Cited by 256Personality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

Locating narcissism within the interpersonal circumplex and the five-factor model

Bradlee, Peter M., Emmons, Robert A.·1992·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90056-u

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Narcissists are less likely than nonnarcissists to set goals related to affiliation, such as catering for the welfare of their social environments or forming close interpersonal bonds.

    “Likewise, narcissists are less likely than nonnarcissists to set goals related to affiliation, such as catering for the welfare of their social environments or forming close interpersonal bonds (Bradlee & Emmons, 1992; Jonason & Zeigler-Hill, 2018; Thomaes, Stegge, et al., 2008; Zeigler-Hill, Vrabel, et al., 2018).”

    From The "Why" and "How" of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic Status Pursuit (2020) · cites this paper as Bradlee & Emmons, 1992

  • Narcissists tend to select public over private social settings because in such settings they can place themselves in the limelight and earn the status they pursue.

    “First, narcissists tend to select public over private social settings because in such settings they can place themselves in the limelight of social activity and earn the status they pursue. For example, narcissists often select environments rich in social interactions, wherein opportunities for elevating their social image are abundant (Bradlee & Emmons, 1992; Morf & Rhodewalt, 2001).”

    From The "Why" and "How" of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic Status Pursuit (2020) · cites this paper as Bradlee & Emmons, 1992

  • Both children and adults with narcissistic traits tend to set status-relevant goals, such as increasing in social rank, garnering respect, protecting their reputation, and influencing others.

    “Both children and adults with narcissistic traits tend to set status-relevant goals, such as increasing in social rank, garnering respect, protecting their reputation, and influencing others (Bradlee & Emmons, 1992; Jonason & Zeigler-Hill, 2018; Thomaes, Stegge, Bushman, Olthof, & Denissen, 2008; Zeigler-Hill, Vrabel, et al., 2018).”

    From The "Why" and "How" of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic Status Pursuit (2020) · cites this paper as Bradlee & Emmons, 1992

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bradlee, P. M., & Emmons, R. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Bradlee, Peter M.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-07
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
821-830
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039426593
Cited by
256
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
narcissism, Narcissistic Personality Inventory, interpersonal circumplex, Big Five personality traits, dominance, exhibitionism, agency, communion, extraversion, neuroticism, agreeableness, personality structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review