The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bootstraps taxometrics: Solving the classification problem in psychopathology
Abstract
Classification in psychopathology is a problem in applied mathematics; it answers the empirical question "Is the latent structure of these phenotypic indicator correlations taxonic (categories) or nontaxonic (dimensions, factors)?" It is not a matter of convention or preference. Two taxometric procedures, MAMBAC and MAXCOV-HITMAX, provide independent tests of the taxonic conjecture and satisfactorily accurate estimates of the taxon base rate, the latent means, and the valid and false-positive rates achievable by various cuts. The method requires no gold standard criterion, applying crude fallible diagnostic "criteria" only in the phase of discovery to identify plausible candidate indicators. Confidence in the inference to taxonic structure and numerical accuracy of latent values is provided by multiple consistency tests, hence the term coherent cut kinetics for the general approach. Further revision of diagnostic systems should be based on taxometric analysis rather than on committee decisions based on clinical impressions and nontaxometric research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Satisfying these requirements, for the four indicators, mean full sample r = 0.37 and mean taxon and complement rs ≤ 0.06.”
From A Latent Structure Analysis of Cognitive Vulnerability to Depression in Adolescence (2019) · cites this paper as Meehl, 1995
In the citing paper
“This condition was satisfied in the current study (for all indicators, d ≥ 1.25)2.”
From A Latent Structure Analysis of Cognitive Vulnerability to Depression in Adolescence (2019) · cites this paper as Meehl, 1995
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
When and where do we apply what we learn?: A taxonomy for far transfer
Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612 · Cited by 2,076
“(Meehl, 1995, p. 269) In this section we propose a taxonomy of the various dimensions along which studies may be organized, explain why these dimensions were chosen, discuss possible interactions between dimensions, and apply the taxonomy to the transfer literature.”
BackgroundFraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.4.2.132 · Cited by 1,601
“Instead, these authors used taxometric techniques developed by Meehl and his colleagues (Meehl, 1995).”
MethodMarsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Morin, A. J. S. (2009) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705510902751010 · Cited by 1,245
Can network analysis transform psychopathology?
McNally, R. J. (2016) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.006 · Cited by 1,072
Reconsidering happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia
Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760802303044 · Cited by 1,027
Haslam, N., Holland, E., & Kuppens, P. (2012) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291711001966 · Cited by 611
Mental Disorders as Causal Systems: A Network Approach to Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
McNally, R. J., Robinaugh, D. J., Wu, G. W. Y., Wang, L., Deserno, M. K., & Borsboom, D. (2015) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702614553230 · Cited by 592
Psychopathic, not psychopath: Taxometric evidence for the dimensional structure of psychopathy.
Edens, J. F., Marcus, D. K., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Poythress, N. G. (2006) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.115.1.131 · Cited by 600
“MAXEIG is a multivariate extension of Meehl and Yonce’s (1996)”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2004) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.9.1.3 · Cited by 536
“…generating model, and because each model can equivalently reproduce the covariances, it could be argued that neither model is superior to the other (i.e., Cudeck & Henly, 2003; B. Muthén, 2003), though we do not necessarily take this view ourselves (Bauer & Curran, 2003b; see also Meehl, 1995).”
BackgroundFraley, R. C., & Spieker, S. (2003) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.3.387 · Cited by 465
The relevance of analogue studies for understanding obsessions and compulsions
Abramowitz, J. S., Fabricant, L. E., Taylor, S. J., Deacon, B. J., McKay, D., & Storch, E. A. (2014) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2014.01.004 · Cited by 403
Hankin, B., Fraley, R. C., Lahey, B. B., & Waldman, I. (2005) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.114.1.96 · Cited by 363
MacDonald, K. S., Thomas, M. L., Sciolla, A., Schneider, B., Pappas, K., Bleijenberg, G., Bohus, M., Bradley, B., Carpenter, L. L., Carr, A., et al. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146058 · Cited by 374
“To do so, we relied on taxometric analyses [52–56], procedures that determine if relations among observed data are better accounted for by the presence of dimensional or categorical latent structure.”
