Adolescent (in)vulnerability.
Abstract
Three groups of subjects were asked to judge the probability that they and several target others (a friend, an acquaintance, a parent, a child) would experience various risks. Subjects were middle-class adults, their teenage children, and high-risk adolescents from treatment homes. All three groups saw themselves as facing somewhat less risk than the target others. However, this perception of relative invulnerability was no more pronounced for adolescents than for adults. Indeed, the parents were viewed as less vulnerable than their teenage children by both the adults and those teens. These results are consistent with others showing small differences in the cognitive decision-making processes of adolescents and adults. Underestimating teens' competence can mean misdiagnosing the sources of their risk behaviors, denying them deserved freedoms, and failing to provide needed assistance.
Cites (9)
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesTversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1975 · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making
- Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probabilityTversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1973 · Cognitive Psychology
- Unrealistic optimism about future life eventsWeinstein, Neil D. · 1980 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Egocentrism in adolescenceElkind, David · 1967 · Child Development
- “How Probable is Probable? A Numerical Translation of Verbal Probability Expressions.”Beyth‐Marom, Ruth · 1982 · Journal of Forecasting
- Managerial myopia: Self-serving biases in organizational planning.Larwood, Laurie, Whittaker, William · 1977 · Journal of Applied Psychology
- Accident risk and risk-taking behaviour among young driversJonah, Brian A. · 1986 · Accident Analysis & Prevention
- Empirical scaling of common verbal phrases associated with numerical probabilitiesLichtenstein, Sarah, Newman, J. Robert · 1967 · Psychonomic Science
- Stated expectations as functions of probability and desirability of outcomesIRWIN, FRANCIS W. · 1953 · Journal of Personality
Cited by (22)
- Risk as feelings.Loewenstein, George F., Weber, Elke U., Hsee, Christopher K., Welch, Ned · 2001 · Psychological Bulletin
- Flawed Self-Assessment: Implications for Health, Education, and the WorkplaceDunning, David, Heath, Chip, Suls, Jerry M. · 2004 · Psychological Science in the Public Interest
- Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public PolicyReyna, Valerie F., Farley, Frank · 2006 · Psychological Science in the Public Interest
- Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision making.Steinberg, Laurence, Cauffman, Elizabeth · 1996 · Law and Human Behavior
- The development of risk-taking: A multi-perspective reviewBOYER, T · 2006 · Developmental Review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adolescent (in)vulnerability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0003-066x.48.2.102
- The paper
- Quadrel, M. J., Fischhoff, B., & Davis, W. (1993). Adolescent (in)vulnerability. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.48.2.102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.