CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,198Higher Education Research StudiesHigher Education Practises and EngagementService-Learning and Community Engagement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adding Value: Learning Communities and Student Engagement

Open access
Zhao, Chun-Mei, Kuh, George D.·2004·Research in Higher Education
DOI 10.1023/b:rihe.0000015692.88534.de
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:rihe.0000015692.88534.de

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Learning community participation is positively associated with student engagement outcomes such as academic effort, academic integration, and collaborative learning.

    “Learning community participation was positively associated with a number of outcomes related to student engagement, such as academic effort, academic integration, and collaborative learning.”

    From Success with EASE: Who benefits from a STEM learning community? (2019) · cites this paper as Zhao and Kuh [26]

  • Learning community participants are more likely to interact with faculty members than non-participants.

    “Learning community participants were also more likely to interact with faculty members.”

    From Success with EASE: Who benefits from a STEM learning community? (2019) · cites this paper as [26]

  • First-year students who participate in learning communities have higher grades, retention rates, and self-reported levels of engagement than peers who have not had a learning community experience.

    “Prior research has documented that first-year students who participate in learning communities have higher grades, retention rates, and self-reported levels of engagement than their peers who have not had a learning community experience.”

    From Success with EASE: Who benefits from a STEM learning community? (2019) · cites this paper as [26]

  • Students in learning communities report being more satisfied with their college experience than students who did not participate in learning communities.

    “students in learning communities reported being more satisfied with their college experience as compared to students who did not participate in learning communities.”

    From Success with EASE: Who benefits from a STEM learning community? (2019) · cites this paper as [26]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Baxter-Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and Reasoning in College: Gender-Role Patterns in Students' Intellectual Development, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
  2. Chickering, A. W., and Reisser, L. (1993). Education andIdentity, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
  3. Education Commission of the States (1995). Making Quality Count in Undergraduate Education, Education Commission of the States, Denver, CO.
  4. Gabelnick, F., MacGregor, J., Matthews, R., and Smith, B. L. (1990). Learning Communities, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
  5. Kuh, G. D., Hayek, J. C., Carini, R. M., Ouimet, J. A., Gonyea, R. M., and Kennedy, J. (2001). NSSE Technical and Norms Report, Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning, Bloomington.
  6. MacGregor, J. (1991). What differences do learning communities make? Washington Center News 6: 4-9.
  7. McGuen, S., and Others. (1996). Beacon PAL: Peer-assisted learning project update. New Beacon College Outcome Research Briefs No. 11, American River College, Office of Research and Development, Sacramento, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 393517)
  8. Menard, S. (1995). Applied Logistics Regression Analysis (2nd Ed.), Sage, Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi.
  9. Pascarella, E. T., Terenzini, P. T., and Blimling, G. S. (1994). The impact of residential life on students. In: Schroeder, C. C., and Mable, P. (eds.), Realizing the Educational Potential of Residence Halls, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 22-52.
  10. Piaget, J. (1964). Judgment and Reasoning in a Child, Littlefield, Adams, Totowa, NJ.
  11. Pike, G. R. (2000). Assessment measures: Methodological issues in the assessment of learning communities. Assessment Update 12(2): 14-15.
  12. Slavin, R. E. (1983). Cooperative Learning, Longman, New York.
  13. Study Group on the Conditions of Excellence in American Higher Education (1984). Involvement in Learning: Realizing the Potential of American Higher Education, U.S. Dept. of Education, National Institute of Education, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED246883)
  14. Tinto, V. (1997). Colleges as communities: Exploring the education character of student persistence. Journal of Higher Education 68(6): 599-623.
  15. Vogt, W. P. (1997). Tolerance and Education: Learning to Live with Diversity and Difference, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  16. Whipple, W. R. (1987). Collaborative learning. AAHE Bulletin 40(2): 3-7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, C.-M., & Kuh, G. D.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Chun-Mei
Venue
Research in Higher Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2004-03
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
115-138
ISSN
  • 0361-0365 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-188X
DOI
10.1023/b:rihe.0000015692.88534.de
OpenAlex
W2132790577
Cited by
1,198
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 106 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 86 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 89 · 2014: 91 · 2013: 74 · 2012: 67
FWCI
88.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Research in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Service-Learning and Community Engagement
Keywords
learning communities, student engagement, first-year students, senior students, student satisfaction, four-year colleges

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review