Cited by 818Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Counting blessings in early adolescents: An experimental study of gratitude and subjective well-being

Froh, Jeffrey J., Sefick, William J., Emmons, Robert A.·2008·Journal of School Psychology

Abstract

The development and manifestation of gratitude in youth is unclear. We examined the effects of a grateful outlook on subjective well-being and other outcomes of positive psychological functioning in 221 early adolescents. Eleven classes were randomly assigned to either a gratitude, hassles, or control condition. Results indicated that counting blessings was associated with enhanced self-reported gratitude, optimism, life satisfaction, and decreased negative affect. Feeling grateful in response to aid mediated the relationship between experimental condition and general gratitude at the 3-week follow-up. The most significant finding was the robust relationship between gratitude and satisfaction with school experience at both the immediate post-test and 3-week follow-up. Counting blessings seems to be an effective intervention for well-being enhancement in early adolescents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsp.2007.03.005

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Activities such as expressing gratitude, counting blessings, and writing about life goals have positive effects on one's well-being.

    “Examples are activities such as expressing gratitude (Algoe 2008), counting your blessings (Froh et al. 2008), and writing about life goals (King 2001) that have indeed been found to have positive effects on one ' s well-being.”

    From The role of passion in sustainable psychological well-being (2012) · cites this paper as Froh et al. 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Froh, J. J., Sefick, W. J., & Emmons, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Hofstra University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Froh, Jeffrey J.
Venue
Journal of School Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
213-233
ISSN
0022-4405 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993805518
Cited by
818
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 37
FWCI
17.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of School Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
gratitude, early adolescents, subjective well-being, optimism, life satisfaction, negative affect, school satisfaction, gratitude interventions, positive psychology, hassles
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Age Factors, Attitude, Child, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review