Status and solidarity in social comparison: Agentic and communal values and vertical and horizontal directions.

Abstract

Social comparison involves positioning the self relative to others on a vertical or status dimension (ranging from upward to downward comparisons) and a horizontal or solidarity dimension (ranging from contrastive to connective comparisons). Across 3 studies in which 389 undergraduates recorded everyday social comparisons (n = 4,417), downward and connective comparisons were rated as more helpful and mood enhancing than upward and contrastive comparisons. The effects of horizontal comparisons were greater for people for whom solidarity was an important value; however, the effects of vertical comparisons were not greater for people who valued status. The roles of the comparison target, topic, and situation were also explored; for example, noticing undesirable features of the target enhanced status but undermined solidarity.

Cites (8)

1. The measurement of psychological androgyny
   Bem, Sandra L. · 1974 · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
2. Toward a self‐evaluation maintenance model of social behavior
   Tesser, Abraham · 1988 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
3. For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations
   Collins, Rebecca L. · 1996 · Psychological Bulletin
4. What is social comparison and how should we study it?
   Wood, Joanne V. · 1996 · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
5. On the confluence of self-esteem maintenance mechanisms
   Tesser, Abraham · 2000 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
6. Locating narcissism within the interpersonal circumplex and the five-factor model
   Bradlee, Peter M., Emmons, Robert A. · 1992 · Personality and Individual Differences
7. Circular reasoning about interpersonal behavior: Evidence concerning some untested assumptions underlying diagnostic classification
   Wiggins, Jerry S., Phillips, Norman, Trapnell, Paul · 1989 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
8. Particularistic and universalistic evaluation in the social comparison process.
   Miller, Dale T., Turnbull, William, McFarland, Cathy · 1988 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 8 references

Cited by (5)

1. Managerial Risk Taking: A Multitheoretical Review and Future Research Agenda
   Hoskisson, Robert E., Chirico, Francesco, Zyung, Jinyong (Daniel), Gambeta, Eni · 2017 · Journal of Management
2. Empirical test of bullies' status goals: assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige
   Sijtsema, Jelle J., Veenstra, René, Lindenberg, Siegwart, Salmivalli, Christina · 2009 · Aggressive Behavior
3. Influence and adjustment goals: Sources of cultural differences in ideal affect.
   Tsai, Jeanne L., Miao, Felicity F., Seppala, Emma, Fung, Helene H., Yeung, Dannii Y. · 2007 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
4. When every day is a high school reunion: Social media comparisons and self-esteem.
   Midgley, Claire, Thai, Sabrina, Lockwood, Penelope, Kovacheff, Chloe, Page-Gould, Elizabeth · 2021 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
5. The effect of mortality salience on status consumption among elderly individuals: the moderating role of chronological age and subjective age
   Rezaee Vessal, Saeedeh, Partouche-Sebban, Judith · 2022 · Journal of Organizational Change Management

See all 164