Cited by 2,673Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCounseling Practices and SupervisionCounseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis

Horvath, Adam O., Symonds, B. Dianne·1991·Journal of Counseling Psychology

Abstract

Results of 24 studies (based on 20 distinct data sets) relating the quality of the working alliance (WA) to therapy outcome were synthesized using meta-analytic procedures. A moderate but reliable association between good WA and positive therapy outcome was found. Overall, the quality of the WA was most predictive of treatment outcomes based on clients' assessments, less so of therapists' assessments, and least predictive of observers' report

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0167.38.2.139

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,013

Metadata

Authors
Horvath, A. O., & Symonds, B. D.
Affiliations
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Venue
Journal of Counseling Psychology
Published
1991-04
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
139-149
ISSN
  • 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2168
OpenAlex
W2088864483
Cited by
2,673
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 100 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 99 · 2015: 123 · 2014: 141 · 2013: 140 · 2012: 161
FWCI
21.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
therapeutic relationship, psychotherapy outcome, client ratings, therapist ratings, observer ratings, treatment outcome prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review