Cited by 15Geological and Geochemical AnalysisGeological and Geophysical StudiesPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 71 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Geochronological Constraints on the Evolution and Petrogenesis of the Malwa Plateau Subprovince of the Deccan Traps

Open access

Abstract

The eruptive history of the Malwa Plateau Subprovince of the Deccan Traps is addressed by dating 21 lavas spanning the exposed stratigraphic extent, using the 40 Ar/ 39 Ar method applied to plagioclase separates. Major, minor, and trace element geochemistry was determined for each of the dated lavas and four additional ones. Dating results indicate that the eruptions began prior to 66.8 Ma, at least 400 ka before the oldest known lava in the more extensively studied Western Ghats, representative of the main Deccan province, to the south. Eruption rates peaked from 66.4 to 66.3 Ma and then diminished until 65.6 Ma. The peak in eruption rates coincides with the well‐documented Late Maastrichtian Warming event. Malwa lavas show some major and trace element affinities with geochemically defined lava flow formations of the Western Ghats, but are generally out of the stratigraphic sequence manifest in the Western Ghats. The distinct geochemical evolution of Malwa Plateau lavas compared with those of the Western Ghats is at least in part a consequence of differences in crustal composition between the two subprovinces. Modeling of REE concentration patterns of Malwa lavas suggests that they were derived by slightly lower degrees of partial melting, at lower mantle temperatures and depths, than those in the Western Ghats. The Malwa Plateau thus appears to record an earlier, cooler stage of the Deccan plume's evolution and continued to erupt through a large part of the lifetime of the main Deccan province.

Overview

CoChat Summary

Written by AI from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

New 40Ar/39Ar plagioclase ages and geochemistry for 25 Malwa Plateau lavas show Deccan volcanism there began by 66.834 ± 0.075 Ma, at least ~400 ka before the oldest dated Western Ghats lavas, peaked at 66.4–66.3 Ma, and continued to 65.6 Ma. Malwa lavas are geochemically distinct from Western Ghats chemotypes, and REE modeling suggests lower-degree, lower-temperature, shallower melting consistent with an earlier, cooler stage of the Deccan plume.

Key findings

  • 40Ar/39Ar dating of 21 lavas spanning the exposed stratigraphic extent shows eruptions began prior to 66.8 Ma; the oldest sample, KI18-1 of the Mandleshwar Formation, gives 66.834 ± 0.075 Ma (1σ analytical), at least 400 ka older than the oldest high-precision Western Ghats age of 66.413 ± 0.067 Ma (Sprain et al., 2019). Exposed southern Malwa lavas span ~700 m elevation and roughly 1 million years, with quasi-continuous eruptions for ~350,000 years leading up to the KPB; eruption rates peaked from 66.4 to 66.3 Ma and then diminished until 65.6 Ma, coinciding with the Late Maastrichtian Warming event.
  • All but one analyzed sample are tholeiitic basalts or basaltic andesites with SiO2 49.3–54.2 wt% on a volatile-free basis; except topmost JNP-813 (TiO2 = 0.99 wt%, FeO = 10.8 wt%, MgO = 6.8 wt%), samples are high in TiO2 (2.3–3.3 wt%) and FeO (10.7–15.7 wt%) and low in MgO (3.8–6.9 wt%). One alkaline trachybasalt, MAL19-2 (66.51 ± 0.28 Ma), has strong LREE/HREE enrichment (La/Lu = 109.6).
  • Discriminant-function analysis returns some Malwa correlations to Western Ghats chemotypes, but many samples do not reliably match any chemotype and several matches are out of stratigraphic order; Khandala chemotypes erupted earlier in Malwa (66.8–66.2 Ma) than in the Western Ghats (66.2–66.1 Ma), while Bushe-like lavas erupted slightly later in Malwa (65.9–65.8 Ma) than in the Western Ghats (66.1–66.0 Ma).
  • REE modeling suggests Malwa lavas were derived by slightly lower degrees of partial melting, at lower mantle temperatures and depths, than Western Ghats lavas; Malwa thus appears to record an earlier, cooler stage of the Deccan plume’s evolution and continued erupting through a large part of the main Deccan province’s lifetime.

