Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 20

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Moving Towards Transformative Democratic Action Through Archaeology

Wood, Margaret C.·2002·International Journal of Historical Archaeology
DOI 10.1023/a:1020385120291
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1020385120291

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Bond, G. C., and Gilliam, A. (eds.) (1994). Social Constructions of the Past: Representation as Power, Vol. 24, Routledge, New York.
  2. Conkey, M. W. (1991). Does it make a difference? Feminist thinking and archaeologies of gender. In Walde, D., and Willows, N. D. (eds.), The Archaeology of Gender, The Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary, Calgary, pp. 24–34.
  3. Conkey, M. W., and Tringham, R. E. (1996). Cultivating thinking/challenging authority: Some experiments in feminist pedagogy in archaeology. In Wright, R. P. (ed.), Gender and Archaeology, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 224–250.
  4. Duke, P., and Saitta, D. J. (1998). An emancipatory archaeology for the working class. Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for American Archaeology, Seattle, 1998.
  5. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Continuum, New York.
  6. Leone, M. P. (1986). Symbolic, structural and critical archaeology. In Meltzer, D. J., Fowler, D. D., and Sabloff, J. A. (eds.), American Archaeology Past and Future, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  7. Levine, M. A. (1991). An historical overview of research on women in anthropology. In Walde, D., and Willows, N. D. (eds.), The Archaeology of Gender, The Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary, Calgary, pp. 177–186.
  8. McDavid, C., and Babson, D.W. (eds.) (1997). In the realm of politics: Prospects for public participation in African-American and plantation archaeology. Historical Archaeology 31
  9. Orser, C. E. (1988). Toward a theory of power for historical archaeology: Plantations and space. In Leone, M., and Potter, P., Jr. (eds.), Recovery of Meaning, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 235–262.
  10. Paynter, R. W. (1982). Models of Spatial Inequality, Academic Press, New York.
  11. Scott, E. (1997). Introduction: On the incompleteness of archaeological narratives. In Moore, J., and Scott E. (eds.), Invisible People and Process: Writing Gender and Childhood Into European Archaeology, Leicester University Press, London, pp. 2–11.
  12. Tilley, C. (1989). Archaeology as socio-political action in the present. In Pinsky, V., and Wylie, A. (eds.), Critical Traditions in Contemporary Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 104–116.
  13. Trigger, B. G. (1986). Prehistoric archaeology and American society. In Meltzer, D. J., Fowler, D. D., and Sabloff, J. A. (eds.), American Archaeology Past and Future, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 135–162.
  14. Trigger, B. G. (1989). A History of Archaeological Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
  15. Wurst, L., and McGuire, R. (1998). No one acts alone: A critique of individualism in archaeological theory. Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the Society of American Archaeology, Seattle, 1998.
  16. Wylie, A. (1989). Introduction: Socio-political context. In Pinsky, V., and Wylie, A. (eds.), Critical Traditions in Contemporary Archaeology: Essays in the philosophy, history, and socio-politics of rchaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, pp. 93–95.
  17. Wylie, A. (1991). Gender theory and the archaeological record: Why is there no archaeology of gender? In Gero, J. M., and Conkey, M. W. (eds.), Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, Blackwell, Cambridge, pp. 31–56.

Cited by

See all 20

Metadata

Authors
Wood, M. C.
Venue
International Journal of Historical Archaeology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2002-09
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
187-198
ISSN
  • 1092-7697
  • 1573-7748
DOI
10.1023/a:1020385120291
Cited by
20
References
27
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.