Cited by 27Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasECG Monitoring and AnalysisCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Utility of patient-activated cardiac event recorders in the detection of cardiac arrhythmias

Wu, Chih-Cheng, Hsieh, Ming-Hsiung, Tai, Ching-Tai, Chiang, Chern-En, Yu, Wen-Chung, Lin, Yung-Kuo, Tsao, Hsuan-Ming, Ding, Phillip Yu-An +1 more·2003·Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

Abstract

Background Patient-activated event recorders are useful for the diagnosis of arrhythmia in patients with palpitation and presyncope. However, the utility of event recorders in patients suspected of arrhythmia but presenting with other symptoms is not clear. Furthermore, the factors influencing their utility have not been evaluated.Methods Event recorder reports of six hundred and sixty consecutive patients referred due to clinical suspicion of cardiac arrhythmia were reviewed. We divided symptoms into four groups: palpitation, presyncope, chest tightness, and dyspnea. We calculated the diagnostic yield according to patients' symptoms reported on the record, and analyzed the factors affecting the utility of event recorders.Results The overall diagnostic yield was 64%, and those of palpitation, presyncope, chest tightness, and dyspnea were 66%, 57%, 51% and 60%, respectively. The most common five findings in our patients were sinus rhythm (36%), sinus tachycardia (30%), atrial premature complex (14%), ventricular premature complex (12%), and atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (7%). The recording duration (8 +/- 4 days) was short in the present study, but the overall diagnostic yield was similar to those of previous ones. Women had lower diagnostic yields than men, especially in atrial flutter-fibrillation. The diagnostic yield was not influenced by age, ordered doctors, or history of cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS; Patient-activated event recorders provided a good diagnostic yield in patients with different presentations of cardiac arrhythmia, and women had lower diagnostic yield in atrial flutter-fibrillation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1023604816368

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, C.-C., Hsieh, M.-H., Tai, C.-T., Chiang, C.-E., Yu, W.-C., Lin, Y.-K., Tsao, H.-M., Ding, P. Y.-A., & Chen, S.-A.
Affiliations
Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
Hsieh, Ming-Hsiung
Venue
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Published
2003-04
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
117-120
ISSN
  • 1383-875X (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8595
OpenAlex
W1522788271
Cited by
27
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Keywords
cardiac arrhythmias, diagnostic yield, palpitations, presyncope, chest tightness, dyspnea, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, sinus tachycardia, premature atrial contractions, premature ventricular contractions, sex differences, recording duration
MeSH terms
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Dyspnea, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Syncope, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review