Cited by 4,601Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research TopicsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 122 of the 123 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications

Clark, Lee Anna, Watson, David·1991·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

We review psychometric and other evidence relevant to mixed anxiety-depression. Properties of anxiety and depression measures, including the convergent and discriminant validity of self- and clinical ratings, and interrater reliability, are examined in patient and normal samples. Results suggest that anxiety and depression can be reliably and validly assessed; moreover, although these disorders share a substantial component of general affective distress, they can be differentiated on the basis of factors specific to each syndrome. We also review evidence for these specific factors, examining the influence of context and scale content on ratings, factor analytic studies, and the role of low positive affect in depression. With these data, we argue for a tripartite structure consisting of general distress, physiological hyperarousal (specific anxiety), and anhedonia (specific depression), and we propose a diagnosis of mixed anxiety-depression.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.100.3.316

Cites

122 of 122 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 123 references

1 of the 123 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4,601

Metadata

Authors
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D.
Affiliations
Southern Methodist University (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
1991-08
Volume
100
Issue
3
Pages
316-336
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2148916146
Cited by
4,601
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 172 · 2025: 173 · 2024: 176 · 2023: 171 · 2022: 204 · 2021: 195 · 2020: 230 · 2019: 182 · 2018: 189 · 2017: 181 · 2016: 176 · 2015: 226 · 2014: 223 · 2013: 195 · 2012: 221
FWCI
37.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
mixed anxiety-depressive disorder, anxiety, depression, tripartite model, anhedonia, hyperarousal, convergent and discriminant validity, inter-rater reliability, factor structure, positive affect, diagnosis
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review