Cited by 87Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesCognitive Functions and MemoryAging and Gerontology Research

Instructional compensation for age-related cognitive declines: Effects of goal specificity in maze learning.

Open access
Paas, Fred, Camp, Gino, Rikers, Remy·2001·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

The differential effects of goal specificity on maze learning among 40 young adults and 40 old adults were investigated. Participants had to navigate through a computerized training-maze task. The finish point of the maze could be presented either as a specific location or in more general terms. After solving the maze problem, participants were required to solve the same problem again, either by moving from start to finish or backward from finish to start. The hypotheses that the presence or absence of a specific goal would disproportionately compromise or enhance, respectively, elderly people's performance were confirmed. Although young adults outperformed old participants in all conditions, these differences were much smaller in the nonspecific goal conditions. These results suggest that instruction based on cognitive load theory (J, Sweller, J.J.G, Van Merrienboer, & F. Paas, 1998) can compensate for age-related cognitive declines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.181

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Goal-free tasks eliminate the need for means-ends search and so decrease extraneous cognitive load.

    “Goal-free tasks present the learner with a highly aspecific goal, which eliminates the need for means-ends search and so decreases extraneous cognitive load (Paas, Camp, & Rikers, 2001; also see Sweller et al., 1998, for an overview).”

    From Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning (2003) · cites this paper as Paas, Camp, & Rikers, 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paas, F., Camp, G., & Rikers, R.
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2001-03
Volume
93
Issue
1
Pages
181-186
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2149642123
Cited by
87
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
age-related cognitive decline, goal specificity, maze learning, spatial navigation, cognitive load theory, older adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review