceremonial use of ayahuasca (2022) · cites this paper as Davis et al., 2020

    The Method (Procedure; page unavailable) identifies this as a cross-sectional survey, and the Discussion (page unavailable) says retrospective reports may be biased by current affect and personality. The claim that this design precludes analysis of process-level changes is too absolute: the Method (Data Analyses; page unavailable) describes analyses of reported changes in psychological flexibility and a mediation model, though the study did not observe changes as they occurred. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent prospective studies indicate psychological flexibility is a key component in outcomes following psychedelic use.

    “A few recent studies, including three prospective studies, have suggested that psychological flexibility is a key component in psychedelic-induced outcomes (Close et al., 2020; Davis et al., 2020; Zeifman et al., 2020).”

    From Prospective examination of the therapeutic role of psychological flexibility and cognitive reappraisal in the ceremonial use of ayahuasca (2022) · cites this paper as Davis et al., 2020

    The Abstract reports that increases in psychological flexibility mediated the association between acute psychedelic experiences and reported decreases in depression and anxiety, supporting its suggested role in outcomes. But it explicitly calls this a cross-sectional survey study and recommends future prospective studies; this source is not one of the prospective studies described in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These therapies are proposed to work by stimulating psychological flexibility, reducing emotional avoidance, and increasing approach-oriented coping.

    “It has been proposed that they exert their effects through the stimulation of psychological flexibility processes that decrease emotional avoidance and increase approach-oriented emotional coping (Davis et al., 2020; Kashdan et al., 2020; Zeifman et al., 2020)”

    From Prospective examination of the therapeutic role of psychological flexibility and cognitive reappraisal in the ceremonial use of ayahuasca (2022) · cites this paper as Davis et al., 2020

    The Introduction proposes that psychedelic experiences may increase psychological flexibility and thereby help explain therapeutic effects. The Discussion links psychedelics to acceptance and committed behavior change, but our copy does not specifically say that the proposed pathway decreases emotional avoidance or increases approach-oriented emotional coping. No page numbers are available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Much research has indicated an association between the characteristic psychedelic experience and a positive effect on the symptomatology of several psychiatric illnesses.

    “Assessing the subjective effects of psychedelics is essential since much research has indicated an association between the characteristic psychedelic experience and a positive effect on the symptomatology of several psychiatric illnesses.”

    From Assessment of the acute subjective psychedelic experience: A review of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research on classical psychedelics (2024) · cites this paper as Davis et al., 2020

    The Introduction reports that studies found decreases in anxiety and depression symptoms and says beneficial effects appear associated with the intensity of acute experiences such as mystical phenomena and psychological insight. It does not establish that this association holds across several psychiatric illnesses beyond anxiety and depression. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Two retrospective survey studies suggest that increased psychological flexibility might mediate the therapeutic effects of the quality of the psychedelic experience on depression and anxiety and of psychedelic therapy on alcohol consumption and posttraumatic stress symptoms.

    “Two retrospective survey studies suggest that increased psychological flexibility might mediate the therapeutic effects of the quality of the psychedelic experience on depression and anxiety on the one hand [59] and of psychedelic therapy on alcohol consumption and posttraumatic stress symptoms on the other hand [60].”

    From Psilocybin-assisted therapy for severe alcohol use disorder: protocol for a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 7-month parallel-group phase II superiority trial (2024) · cites this paper as [59]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, & Wilson KG (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  2. Muthén LK and Muthén BO 1998-2017 Mplus User’s Guide. Eighth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, A. K., Barrett, F. S., & Griffiths, R. R.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Davis, Alan K.
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
15
Pages
39-45
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2987203272
Cited by
375
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 19
FWCI
33.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
psychological flexibility, psychedelics, depression, anxiety, mystical experience, insight, mediating effect, psychedelic therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review