MethodMeehl, P. E., & Yonce, L. J. (1996) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1996.78.3c.1091 · Cited by 331
Self-citationRuscio, A. M., Ruscio, J., & Keane, T. M. (2002) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.111.2.290 · Cited by 319
“Meehl and his colleagues (e.g., Meehl, 1995; Waller & Meehl, 1998) have devised a methodological approach for exploring the latent structure of psychological constructs.”
BackgroundResultBeauchaine, T. P., & McNulty, T. (2013) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579413000746 · Cited by 348
“Lacking such specification, we are forced to infer psychopathology solely from symptoms, which are often insensitive and nonspecific indicators of disease state (see Beauchaine, Lenzenweger, & Waller, 2008; Meehl, 1995).”
BackgroundDimensions over categories: a meta-analysis of taxometric research
Haslam, N., McGrath, M. J., Viechtbauer, W., & Kuppens, P. (2020) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329172000183x · Cited by 281
“Taxometric methods were developed as a means of adjudicating between categorical and dimensional models of latent variables by Meehl (1995).”
MethodShould substance use disorders be considered as categorical or dimensional?
Muthén, B. (2006) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01583.x · Cited by 267
“Readers interested in substantive aspects of the debate may consult the large set of papers in psychology and psychiatry, including Meehl [ 1 ], Widiger & Clark [2], De Boeck, Wilson & Acton [3] and Markon & Krueger [4].”
BackgroundA Measure of Nature Connectedness for Children and Adults: Validation, Performance, and Insights
Richardson, M., Hunt, A., Hinds, J., Bragg, R., Fido, D., Petronzi, D., Barbett, L., Clitherow, T. J., & White, M. P. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11123250 · Cited by 260
“Non-unimodal distributions have been used to investigate subgroups within a construct [57], and bimodality can suggest latent groups [58]; however observed bimodality does not preclude a continuous dimension [59].”
MethodInforming the continuity controversy: A taxometric analysis of depression.
Ruscio, J., & Ruscio, A. M. (2000) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.109.3.473 · Cited by 243
Foster, J. D., & Campbell, W. K. (2007) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.003 · Cited by 232
“Third, nuisance correlation (Table 2), which is covariation among indicators that occurs within putative groups of ''narcissists'' and ''non-narcissists,'' was within acceptable limits (i.e., r < .30; Meehl, 1995).”
BackgroundA Taxometric Analysis of Psychopathic Personality.
Marcus, D. K., John, S. L., & Edens, J. F. (2004) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.113.4.626 · Cited by 232
“Meehl (2001) often speculated that most psychiatric disorders would not have a taxonic structure, yet he pointed out that “I do not hold that if a DSM rubric does not denote an existent taxon in my sense, it is somehow illicit and should be dropped from the nosology” (p.”
BackgroundA taxometric investigation of the latent structure of worry.
Ruscio, A. M., Borkovec, T. D., & Ruscio, J. (2001) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.110.3.413 · Cited by 231
Categorical Versus Dimensional Models of Mental Disorder: The Taxometric Evidence
Haslam, N. (2003) · Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry (Print) · doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2003.01258.x · Cited by 183
“Claims that taxometrics will ‘solve’ the classification problem in psychopathology [13] are clearly overstated.”
BackgroundEvidence for latent classes of IQ in young children with autism spectrum disorder
Munson, J., Dawson, G., Sterling, L., Beauchaine, T., Zhou, A., Koehler, E., Lord, C., Rogers, S., Sigman, M., Estes, A., et al. (2008) · American Journal on Mental Retardation · doi:10.1352/2008.113:439-452 · Cited by 204
“Meehl (1995) noted that although bimodality and marked skewness may be suggestive of latent groups, the presence of bimodality is neither a necessary nor sufficient condition for the existence of latent subgroups.”
BackgroundFerguson, E. (2011) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2010.547985 · Cited by 220
“These represent a set of procedures to demonstrate if the latent trait is either dimensional or taxonic (see Meehl, 1995).”
BackgroundRuscio, J., Ruscio, A. M., & Mati Meron, E. (2007) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273170701360795 · Cited by 206
“We drew values from ranges traditionally considered to be adequate for informative taxometric analyses (see Meehl, 1995).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSellbom, M. (2010) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10979-010-9249-x · Cited by 203
Assessing tobacco dependence: a guide to measure evaluation and selection
Piper, M., McCarthy, D., & Baker, T. (2006) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1080/14622200600672765 · Cited by 201
“related to theoretically, societally, and clinically meaningful outcomes (criteria) that are attributed to dependence (Figures 1 and 2; Meehl, 1995).”
