Cited by 476Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchCritical Race Theory in EducationCareer Development and Diversity

“Gender Matters, Too: The Influences of School Racial Discrimination and Racial Identity on Academic Engagement Outcomes among African American Adolescents”

Chavous, Tabbye M., Rivas-Drake, Deborah, Smalls, Ciara, Griffin, Tiffany, Cogburn, Courtney·2008·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

The authors examined relationships among racial identity, school-based racial discrimination experiences, and academic engagement outcomes for adolescent boys and girls in Grades 8 and 11 (n = 204 boys and n = 206 girls). The authors found gender differences in peer and classroom discrimination and in the impact of earlier and later discrimination experiences on academic outcomes. Racial centrality related positively to school performance and school importance attitudes for boys. Also, centrality moderated the relationship between discrimination and academic outcomes in ways that differed across gender. For boys, higher racial centrality related to diminished risk for lower school importance attitudes and grades from experiencing classroom discrimination relative to boys lower in centrality, and girls with higher centrality were protected against the negative impact of peer discrimination on school importance and academic self-concept. However, among lower race-central girls, peer discrimination related positively to academic self-concept. Finally, socioeconomic background moderated the relationship of discrimination with academic outcomes differently for girls and boys. The authors discuss the need to consider interactions of individual- and contextual-level factors in better understanding African American youths' academic and social development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.637

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior work has shown that exposure to racial bias during childhood adversely affects black youth, especially black boys, in school.

    “Prior work has shown that exposure to racial bias during childhood adversely affects black youth, especially black boys, in school (e.g., Simpson and Erickson 1983; Chavous et al. 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chavous, T. M., Rivas-Drake, D., Smalls, C., Griffin, T., & Cogburn, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2008-05
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
637-654
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2110113679
Cited by
476
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 21
FWCI
74.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
racial identity, academic engagement, African American adolescents, gender differences, racial centrality, peer discrimination, academic self-concept, academic performance, socioeconomic status, moderation
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adolescent, Black or African American, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Male, Maryland, Motivation, Peer Group, Prejudice, Social Environment, Social Identification, Socioeconomic Factors, Students, Black People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review