When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority.

Abstract

On the basis of fairness heuristic theory, the authors argue that when information about whether an authority can be trusted is not available, people will resolve the question of how they should interpret the decisions of the authority by relying on perceived procedural fairness. As a consequence, people who do not have information about authority's trustworthiness react more positively toward the outcomes of authority's decisions if the authority is using fair as opposed to unfair procedures. However, when people know that the authority either can or cannot be trusted, they are less in need of procedural fairness information, yielding less strong effects of procedural fairness on people's reactions. The findings of 2 experiments support the authors' line of reasoning. It is concluded that people especially need procedural fairness when information about an authority's trustworthiness is lacking.

Cites (5)

1. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
   Lind, E. Allan, Tyler, Tom R. · 1988 · Critical Issues in Social Justice
2. What Should Be Done with Equity Theory?
   Leventhal, Gerald S. · 1980 · Social Exchange
3. A Relational Model of Authority in Groups
   Tyler, Tom R., Lind, E. Allan · 1992 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
4. How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect.
   van den Bos, Kees, Lind, E. Allan, Vermunt, Riël, Wilke, Henk A. M. · 1997 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
5. Distributional and Procedural Aspects of Satisfaction With Citizen-Police Encounters
   Tyler, Tom R., Folger, Robert · 1980 · Basic and Applied Social Psychology

Show all 5 references

Cited by (23)

1. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
   Colquitt, Jason A., Conlon, Donald E., Wesson, Michael J., Porter, Christopher O. L. H., Ng, K. Yee · 2001 · Journal of Applied Psychology
2. Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives.
   Colquitt, Jason A., Scott, Brent A., Rodell, Jessica B., Long, David M., Zapata, Cindy P., Conlon, Donald E., Wesson, Michael J. · 2013 · Journal of Applied Psychology
3. Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice
   Cropanzano, Russell, Byrne, Zinta S., Bobocel, D.Ramona, Rupp, Deborah E. · 2001 · Journal of Vocational Behavior
4. Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments
   van den Bos, Kees, Lind, E. Allan · 2002 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
5. JUSTICE IN TEAMS: ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE CLIMATE
   COLQUITT, JASON A., NOE, RAYMOND A., JACKSON, CHRISTINE L. · 2002 · Personnel Psychology

See all 519