BackgroundSOLOMON, A., HAAGA, D. A. F., & ARNOW, B. A. (2001) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-200108000-00002 · Cited by 188
“But as noted above, some leading clinical methodologists contend (e.g., Meehl, 1995; Meehl and Golden, 1982; Waller and Meehl, 1998) that even very strong descriptive similarities between limited and diagnosable depression have no necessary implications for the continuity issue.”
BackgroundA taxometric analysis of health anxiety
Ferguson, E. (2009) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291708003322 · Cited by 183
“…(i.e. distributed as a continuous variable, with individuals varying quantitatively from each other) or taxonic (i.e. individuals are differentiated into non-arbitrary groups or categories) (Meehl & Yonce, 1994 ; Meehl, 1995 ; Waller & Meehl, 1998 ; see Ruscio & Ruscio, 2004a for a review).”
BackgroundInfluentialO'Connor, B. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.962 · Cited by 188
Youngstrom, E. A., Findling, R. L., & Calabrese, J. R. (2003) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1023/a:1023244512119 · Cited by 192
“DSM-IV diagnoses (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 1994), for example, might superimpose artificial distinctions on an existing category or continuum ( Meehl, 1995 ).”
BackgroundTaxometric Investigation of PTSD: Data From Two Nationally Representative Samples
Broman‐Fulks, J. J., Ruggiero, K. J., Green, B. A., Kilpatrick, D. G., Danielson, C. K., Resnick, H. S., & Saunders, B. E. (2006) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2006.02.006 · Cited by 176
The latent structure of obsessive-compulsive symptoms: a taxometric study
Olatunji, B. O., Williams, B. J., Haslam, N., Abramowitz, J. S., & Tolin, D. F. (2007) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.20387 · Cited by 165
Borsboom, D., Rhemtulla, M., Cramer, A. O. J., van der Maas, H. L. J., Scheffer, M., & Dolan, C. V. (2016) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291715001944 · Cited by 168
Investigating the “Flow” Experience: Key Conceptual and Operational Issues
Abuhamdeh, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00158 · Cited by 198
“Taxonomic analytic techniques (Meehl, 1995; De Boeck et al., 2005; Ruscio et al., 2006) appear especially well-suited for identifying potential cutoff points.”
BackgroundClarifications about taxometric method
Meehl, P. E. (1999) · Applied and Preventive Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0962-1849(05)80075-7 · Cited by 137
“Only two of the main procedures, MAMBAC (acronym from “Mean Above Minus Below A Cut”; Meehl & Yonce, 1994) and MAXCOV (MAXimum COVariance; Meehl, 1973, 1995b; Meehl & Yonce, 1996), have been published in detail (for a summary of them, see Meehl, 1995a ).”
MethodSelf-citationA Taxometric Analysis of Type-D Personality
Ferguson, E., Williams, L., O’Connor, R. C., Howard, S., Hughes, B. M., Johnston, D. W., Allan, J., O'Connor, D. B., Lewis, C. A., Grealy, M., et al. (2009) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/psy.0b013e3181bd888b · Cited by 142
Evidence of a Taxon Underlying Serious Antisocial Behavior in Boys
Skilling, T. A., Quinsey, V. L., & Craig, W. (2001) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/009385480102800404 · Cited by 137
“…(derived within and across taxometric procedures) were numerically consistent, then there would be strong grounds for believing the taxon exists (Meehl, 1995; Waller, personal communication, February 7, 2000; Waller & Meehl, 1998), and it would be a “damn strange coincidence” otherwise (Meehl,…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialBilingual Language Assessment: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy
Dollaghan, C. A., & Horner, E. A. (2010) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0093 · Cited by 135
Adult Psychopathology: Issues and Controversies
Widiger, T. A., & Sankis, L. M. (2000) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.377 · Cited by 134
A conceptual and psychometric framework for distinguishing categories and dimensions
De Boeck, P., Wilson, M., & Acton, G. S. (2005) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.112.1.129 · Cited by 131
“A third method for distinguishing qualitative differences from quantitative differences is the taxometric approach developed by Meehl (1973, 1995, 1999, 2004 ).”
