Cited by 186Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Neurocognitive function in monozygotic twins discordant for combat exposure: relationship to posttraumatic stress disorder.

Gilbertson, Mark W., Paulus, Lynn A., Williston, Stephanie K., Gurvits, Tamara V., Lasko, Natasha B., Pitman, Roger K., Orr, Scott P.·2006·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Neuropsychological deficits have been reported among trauma survivors with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). It is often assumed that these cognitive difficulties are toxic consequences of trauma exposure. Alternatively, they may reflect preexisting characteristics that contribute to the likelihood of developing PTSD. To address this possibility, the authors evaluated cognitive performance in monozygotic twin pairs who were discordant for combat exposure. Pairs were grouped according to whether the combat-exposed brother developed PTSD. The combat-unexposed cotwins of combat veterans with PTSD largely displayed the same performance as their brothers, which was significantly lower than that of non-PTSD combat veterans and their brothers. The results support the notion that specific domains of cognitive function may serve as premorbid risk or protective factors in PTSD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.115.3.484

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EF deficits are present in attenuated form in unaffected family members of individuals with schizophrenia, BD, OCD, and PTSD.

    “Moreover, there is some evidence that EF deficits are primarily state-independent (manifest even when illness symptoms are not present, (e.g., Kurtz and Gerraty, 2009; Snyder, 2013) and present in attenuated form in unaffected family members of individuals with schizophrenia, BD, OCD, and PTSD, suggesting EF deficits may be an endophenotype for many forms of psychopathology (e.g., Barch, 2005; Gil”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gilbertson, M. W., Paulus, L. A., Williston, S. K., Gurvits, T. V., Lasko, N. B., Pitman, R. K., & Orr, S. P.
Affiliations
  • Manchester VA Medical Center (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2006-08
Volume
115
Issue
3
Pages
484-495
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W1982716251
Cited by
186
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
FWCI
10.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • US Department of Veterans Affairs
  • US Public Health Service (R01-MH54636)
  • US Public Heath Service (K02-MH01110)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, combat exposure, monozygotic twins, discordant twins, neurocognitive function, premorbid risk factors, protective factors, combat veterans, cognitive performance
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Severity of Illness Index, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Twins, Monozygotic, Warfare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review