Methods

  • Collected 25 lava samples from Malwa Plateau outcrops, predominantly in the southern region; 21 were selected for 40Ar/39Ar dating, and four were unsuitable due to plagioclase inclusions or alteration. Seven plagioclase megacrystic basalts had geochemistry previously presented by Marzoli et al. (2022).
  • 40Ar/39Ar dating used plagioclase separates co-irradiated with Fish Canyon sanidine in four separate 7 hr irradiations in the CLICIT facility of the Oregon State University TRIGA reactor; 4–8 aliquots per sample were analyzed in 12–15 step incremental CO2 laser heating experiments at the Berkeley Geochronology Center using a MAP 215C mass spectrometer. Weighted mean plateau ages are based on the Renne et al. (2011) calibration, and age models were produced with Chron.jl using sample elevations and 2σ weighted mean plateau ages including systematic uncertainties.
  • Whole-rock major and trace element data were obtained on all 25 samples by XRF and ICP-MS at the Washington State University GeoAnalytical Lab; data were compared with Western Ghats chemotypes via discriminant-function analysis in SPSS v.27 following Peng et al. (1998) and Vanderkluysen et al. (2011), and REE patterns were modeled with REEBOX PRO and EC-AFC.

Limitations

  • Stated: the duration of the waxing and waning phases of eruption rate is poorly constrained because of unknown erosion and the undated lava section below the lowest dated flow at the Narmada River; two dated samples (KOL20-1 and SK20-1) cannot be confidently placed in the age model.
  • Stated: current age resolution permits only coarse climate modeling via geochemical box models, and there remains disagreement between pulsed versus quasi-continuous eruptive tempo; intercalibration uncertainties between 40Ar/39Ar and U-Pb dating persist, with offsets depending on whether the Renne et al. (2011) or Kuiper et al. (2008) calibration is used.
  • Evident: sampling is concentrated in the southern Malwa Plateau where sections are least faulted and expose the maximum elevation range; geochemical correlations rely on liberal DFA criteria (Mahalanobis distance <20), and the paper notes that differences in Ti, Zr/Y, and Nb/La cast doubt on almost every correlation. The study also does not directly bear on the pulsed versus quasi-continuous eruptive tempo of the LIP as a whole.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2023gc011137

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 3 Age versus elevation for Malwa Plateau basalt samples. 40 Ar/ 39 Ar ages plotted as a function of elevation, showing age model with 95% confidence region. Uncertainties for data points are 2 σ , excluding systematic sources. Ages and uncertainties (gray bars) for geomagnetic polarity time scale (GPTS) are from Sprain et al. (2018). Magnetic polarity zonation for the Malwa Plateau from Schöbel et al. (2014). Stratigraphy of the Malwa group follows usage by the Geological Survey of India. Vertical purple bar denotes the KPB at 2 σ uncertainty, data taken from Sprain et al., 2015.
Figure 3 Age versus elevation for Malwa Plateau basalt samples. 40 Ar/ 39 Ar ages plotted as a function of elevation, showing age model with 95% confidence region. Uncertainties for data points are 2 σ , excluding systematic sources. Ages and uncertainties (gray bars) for geomagnetic polarity time scale (GPTS) are from Sprain et al. (2018). Magnetic polarity zonation for the Malwa Plateau from Schöbel et al. (2014). Stratigraphy of the Malwa group follows usage by the Geological Survey of India. Vertical purple bar denotes the KPB at 2 σ uncertainty, data taken from Sprain et al., 2015.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 4
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 4 (a) Ba/Nb versus model ages from this study and data from Haase et al. (2019). (b) La/Lu versus model ages from this study and data from Haase et al. (2019). (c) Mg# versus model ages from this study and Haase et al. (2019) (d) Ba/Nb versus ages of Western Ghats samples from Sprain et al. (2019) and model ages from this study.
Figure 4 (a) Ba/Nb versus model ages from this study and data from Haase et al. (2019). (b) La/Lu versus model ages from this study and data from Haase et al. (2019). (c) Mg# versus model ages from this study and Haase et al. (2019) (d) Ba/Nb versus ages of Western Ghats samples from Sprain et al. (2019) and model ages from this study.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 6
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 5 La/Sm versus Sm/Yb using samples from this study and from Haase et al. (2019), and Western Ghat samples reported in Basu et al. (2020). The solid purple and dashed blue curves represent REE trends for melts generated from a primitive anhydrous peridotite mantle at 1550 and 1450°C assuming a lithospheric thickness of 80 km using the REEBOX-PRO software package (Brown & Lesher, 2016). The thick pink line shows the REE variations modeled by energy-constrained recharge, assimilation, and fractional crystallization (EC-AFC) (Spera & Bohrson, 2002). The highest La/ Sm (3.5) of the calculated contaminated magma corresponds to a residual magma fraction of 0.9% and 3% assimilation of an average upper crust (Rudnick & Gao, 2003). The black line (EC-AFC_2) corresponds to the calculated composition of a magma that assimilated a hypothetic crustal rock in which Sm behaves compatibly, while La and Yb are incompatible. Details on the EC-AFC modeling are reported in Supporting Information S1.
Figure 5 La/Sm versus Sm/Yb using samples from this study and from Haase et al. (2019), and Western Ghat samples reported in Basu et al. (2020). The solid purple and dashed blue curves represent REE trends for melts generated from a primitive anhydrous peridotite mantle at 1550 and 1450°C assuming a lithospheric thickness of 80 km using the REEBOX-PRO software package (Brown & Lesher, 2016). The thick pink line shows the REE variations modeled by energy-constrained recharge, assimilation, and fractional crystallization (EC-AFC) (Spera & Bohrson, 2002). The highest La/ Sm (3.5) of the calculated contaminated magma corresponds to a residual magma fraction of 0.9% and 3% assimilation of an average upper crust (Rudnick & Gao, 2003). The black line (EC-AFC_2) corresponds to the calculated composition of a magma that assimilated a hypothetic crustal rock in which Sm behaves compatibly, while La and Yb are incompatible. Details on the EC-AFC modeling are reported in Supporting Information S1.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 8
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 9
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 7 40 Ar/ 39 Ar ages plotted as a function of elevation compared with U-Pb data reported in Eddy et al. (2020). Uncertainties for 40 Ar/ 39 Ar data points (blue) are 2 σ including systematic uncertainties, age model bounds for 40 Ar/ 39 Ar data (blue region) are 95% confidence including systematic uncertainties. Uncertainties for U-Pb data points (red) are the 95% confidence of the youngest grain and include systematic uncertainties. The red region represents the preferred age model interpretation presented by Eddy et al. (2020).
Figure 7 40 Ar/ 39 Ar ages plotted as a function of elevation compared with U-Pb data reported in Eddy et al. (2020). Uncertainties for 40 Ar/ 39 Ar data points (blue) are 2 σ including systematic uncertainties, age model bounds for 40 Ar/ 39 Ar data (blue region) are 95% confidence including systematic uncertainties. Uncertainties for U-Pb data points (red) are the 95% confidence of the youngest grain and include systematic uncertainties. The red region represents the preferred age model interpretation presented by Eddy et al. (2020).CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 11
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 8 40 Ar/ 39 Ar and U-Pb age models plotted as a function of elevation. 40 Ar/ 39 Ar age model results depict 95% confidence intervals including systematic uncertainties for data calibrated to Renne et al. (2011) in teal and Kuiper et al. (2008) in purple. The salmon region represents the preferred age model interpretation presented by Eddy et al. (2020).
Figure 8 40 Ar/ 39 Ar and U-Pb age models plotted as a function of elevation. 40 Ar/ 39 Ar age model results depict 95% confidence intervals including systematic uncertainties for data calibrated to Renne et al. (2011) in teal and Kuiper et al. (2008) in purple. The salmon region represents the preferred age model interpretation presented by Eddy et al. (2020).CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