MethodCategorical versus dimensional models of eating disorders: An examination of the evidence
Williamson, D. A., Gleaves, D. H., & Stewart, T. M. (2004) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.20074 · Cited by 129
Ruscio, J., & Ruscio, A. M. (2004) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.113.1.24 · Cited by 130
“The taxometric method consists of several diverse analytic procedures that were expressly designed to distinguish taxa from dimensions (e.g., Meehl, 1995, 1999; Meehl & Golden, 1982; Waller & Meehl, 1998).”
BackgroundMethodLilienfeld, S. O., Sauvigné, K. C., Lynn, S. J., Cautin, R. L., Latzman, R. D., & Waldman, I. D. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01100 · Cited by 140
Elahi, A., Perez Algorta, G., Varese, F., McIntyre, J. C., & Bentall, R. P. (2017) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2017.03.022 · Cited by 124
“50 as recommended in taxometric analyses (Meehl, 1995).”
Ruscio, A. M. (2002) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0887-6185(02)00130-5 · Cited by 127
Hedonic capacity and schizotypy revisited: A taxometric analysis of social anhedonia.
Blanchard, J. J., Gangestad, S. W., Brown, S. A., & Horan, W. P. (2000) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.109.1.87 · Cited by 128
van Rentergem, J. A. A., Deserno, M. K., & Geurts, H. M. (2021) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102033 · Cited by 133
“Articles that featured only taxo-metric analyses (Bernstein et al., 2007; Meehl, 1995) — aimed at identifying whether there are two subtypes or no subtypes — were also not included.”
Holland, J. M., Neimeyer, R. A., Boelen, P. A., & Prigerson, H. G. (2009) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-008-9113-1 · Cited by 128
“Given these conflicting findings, the present investigation sought to examine the underlying structure of grief using a group of statistical procedures, collectively referred to as the taxometric method (Meehl 1995), that are specifically designed to distinguish between continuous and categorical structures.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialVariable patterns of neuropsychological performance in HIV-1 infection
HNRC Group, Dawes, S. E., Suárez, P., Casey, C. Y., Cherner, M., Marcotte, T. D., Letendre, S. L., Igor Grant, A., & Heaton, R. K. (2008) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/13803390701565225 · Cited by 124
“First, the sample size ( n = 165) was substantially lower than the minimum of 300 participants recommended by Meehl (1995) for cluster analysis.”
BackgroundSkilling, T. A., Harris, G. T., Rice, M., & Quinsey, V. L. (2002) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.14.1.27 · Cited by 124
“If several taxometric methods indicated the presence of a taxon, and parameter estimates arrived at in different ways (derived within and across taxometric procedures) were numerically consistent, then there would be strong grounds for believing the taxon existed (Meehl, 1995; Waller, personal communication, February…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialMultiple Meanings of Calling: Next Steps for Studying an Evolving Construct
Dik, B. J., & Shimizu, A. B. (2018) · Journal of Career Assessment · doi:10.1177/1069072717748676 · Cited by 124
On the classification and diagnosis of pathological grief
Stroebe, M., van Son, M. J. M., Stroebe, W., Kleber, R. J., Schut, H. A. W., & van den Bout, J. (2000) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/s0272-7358(98)00089-0 · Cited by 125
“2A further unfamiliar but potentially useful technique for the diagnosis of pathological grief could be the taxometric approach of Meehl (1995) , who described mathematical procedures that can be used to classify psychiatric patients (for a critical evaluation, see Garb, 1996).”
What is this thing called BED? Current status of binge eating disorder nosology
Devlin, M. J., Goldfein, J. A., & Dobrow, I. J. (2003) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.10201 · Cited by 116
Ruscio, J. (2007) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854807307027 · Cited by 116
“The inferential framework implicit throughout much of the literature on the taxometric method (e.g., Meehl, 1995; Meehl & Golden, 1982; Waller & Meehl, 1998) involves the detection of taxonic structure.”
