Bidding on the future: Evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards.

Kirby, Kris N.·1997·Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Abstract

Normative economic models assume that delay-discounting rates for future rewards are independent of the amount of, and delay to, a reward. These assumptions were tested in 3 experiments in which participants were asked to bid their own money on delayed monetary rewards in a sealed, second-bid auction. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants made their bids without feedback about the bids of other participants. In Experiment 3, half of the participants received such feedback. In Experiments 2 and 3, participants adjusted their bids until they were indifferent between the bid and the delayed reward. Participants' bids violated both normative assumptions: Discounting rates decreased with increases in amount for 62 of 67 participants, and a function in which the rate decreases with increases in delay (hyperbolic) fit the bids better than did a normative function (exponential) for 59 of 67 participants. A future reward is typically worth less to us than the same

Cites (7)

  1. COUNTERSPECULATION, AUCTIONS, AND COMPETITIVE SEALED TENDERS
    Vickrey, William · 1961 · The Journal of Finance
  2. Delay of gratification in children.
    Mischel, Walter, Shoda, Yuichi, Rodriguez, Monica L. · 1989 · Science
  3. Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.
    Ainslie, George · 1975 · Psychological Bulletin
  4. ON TWO TYPES OF DEVIATION FROM THE MATCHING LAW: BIAS AND UNDERMATCHING 1
    Baum, William M. · 1974 · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
  5. SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITY AND DELAY
    Rachlin, Howard, Raineri, Andres, Cross, David · 1991 · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
  6. Discounting of Delayed Rewards: A Life-Span Comparison
    Green, Leonard, Fry, Astrid F, Myerson, Joel · 1994 · Psychological Science
  7. Preference Reversals Due to Myopic Discounting of Delayed Reward
    Kirby, Kris N., Herrnstein, R.J. · 1995 · Psychological Science

Show all 7 references

Cited by (61)

  1. Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases
    Preston, Stephanie D., de Waal, Frans B. M. · 2002 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  2. The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans?
    Suddendorf, Thomas, Corballis, Michael C. · 2007 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  3. A Discounting Framework for Choice With Delayed and Probabilistic Rewards.
    Green, Leonard, Myerson, Joel · 2004 · Psychological Bulletin
  4. Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers
    Bickel, W. K., Odum, A. L., Madden, G. J. · 1999 · Psychopharmacology
  5. RETRACTED: Procrastination, Deadlines, and Performance: Self-Control by Precommitment
    Ariely, Dan, Wertenbroch, Klaus · 2002 · Psychological Science · Retracted

See all 750

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bidding on the future: Evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0096-3445.126.1.54
The paper
Kirby, K. N. (1997). Bidding on the future: Evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.126.1.54

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.