Cited by 216Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCognitive Functions and MemoryCognitive Abilities and Testing

“Mind the Trap”: Mindfulness Practice Reduces Cognitive Rigidity

Open access
Greenberg, Jonathan, Reiner, Keren, Meiran, Nachshon·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Two experiments examined the relation between mindfulness practice and cognitive rigidity by using a variation of the Einstellung water jar task. Participants were required to use three hypothetical jars to obtain a specific amount of water. Initial problems were solvable by the same complex formula, but in later problems ("critical" or "trap" problems) solving was possible by an additional much simpler formula. A rigidity score was compiled through perseverance of the complex formula. In Experiment 1, experienced mindfulness meditators received significantly lower rigidity scores than non-meditators who had registered for their first meditation retreat. Similar results were obtained in randomized controlled Experiment 2 comparing non-meditators who underwent an eight meeting mindfulness program with a waiting list group. The authors conclude that mindfulness meditation reduces cognitive rigidity via the tendency to be "blinded" by experience. Results are discussed in light of the benefits of mindfulness practice regarding a reduced tendency to overlook novel and adaptive ways of responding due to past experience, both in and out of the clinical setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0036206

Cites

67 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The anti-depressive and anxiolytic effects of mindfulness are thought to be mediated by enhancements in decentring and cognitive flexibility.

    “These anti-depressive and anxiolytic effects are thought to in turn be mediated by enhancements in decentring and cognitive flexibility, in the case of mindfulness intervention (16, 19), vs. mystical experiences and disrupted cortical connectivity in the case of psychedelic-assisted therapy (49, 50).”

    From Examining the Potential Synergistic Effects Between Mindfulness Training and Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy (2021) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Introduction says mindfulness interventions can alleviate symptoms associated with recurrent depression and generalized anxiety, and suggests that reduced rigidity may mediate their efficacy. The Discussion likewise tentatively links reduced rigid thinking to treatment efficacy. Our copy does not identify decentring as a mediator, so it supports only the cognitive-flexibility part of the attributed explanation. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies of other MBIs in healthy participants indicate improvements in working memory, cognitive flexibility, and inhibition, with very limited evidence for attentional improvements.

    “Studies examining other MBIs with healthy participants similarly indicated improvements in cognitive abilities such as working memory (76–77), cognitive flexibility (78–79) and inhibition (80), with very limited evidence regarding attentional improvements (see (73) for a review).”

    From Mindfulness-Based Interventions in Psychiatry (2018) · cites this paper as [77]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [3]Nelson TS 2002 If you reframe it, they will come. Anonymous Clinical epiphanies in marital and family therapy: A practitioner’s casebook of therapeutic insights, perceptions, and breakthroughs New York, NY, US: Haworth Press 50 57
  2. [54]Wenk-Sormaz H 2005 Meditation can reduce habitual responding. Adv Mind Body 20671347

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greenberg, J., Reiner, K., & Meiran, N.
Affiliations
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
Corresponding author
Greenberg, Jonathan
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-05-15
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
e36206
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026631848
Cited by
214
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 1
FWCI
14.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Israel Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
mindfulness meditation, cognitive rigidity, Einstellung effect, problem solving, meditation retreats, cognitive flexibility
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review