MethodBiology, Culture, and Temperamental Biases
Kagan, J., & Fox, N. A. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0304 · Cited by 123
Schmidt, A. F., Mokros, A., & Banse, R. (2013) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0033326 · Cited by 109
“Likewise, all within-group nuisance correlations were within acceptable margins (r < .30; Beauchaine, 2007, p. 676; Meehl, 1995, p. 273) except for two out of all 18 instances: The within-taxon correlation of the ESIQ and VT in the MAMBAC analysis (.32) and the within-taxon correlations of ESIQ and…”
Allardyce, J., Gaebel, W., Zielasek, J., & van Os, J. (2007) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbm051 · Cited by 107
“The requisite population-based studies, using appropriate structural statistical analyses, eg, finitemixturemodeling (and its derivates)(28,29) or coherent cut kineticmethods(30) havenotbeen carriedout, so it is still possible that a dichotomous latent construct could underlie the skewed distribution of psychosis indi…”
MethodThe Latent Structure of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Taxometric Analysis
Haslam, N., Williams, B., Prior, M., Haslam, R., Graetz, B., & Sawyer, M. (2006) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01863.x · Cited by 145
“[19,20] offer a direct way of adjudicating between categorical (‘taxonic’) and continuum (‘dimensional’) models of latent variables.”
BackgroundOlatunji, B. O., Broman-Fulks, J. J., Bergman, S. M., Green, B. A., & Zlomke, K. R. (2010) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2009.03.001 · Cited by 105
“It is generally recommended that taxometric investigations employ indicators with high degrees of validity (i.e., 1.25 SD or greater separation between the proposed taxon and nontaxon groups; Meehl, 1995).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSubtyping stuttering I: A review
Yairi, E. (2007) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2007.04.001 · Cited by 104
Blanchard, J. J., Horan, W. P., & Collins, L. M. (2005) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2005.03.022 · Cited by 104
“In the current study we utilized two taxometric procedures: maximum covariance analysis (MAXCOV; Meehl, 1973; Meehl and Golden, 1982) and mean above minus below a cut (MAMBAC; Meehl, 1995; Meehl and Yonce, 1994).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRuscio, A. M., & Ruscio, J. (2002) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.14.2.135 · Cited by 104
Sources of Heterogeneity in Schizophrenia: The Role of Neuropsychological Functioning
Seaton, B. E., Goldstein, G., & Allen, D. N. (2001) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1023/a:1009013718684 · Cited by 103
“We are aware that cluster analysis is a somewhat controversial technique, and other classification or taxonomic methods are available (Meehl, 1995).”
BackgroundA California Q-set alexithymia prototype and its relationship to ego-control and ego-resiliency
Haviland, M. G., & Reise, S. P. (1996) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(96)00223-1 · Cited by 105
The Latent Structure of Psychopathy in Youth: A Taxometric Investigation
Vasey, M. W., Kotov, R., Frick, P. J., & Loney, B. R. (2005) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-005-5723-1 · Cited by 103
“One approach to this problem is bootstrapping ( Meehl, 1995 ).”
BackgroundInfluentialKilleen, P. R. (1995) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1995.64-405 · Cited by 99
“The issue, as Skinner and others (Feigl, 1950; Meehl, 1995) have stated, is not whether such constructs are hypothetical, but whether they pay their way in the cost-benefit ratio of constructs to predictions.”
BackgroundTaxometric Analysis of the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale
Walters, G. D., Brinkley, C. A., Magaletta, P. R., & Diamond, P. M. (2008) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223890802248828 · Cited by 99
“The mean indicator validity value of 1.28 exceeded the minimal value (σ = 1.25) recommended by Meehl (1995) for proper evaluation of latent structure using the taxometric procedure.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBeauchaine, T. P., & J., I. B. R. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.245 · Cited by 97
“…size, moderate within-groups correlations, and two valid indicators of taxon-group membership, x and y, the betweengroups indicator covariances will exceed the withingroups covariances, as specified in the general covari- ance mixture theorem (Meehl, 1995a, p. 271; Meehl & Yonce, 1996, p. 1097).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTesting the latent structure of posttraumatic stress disorder: A taxometric study of combat veterans
Forbes, D., Haslam, N., Williams, B. J., & Creamer, M. C. (2005) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.20073 · Cited by 97
Taxometric analysis supports a dimensional latent structure for schizotypy
Rawlings, D., Williams, B. J., Haslam, N., & CLARIDGE, G. S. (2007) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.06.005 · Cited by 96
The Latent Structure of Psychopathy
Walters, G. D., Duncan, S. A., & Mitchell-Perez, K. (2007) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191107299594 · Cited by 96
“Average indicator validity (Cohen’s d) was 1.80 (σ) using a cutting score of 25 and 1.59 (σ) using a cutting score of 30, both of which exceed the minimally acceptable value of 1.25 (σ) recommended by Meehl (1995).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMeasures and models of nicotine dependence: positive reinforcement
Glautier, S. (2004) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00736.x · Cited by 97
A Taxometric Study of Borderline Personality Disorder.