38 Own result · 30 Own interpretation · 16 No full text of the sources · 13 Check pending · 12 Not checked yet · 4 Sources not found · 2 Own method · 1 No basis given

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 46
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 10

Create a free account to see these claims.

Create a free account to see these assumptions.

59 more claims

Create a free account to see all 116 claims and to verify the 23 references still open.

See all claims — free account

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bhalla M. S., 1974, Low field hysteresis and palaeomagnetic stability criterion of rock samples from Dhar (Deccan traps) India, Journal of Indian Geophysical Union, 12, 14
  2. Kaila K. L., 1988, Deccan flood basalts, Memoir ‐ Geologic Society of India, 91
  3. Khadri S. F. R., 2003, Occurrence of N–R–N sequence in the Malwa Deccan lava flows to the north of Narmada region, Madhya Pradesh, India, Current Science, 85, 1126
  4. Khadri S. F. R., 1994, Magnetostratigraphy of Malwa Deccan Traps Near Mandu Region, Madhya Pradesh, 199
  5. 10.1017/s00167568200011683 · DOI

Cited by

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
Tholt, A. J., Renne, P. R., Marzoli, A., Vanderkluysen, L., Mohabey, D., Samant, B., Dhobale, A., Pande, K., & Self, S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Berkeley Geochronology Center (US)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University (IN)
  • Savitribai Phule Pune University (IN)
  • Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
Corresponding author
Tholt, A. J.
Venue
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Published
2023-12
Volume
24
Issue
12
ISSN
1525-2027 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389903873
Cited by
15
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › Geological and Geophysical Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Keywords
Deccan Traps, 40Ar/39Ar geochronology, plagioclase, eruption rate, Western Ghats, crustal composition, mantle partial melting, rare earth element patterns, mantle temperature, Cretaceous volcanism, lava geochemistry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-12, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-12 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review