Cited by 699Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsMathematics Education and PedagogyVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer.

Cooper, Graham, Sweller, John·1987·Journal of Educational Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.347

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 18 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 699

Metadata

Authors
Cooper, G., & Sweller, J.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
1987-12
Volume
79
Issue
4
Pages
347-362
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2038059289
Cited by
688
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 29
FWCI
4.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
schema acquisition, mathematical problem solving, transfer of learning, problem-solving strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review