Cited by 272Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How Fading Worked Solution Steps Works – A Cognitive Load Perspective

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:truc.0000021815.74806.f6

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Atkinson, R.K., Derry, S.J., Renkl, A. & Wortham, D.W. (2000) Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research, Review of Educational Research 70: 181–214. · DOI
  2. Atkinson, R.K., Renkl, A. & Merrill, M.M. (in press) Transitioning from studying examples to solving problems: Effects of self-explanation prompts and fading, Journal of Educational Psychology.
  3. Catrambone, R. & Holyoak, K.J. (1989) Overcoming contextual limitations on problemsolving transfer, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15: 1147–1156.
  4. Ericsson, K.A. & Simon, H.A. (1993) Protocol Analysis. Verbal Reports as Data (revised edition). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Fleischman, E.S. & Jones, R.M. (2002) Why example fading works: A qualitative analysis using Cascade, Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 298–303. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  6. Hausmann, R.G.M. & Chi, M.T.H. (2002) Can a computer interface support self-explaining? Cognitive Technology 7: 4–14.
  7. Jones, R.M. & Fleischman, E.S. (2001) CASCADE explains and informs the utility of fading examples to problems, Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 459–464. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  8. Kintsch, W. (1986) Learning from text, Cognition and Instruction 3: 87–108. · DOI
  9. Renkl, A. (1997) Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences, Cognitive Science 21: 1–29.
  10. Renkl, A., Atkinson, R.K., Maier, U.H. & Staley, R. (2002) From example study to problem solving: Smooth transitions help learning, Journal of Experimental Education 70: 293–315. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Renkl, A., Gruber, H., Weber, S., Lerche, T. & Schweizer, K. (2003) Cognitive Load beim Lernen aus Lösungsbeispielen [Cognitive load during learning from worked-out examples], Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 17: 93–101. · DOI
  12. Renkl, A., Stark, R., Gruber, H. & Mandl, H. (1998) Learning from worked-out examples: The effects of example variability and elicited self-explanations, Contemporary Educational Psychology 23: 90–108. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Sweller, J. & Cooper, G.A. (1985) The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra, Cognition and Instruction 2: 59–89. · DOI · Paper page
  14. VanLehn, K. (1996) Cognitive skill acquisition, Annual Review of Psychology 47: 513–539. · DOI
  15. VanLehn, K. (1998) Analogy events: How examples are used during problem solving, Cognitive Science 22: 347–388. · DOI
  16. VanLehn, K. (1999) Rule-learning events in the acquisition of a complex skill: An evaluation of CASCADE, The Journal of the Learning Sciences 8: 71–125. · DOI · Paper page
  17. VanLehn, K. & Jones, R.M. (1993) Learning by explaining examples to oneself: A computational model. In: S. Chipman & A.L. Meyrowitz (eds), Foundations of Knowledge Acquisition: Cognitive Models of Complex Learning, pp. 25–82. Kluwer Academic Pulishing: Boston, MA. · DOI
  18. VanLehn, K., Jones, R.M. & Chi, M.T. (1992) A model of the self-explanation effect, The Journal of the Learning Sciences 2: 1–59. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (1990) Strategies for programming instruction in high school: Program completion vs. program generation, Journal of Educational Computing Research 6: 265–287. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Renkl, A., Atkinson, R. K., & Große, C. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Renkl, Alexander
Venue
Instructional Science
Published
2004-01
Volume
32
Issue
1-2
Pages
59-82
ISSN
  • 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1952
OpenAlex
W2148119838
Cited by
272
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
17.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Instructional Science (publishedVersion)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
worked examples, cognitive load, self-explanation, computer-based learning environments, think-aloud, skill acquisition, problem solving, learning events

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review