Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment.

Abstract

Four experiments examined the effects of happiness on the tendency to use stereotypes in social judgment. In each experiment, individuals who had been induced to feel happy rendered more stereotypic judgments than did those in a neutral mood. Experiment 1 demonstrated this phenomenon with a mood induction procedure that involved recalling life experiences. Experiments 2 and 3 suggested that the greater reliance on stereotypes evident in the judgments of happy individuals was not attributable to cognitive capacity deficits created by intrusive happy thoughts or by cognitively disruptive excitement or energetic arousal that may accompany the experience of happiness. In Experiment 4, happy individuals again were found to render more stereotypic judgments, except under conditions in which they had been told that they would be held accountable for their judgments. These results suggest that although happy people's tendency to engage in stereotypic thinking may be pervasive, they are quite capable of avoiding the influence of stereotypes in their judgments when situational factors provide a motivational impetus for such effort. Discovering the conditions under which group stereotypes are likely to be applied in forming impressions of and making judgments about individuals has been an issue of perennial interest in social psychology. Factors such as information overload (Pratto & Bargh, 1991; Stangor & Duan, 1991) and task difficulty (Bodenhausen & Lichtenstein, 1987), for example, have been shown to increase the social perceiver's reliance on stereotypic preconceptions (for a review, see Hamilton & Sherman, in press). In the present research, we investigated the role of emotion, specifically happiness, in the application of stereotypes during social information processing. Does being happy have any impact on the likelihood of stereotyping others? If so, what is the mechanism involved? It was these questions that we sought to address. Interest in the relationship between emotion and stereotyping is certainly not new. However, previous attempts to understand the role of affective experience in prejudice and stereotyping have focused almost exclusively on the impact of negative emotions. Conventional wisdom indicates that it is during times of stress, anxiety, or hostility that prejudice and stereotypes are most likely to emerge and exert their influence on social perception. Psychological research lends credence to the idea that anger, conflict, frustration, and anxiety are indeed associated with

Cites (10)

1. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
   Tajfel, Henri, Turner, John C. · 2004 · Political Psychology
2. The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
   Petty, Richard E., Cacioppo, John T. · 1986 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
3. Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
   Devine, Patricia G. · 1989 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
4. Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states.
   Schwarz, Norbert, Clore, Gerald L. · 1983 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
5. Downward comparison principles in social psychology
   Wills, Thomas A. · 1981 · Psychological Bulletin
6. Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview
   Greenberg, Jeff, Pyszczynski, Tom, Solomon, Sheldon, Rosenblatt, Abram, Veeder, Mitchell, Kirkland, Shari, Lyon, Deborah · 1990 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
7. Voluntary Facial Action Generates Emotion‐Specific Autonomic Nervous System Activity
   Levenson, Robert W., Ekman, Paul, Friesen, Wallace V. · 1990 · Psychophysiology
8. Accountability and complexity of thought.
   Tetlock, Philip E. · 1983 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
9. Prejudice with and without compunction
   Devine, Patricia G., Monteith, Margo J., Zuwerink, Julia R., Elliot, Andrew J. · 1991 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
10. Terror management and tolerance: Does mortality salience always intensify negative reactions to others who threaten one’s worldview?
    Greenberg, Jeff, Simon, Linda, Pyszczynski, Tom, Solomon, Sheldon, Chatel, Dan · 1992 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 10 references

Cited by (38)

1. The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?
   Lyubomirsky, Sonja, King, Laura, Diener, Ed · 2005 · Psychological Bulletin
2. Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior
   Strack, Fritz, Deutsch, Roland · 2004 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
3. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
   Kahneman, Daniel, Frederick, Shane · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
4. Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM).
   Forgas, Joseph P. · 1995 · Psychological Bulletin
5. Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice
   Lerner, Jennifer S., Keltner, Dacher · 2000 · Cognition & Emotion

See all 716