Rothschild, L., Cleland, C. M., Haslam, N., & Zimmerman, M. (2003) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.112.4.657 · Cited by 91
Zisner, A. R., & Beauchaine, T. P. (2016) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579416000754 · Cited by 101
“Lacking specification of etiology, we must infer psychopathology solely from symptoms, which are often nonspecific, insensitive markers of disease state (see Beauchaine, Lenzenweger, & Waller, 2008; Meehl, 1995).”
BackgroundRuscio, J., Ruscio, A. M., & Keane, T. M. (2004) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.113.1.145 · Cited by 92
“…somatic symptoms better represent this depressive construct than cognitive and affective symptoms, Beach and Amir conducted taxometric analyses (see Meehl, 1995) of college students’ responses to six somatic items on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck, Rush, Shaw, & Emery, 1979) and…”
BackgroundSubtyping obsessive-compulsive disorder: A taxometric analysis
Haslam, N., Williams, B. J., Kyrios, M., McKay, D., & Taylor, S. J. (2005) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(05)80120-0 · Cited by 96
“Taxometric methods (Meehl, 1995; Schmidt, Kotov, & Joiner, 2004; Waller & Meehl, 1998) are well suited to making this decision.”
MethodPrimary and secondary hypohedonia.
Meehl, P. E. (2001) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.110.1.188 · Cited by 93
“Again, no statistical procedure is self-interpreting (Meehl, 1995, 1999), and taxometrics in this respect is like factor analysis, cluster analysis, multidimensional scaling, or item response theory.”
MethodSelf-citationIs a Diagnostic Category for Paraphilic Coercive Disorder Defensible?
Knight, R. A. (2009) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9571-x · Cited by 91
“A number of studies have used taxometric methods ( Meehl, 1995 ) to address the problem of the latent distribution of psychopathy and antisociality, which contributes to the first two components of the typological model (Edens, Marcus, Lilienfeld, & Poythress, 2006; Guay, Ruscio, Knight, & Hare, 2007; Harris, Rice, &…”
MethodAn examination of the diagnostic validity of dissociative identity disorder
Gleaves, D. H., May, M. C., & Cardeña, E. (2001) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/s0272-7358(99)00073-2 · Cited by 89
“Taxometric procedures (see Meehl, 1995; Waller & Meehl, 1997) are used to distinguish psychological types (i.e., qualitative differences) from mere variations in a continuum (i.e., just quantitative differences) and, if a construct is typological, to determine a set of indicators for that taxon.”
MethodAn Examination of Psychosocial Correlates of Disordered Eating among Undergraduate Women
Cohen, D. L., & Petrie, T. A. (2005) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-005-1191-x · Cited by 89
“Recently, research in this area has moved away from a practical examination of group similarities and differences to a more direct investigation of the underlying structure of eating disorders through taxometric analyses ( Meehl, 1995 ).”
BackgroundAhmed, A. O., Strauss, G. P., Buchanan, R. W., Kirkpatrick, B. W., & Carpenter, W. T. (2014) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbu163 · Cited by 88
Frazier, T. W., Youngstrom, E. A., Sinclair, L. V., Kubu, C. S., Law, P. A., Rezai, A. R., Constantino, J. N., & Eng, C. (2009) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191109356534 · Cited by 91
“The difference in observed and latent distributions should not be viewed as a discrepancy, as previous researchers have described the numerous reasons why uni- and bimodal observed score distributions do not imply continuous or categorical latent distributions (Meehl, 1995; Murphy, 1964; Ruscio et al., 2006; Waller &…”
BackgroundResultAnxiety disorder symptoms at age 10 predict eating disorder symptoms and diagnoses in adolescence
Schaumberg, K., Zerwas, S., Goodman, E., Yilmaz, Z., Bulik, C. M., & Micali, N. (2019) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12984 · Cited by 80
Credentialed persons, credentialed knowledge.
