Cited by 76Climate Change Policy and EconomicsBioenergy crop production and managementBioeconomy and Sustainability Development

Economic and ecological views on climate change mitigation with bioenergy and negative emissions

Open access
Creutzig, Felix·2016·GCB Bioenergy

Abstract

Climate stabilization scenarios emphasize the importance of land‐based mitigation to achieve ambitious mitigation goals. The stabilization scenarios informing the recent IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report suggest that bioenergy could contribute anywhere between 10 and 245 EJ to climate change mitigation in 2100. High deployment of bioenergy with low life cycle GHG emissions would enable ambitious climate stabilization futures and reduce demands on other sectors and options. Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) would even enable so‐called negative emissions, possibly in the order of magnitude of 50% of today's annual gross emissions. Here, I discuss key assumptions that differ between economic and ecological perspectives. I find that high future yield assumptions, plausible in stabilization scenarios, look less realistic when evaluated in biophysical metrics. Yield assumptions also determine the magnitude of counterfactual land carbon stock development and partially determine the potential of BECCS. High fertilizer input required for high yields would likely hasten ecosystem degradation. I conclude that land‐based mitigation strategies remain highly speculative; a constant iteration between synoptic integrated assessment models and more particularistic and fine‐grained approaches is a crucial precondition for capturing complex dynamics and biophysical constraints that are essential for comprehensive assessments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/gcbb.12235

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bruinsma J (2009) The resource outlook to 2050: By how much do land, water and crop yields need to increase by 2050? In: How to Feed the World in 2050. Proceedings of a Technical Meeting of Experts, Rome, Italy, 24-26 June 2009, pp. 1-33. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome.
  2. Smith P, Bustamente M, Ahammad H et al. (2014) Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contri- bution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schl€ omer S, vonStechow C, Zwickel T, Minx J). Cambridge Univer- sity Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Creutzig, F.
Affiliations
Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change (DE)
Corresponding author
Creutzig, Felix
Venue
GCB Bioenergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-12-22
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
4-10
ISSN
  • 1757-1693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-1707
OpenAlex
W2104701974
Cited by
76
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • GCB Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Keywords
climate change mitigation, bioenergy, carbon dioxide removal, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, fertilizer inputs, ecosystem degradation, biophysical constraints, integrated assessment models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review