Cited by 206Modular Robots and Swarm IntelligenceDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsControl and Dynamics of Mobile Robots

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Collaboration Through the Exploitation of Local Interactions in Autonomous Collective Robotics: The Stick Pulling Experiment

Open access

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1011227210047

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The design of any human-swarm interaction solution will require an understanding of the psychological effects induced on humans who interact with a robot swarm in order to favor interaction modalities that reduce stress and improve usability and trust.

    “The design of any HSI solution will also require an understanding of the psychological effects induced on humans who interact with a robot swarm in order to favor interaction modalities that reduce stress [111], [112] and improve usability and trust [113].”

    From Swarm Robotics: Past, Present, and Future [Point of View] (2021) · cites this paper as [112]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Beni, G. and Wang, J. 1989. Swarm intelligence. In Proc. of the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Robotics Society of Japan, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 425-428.
  2. Humberstone, C.K. and Smith, K.B. 2000. Object transport using multiple mobile robots wth pin joint endeffectors. In Proc. of the Fifth Int. Symp. on Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems, DARS-00, Knoxville, TN, L.E. Parker, G. Bekey, and J. Barhen (Eds.), Springer Verlag: Berlin, pp. 417-426.
  3. Martinoli, A. 1999. Swarm intelligence in autonomous collective robotics: From tools to the analysis and synthesis of distributed control strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ph.D. Thesis No 2069, EPFL.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ijspeert, A. J., Martinoli, A., Billard, A., & Gambardella, L. M.
Affiliations
  • Dalle Molle Institute for Artificial Intelligence Research (CH)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Venue
Autonomous Robots
Published
2001-09
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
149-171
ISSN
  • 0929-5593 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7527
OpenAlex
W2126361298
Cited by
204
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
34.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autonomous Robots (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
Keywords
collective robotics, robot collaboration, local interactions, Khepera robot, Webots simulation, reactive robots, cooperative manipulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review