Meehl, P. E. (1997) · Clinical Psychology Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.1997.tb00103.x · Cited by 84
“inverse factor analysis, latent class analysis, mixture analysis, and—a method which I am bold enough to say has definitively solved the problem —my taxometric method, which involves several nonredundant independent procedures (Meehl, 1995).”
MethodSelf-citationReimagining psychoses: An agnostic approach to diagnosis
Keshavan, M. S., Clementz, B. A., Pearlson, G. D., Sweeney, J. A., & Tamminga, C. A. (2013) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2013.02.022 · Cited by 88
Anxiety Disorders in Childhood: Casting a Nomological Net
Weems, C. F., & Stickle, T. R. (2005) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10567-005-4751-2 · Cited by 92
“(Beauchaine, 2003; Meehl, 1995).”
Lahaie, M.-A., Amsel, R., Khalifé, S., Boyer, S. C., Faaborg-Andersen, M., & Binik, Y. M. (2014) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0430-z · Cited by 83
“MAXCOV-HITMAX is a taxometric method that examines the maximum covariation between two variables as a function of a third.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCategories and Dimensions: Advancing Psychological Science Through the Study of Latent Structure
Ruscio, J., & Ruscio, A. M. (2008) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00575.x · Cited by 78
Taxometric Analyses of Specific Language Impairment in 6-Year-Old Children
Dollaghan, C. A. (2011) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0187 · Cited by 82
Cleland, C. M., Rothschild, L., & Haslam, N. (2000) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.2000.87.1.37 · Cited by 80
Kollman, D. M., Brown, T. A., Liverant, G. I., & Hofmann, S. G. (2006) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.20158 · Cited by 79
“E-mail: kollman@bu.edu Center for Anxiety and Related Disorders, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts r 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [e.g., Meehl, 1973, 1995; Meehl and Golden, 1982; Meehl and Yonce, 1994, 1996; J. Ruscio and Ruscio, 2004a; Waller and Meehl, 1998].”
BackgroundMethodA Structure-Based Approach to Psychological Assessment
Ruscio, J., & Ruscio, A. M. (2002) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191102091002 · Cited by 80
“Dahlstrom (1995), Gangestad and Snyder (1985), and Meehl (1992, 1995) also discussed strong biases against latent taxa.”
BackgroundA Typology of Teacher-Rated Child Behavior for a National U.S. Sample
Kamphaus, R. W., Huberty, C. J., DiStefano, C., & Petoskey, M. D. (1997) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1023/a:1022681630818 · Cited by 79
Psychophysiological Methods and Developmental Psychopathology
Zisner, A. R., & Beauchaine, T. P. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119125556.devpsy222 · Cited by 84
A Taxometric Investigation of Unipolar Depression in the National Comorbidity Survey.
Prisciandaro, J. J., & Roberts, J. E. (2005) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.114.4.718 · Cited by 78
“Accordingly, indicator validity parameters (i.e., standardized between-group mean differences, calculated with Cohen's effect size d) estimated by the taxometric programs were also acceptably high (mean indicator validity ϭ 1.75 and 1.36, respectively; see Meehl, 1995a).”
InfluentialTaxonicity of anxiety sensitivity: a multi-national analysis.
Bernstein, A., Zvolensky, M. J., Kotov, R., Arrindell, W., Taylor, S., Sandín, B., Cox, B., Stewart, S., Bouvard, M., Cárdenas, S. J., et al. (2006) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2004.11.006 · Cited by 84
Lynskey, M. T., & Arpana Agrawal, A. (2007) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291707000396 · Cited by 76
“Taxometric techniques, on the other hand, test the hypothesis of whether the covariation between abuse and dependence criteria is indicative of a latent structure that is dimensional or categorical/taxonic (Meehl, 1995).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Meehl, P. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Meehl, Paul E.
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 266-275
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W2081843991
- Cited by
- 702
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 17.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- psychopathology classification, diagnostic criteria, cut-off values, latent structure
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review