Thinking is for doing: Portraits of social cognition from Daguerreotype to laserphoto.
Abstract
From the outset, perspectives on social cognition have taken an emphatically pragmatic stance, as evident in early writing by James, Allport, Bruner, Asch, Heider, Tagiuri, and Jones. After a hiatus, during which social cognition research neglected its proper attunement to social behavior, researchers again are emphasizing that thinking is for doing, that social understanding operates in the service of social interaction. Early and recent (but not intermediate) theories have reflected a pragmatic orientation in 3 recurring themes: People are good-enough social perceivers; people construct meaning through traits, stereotypes, and stories; and people's thinking strategies depend on their goals. The pragmatic viewpoint again opens up new areas for research and theory in social cognition.
Cites (9)
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesTversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1975 · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making
- The Elaboration Likelihood Model of PersuasionPetty, Richard E., Cacioppo, John T. · 1986 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perceptionJones, Edward E., Davis, Keith E. · 1965 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations.Fiske, Alan P. · 1992 · Psychological Review
- Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations.Skowronski, John J., Carlston, Donal E. · 1989 · Psychological Bulletin
- A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception.Reeder, Glenn D., Brewer, Marilynn B. · 1979 · Psychological Review
- The dilution effect: Nondiagnostic information weakens the implications of diagnostic informationNisbett, Richard E., Zukier, Henry, Lemley, Ronald E. · 1981 · Cognitive Psychology
- Social perception and social reality: A reflection-construction model.Jussim, Lee · 1991 · Psychological Review
- Approaches to studying formal and everyday reasoning.Galotti, Kathleen M. · 1989 · Psychological Bulletin
Cited by (24)
- A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition.Fiske, Susan T., Cuddy, Amy J. C., Glick, Peter, Xu, Jun · 2002 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Accounting for the effects of accountability.Lerner, Jennifer S., Tetlock, Philip E. · 1999 · Psychological Bulletin
- Leadership development:Day, David V · 2000 · The Leadership Quarterly
- Where is the child's environment? A group socialization theory of development.Harris, Judith Rich · 1995 · Psychological Review
- Sources of Self-Efficacy in School: Critical Review of the Literature and Future DirectionsUsher, Ellen L., Pajares, Frank · 2008 · Review of Educational Research
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thinking is for doing: Portraits of social cognition from Daguerreotype to laserphoto. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.63.6.877
- The paper
- Fiske, S. T. (1992). Thinking is for doing: Portraits of social cognition from Daguerreotype to laserphoto. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.63.6.877
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.