Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 336

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Controlled Gas Uptake in Metal–Organic Frameworks with Record Ammonia Sorption

Rieth, Adam J., Dincă, Mircea·2018·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Ammonia is a vital commodity in our food supply chain, but its toxicity and corrosiveness require advanced protection and mitigation. These needs are not met efficiently by current materials, which suffer from either low capacity or low affinity for NH 3 . Here, we report that a series of microporous triazolate metal–organic frameworks containing open metal sites exhibit record static and dynamic ammonia capacities. Under equilibrium conditions at 1 bar, the materials adsorb up to 19.79 mmol NH 3 g –1, more than twice the capacity of activated carbon, the industry standard. Under conditions relevant to personal protection equipment, capacities reach 8.56 mmol g –1, 27% greater than the previous best material. Structure–function relationships and kinetic analyses of NH 3 uptake in isostructural micro- and mesoporous materials made from Co, Ni, and Cu reveal stability trends that are in line with the water substitution rates in simple metal–aquo complexes. Altogether, these results provide clear, intuitive descriptors that govern the static and dynamic uptake, kinetics, and stability of MOF sorbents for strongly interacting gases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.8b00313

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 336

Metadata

Authors
Rieth, A. J., & Dincă, M.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2018-02-09
Volume
140
Issue
9
Pages
3461-3466
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2788765414
Cited by
336
References
42
FWCI
13.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.