Cited by 177Optimism, Hope, and Well-beingCancer survivorship and careAging and Gerontology Research

Pessimism, age, and cancer mortality.

Schulz, Richard, Bookwala, Jamila, Knapp, Judith E., Scheier, Michael, Williamson, Gail M.·1996·Psychology and Aging

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0882-7974.11.2.304

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schulz, R., Bookwala, J., Knapp, J. E., Scheier, M., & Williamson, G. M.
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
1996
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
304-309
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W4254078744
Cited by
175
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
pessimism, age, cancer mortality, pessimistic explanatory style, aging, mortality risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review