Cited by 123Social and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchNames, Identity, and Discrimination Research

The surprisingly limited malleability of implicit racial evaluations

Joy-Gaba, Jennifer A., Nosek, Brian A.·2010·Social Psychology

Abstract

Implicit preferences for Whites compared to Blacks can be reduced via exposure to admired Black and disliked White individuals ( Dasgupta & Greenwald, 2001 ). In four studies (total N = 4,628), while attempting to clarify the mechanism, we found that implicit preferences for Whites were weaker in the “positive Blacks” exposure condition compared to a control condition (weighted average d = .08). This effect was substantially smaller than the original demonstration ( Dasgupta & Greenwald, 2001 ; d = .82). Factors beyond exposure to admired Blacks may be necessary for the effect, such as making race accessible during exemplar exposure and including negative White exemplars. Our evidence suggests that exposure to known-group members shifts implicit race bias reliably, but weakly.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/1864-9335/a000020

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joy-Gaba, J. A., & Nosek, B. A.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Venue
Social Psychology
Published
2010-01
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
137-146
ISSN
  • 1864-9335 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2590
OpenAlex
W2126718333
Cited by
123
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 14
FWCI
30.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Keywords
implicit racial attitudes, racial bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review