Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Defining the Proton Topology of the Zr6-Based Metal–Organic Framework NU-1000

Planas, Nora, Mondloch, Joseph E., Tussupbayev, Samat, Borycz, Joshua, Gagliardi, Laura, Hupp, Joseph T., Farha, Omar K., Cramer, Christopher J.·2014·The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) constructed from Zr6-based nodes have recently received considerable attention given their exceptional thermal, chemical, and mechanical stability. Because of this, the structural diversity of Zr6-based MOFs has expanded considerably and in turn given rise to difficulty in their precise characterization. In particular it has been difficult to assign where protons (needed for charge balance) reside on some Zr6-based nodes. Elucidating the precise proton topologies in Zr6-based MOFs will have wide ranging implications in defining their chemical reactivity, acid/base characteristics, conductivity, and chemical catalysis. Here we have used a combined quantum mechanical and experimental approach to elucidate the precise proton topology of the Zr6-based framework NU-1000. Our data indicate that a mixed node topology, [Zr6(μ3-O)4(μ3-OH)4(OH)4 (OH2)4](8+), is preferred and simultaneously rule out five alternative node topologies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jz501899j

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
Planas, N., Mondloch, J. E., Tussupbayev, S., Borycz, J., Gagliardi, L., Hupp, J. T., Farha, O. K., & Cramer, C. J.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
Published
2014-10-15
Volume
5
Issue
21
Pages
3716-3723
ISSN
1948-7185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2335314823
Cited by
287
References
40
FWCI
12.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.