Cited by 94Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Affect regulation and food intake in bulimia nervosa: emotional responding to food cues after deprivation and subsequent eating

Mauler, Birgit I., Hamm, Alfons O., Weike, Almut I., Tuschen-Caffier, Brunna·2006·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Emotional responding to salient food cues and effects of food deprivation and consumption were investigated in 32 women with bulimia and 32 control women. One half of each group was food deprived before viewing unpleasant, neutral, pleasant, and food-related pictures. Then participants could eat from a buffet before viewing a parallel picture set. Women with bulimia showed a substantial potentiation of startle responses during viewing of food cues relative to control women. This startle potentiation was attenuated by food deprivation and augmented by increased food consumption. These data support the affective regulation model suggesting that food cues prompt negative affective states in women with bulimia, who are overwhelmed by fasting. The resulting deprivation increases the incentive value of food cues and may thus trigger binge eating.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.115.3.567

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Behavioural studies have demonstrated that people with PTSD, OCD, and ED show anomalies in physiological response to threat.

    “Behavioural studies have demonstrated that people with PTSD, OCD, and ED show anomalies in physiological response to threat.”
  • There is an exaggerated physiological startle response to anticipation and viewing of disorder-specific, potentially threatening stimuli, such as images of trauma, contamination, or food, in people with PTSD, OCD, and ED.

    “For example, there is an exaggerated physiological startle response to anticipation and viewing of disorder-specific, potentially threatening stimuli, such as images of trauma, contamination, or food (Altman et al., 2013;Mauler et al., 2006;Pitman et al., 2012;Simon et al., 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mauler, B. I., Hamm, A. O., Weike, A. I., & Tuschen-Caffier, B.
Affiliations
Universität Greifswald (DE)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2006-08
Volume
115
Issue
3
Pages
567-579
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2135379881
Cited by
94
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Christoph-Dornier-Foundation for Clinical Psychology
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Ha 1593/6-2; Ha 1593/10-2)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
bulimia nervosa, emotion regulation, food cues, food deprivation, dietary intake, startle potentiation, emotional responses, binge eating, negative affect, women
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Bulimia, Cues, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food Deprivation, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Expressed Emotion, Self Efficacy, Bulimia Nervosa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review