Cited by 55Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of a New Self-Efficacy Scale and Its Relationship to Treatment Outcome in Social Anxiety Disorder

Gaudiano, Brandon A., Herbert, James D.·2003·Cognitive Therapy and Research

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1026355004548

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1987). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
  2. Becker, R. A. (1988). Self-efficacy scale. In M. Hersen & A. S. Bellack (Eds.), Dictionary of behavioral assessment techniques(pp. 397-398). New York: Pergamon.
  3. First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1995). Structured Clinical Interview for Axis I DSM-IV Disorders—Patient Edition (SCID-I/P, version 2.0). New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research Department.
  4. Foa, E. B., Herbert, J. D., & Bellack, A. S. (1995). Behavior therapy manual for social phobia. Unpublished manuscript, Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
  5. Franklin, M. E., Jaycox, L. H., & Foa, E. B. (1999). Social phobia: Social skills training. In M. Hersen & A. Bellack (Eds.), Handbook of comparative interventions for adult disorders(2nd ed., pp. 317-339). New York: Wiley.
  6. Heimberg, R. G., & Juster, H. R. (1995). Cognitive–behavioral treatments: Literature review. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment(pp. 261-309). New York: Guilford.
  7. Pajares, F. (1997). Current directions in self-efficacy research. In M. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement(Vol. 10, pp. 1-49). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  8. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1989). Assessment of performance-related and general control and competence beliefs. In G. Krampen (Ed.), Diagnostik von Attributionem and Kontrolluberzeugungen [German](pp. 127-133). Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
  9. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1992). Advances in anxiety theory: A cognitive process approach. In K. A. Hagtvet & T. B. Johnsen (Eds.), Advances in test anxiety research(Vol. 7, pp. 2-17). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitliger.
  10. Stravynski, A., & Amado, D. (2001). Social phobia as a deficit in social skills. In S. G. Hofmann & P. M. Di Bartolo (Eds.), From social anxiety to social phobia: Multiple perspectives(pp. 107-129). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gaudiano, B. A., & Herbert, J. D.
Affiliations
Drexel University (US)
Corresponding author
Gaudiano, Brandon A.
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2003-10
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
537-555
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
OpenAlex
W2100031475
Cited by
54
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
self-efficacy, social anxiety disorder, psychometric properties, reliability and validity, treatment outcomes, social anxiety symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review