Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 649

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 191 of the 191 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Artificial Receptors for the Recognition of Phosphorylated Molecules

Open access
Hargrove, Amanda E., Nieto, Sonia, Zhang, Tianzhi, Sessler, Jonathan L., Anslyn, Eric V.·2011·Chemical Reviews
DOI 10.1021/cr100242s
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVReviewNEXTArtificial Receptors for the Recognition of Phosphorylated MoleculesAmanda E. Hargrove†, Sonia Nieto‡, Tianzhi Zhang§, Jonathan L. Sessler*†∥, and Eric V. Anslyn*†View Author Information† Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station A5300, Austin, Texas 78712-0165, United States‡ Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain§ Henkel Corporation, Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067∥ Department of Chemistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, 120-749 KoreaTelephone: +1-512-471-5009 (J.L.S); +1-512- 471-0068 (E.V.A.). Fax: +1-512-471-7550. E-mail: [email protected] and [email protected]Cite this: Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 11, 6603–6782Publication Date (Web):September 12, 2011Publication History Received29 July 2010Published online12 September 2011Published inissue 9 November 2011https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cr100242shttps://doi.org/10.1021/cr100242sreview-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2011 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views13200Altmetric-Citations564LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Anions,Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy,Phosphates,Receptors,Salts Get e-Alerts

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/cr100242s

Cites

191 of 191 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 649

Metadata

Authors
Hargrove, A. E., Nieto, S., Zhang, T., Sessler, J. L., & Anslyn, E. V.
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2011-09-12
Volume
111
Issue
11
Pages
6603-6782
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
DOI
10.1021/cr100242s
OpenAlex
W2060194158
Cited by
649
References
191
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.