Cited by 6,468Education, Achievement, and GiftednessEducational Environments and Student OutcomesMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.

Ames, Carole·1992·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

This article examines the classroom learning environment in relation to achievement goal theory of motivation. Classroom structures are described in terms of how they make different types of achievement goals salient and as a consequence elicit qualitatively different patterns of motivation. Task, evaluation and recognition, and authority dimensions of classrooms are presented as examples of structures that can influence children's orientation toward different achievement goals. Central to the thesis of this article is a perspective that argues for an identification of classroom structures that can contribute to a mastery orientation, a systematic analysis of these structures, and a determination of how these structures relate to each other

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ames claimed that the normative aspect of grading is responsible for generating the ego-oriented focus on ability.

    “Later Ames (1992) claimed that the normative aspect of grading is responsible for generating the ego-oriented focus on ability.”
  • Achievement goal theory has consistently argued that grades engender a performance focus.

    “the relatively long tradition of achievement goal theory (Ames, 1992; Butler, 1987; Nicholls, 1984) has consistently argued that grades engender a performance focus”
  • Mastery goals promote intrinsic motivation and a deeper understanding of the material, leading to long-term academic success.

    “Mastery goals promote intrinsic motivation and a deeper understanding of the material, leading to long-term academic success (Ames 1992;Bieg, Reindl, and Dresel 2017;Huang 2011;Katz-Vago and Benita 2024;Matos et al. 2017).”
  • From a self-determination theory perspective, teachers can influence their students' motivation by supporting or thwarting basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness.

    “From a self-determination theory perspective, teachers can influence their students’ motivation by supporting or thwarting basic psychological needs for: (i) Autonomy, the need to experience one’s behavior as self-endorsed or volitional; (ii) Competence, the need to effectively interact with one’s environment and achieve positive outcomes; and (iii) Relatedness, the need to feel supported and con”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 90 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ames, C.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Ames, Carole
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
1992-09
Volume
84
Issue
3
Pages
261-271
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2056855771
Cited by
6,468
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 160 · 2025: 207 · 2024: 176 · 2023: 285 · 2022: 252 · 2021: 293 · 2020: 345 · 2019: 304 · 2018: 278 · 2017: 313 · 2016: 317 · 2015: 314 · 2014: 310 · 2013: 332 · 2012: 312
FWCI
45.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
achievement goal theory, classroom climate, classroom structure, student motivation, mastery orientation, task orientation, recognition, teacher authority, children's motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review