Cited by 494Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionSocial and Intergroup PsychologyDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Terror management and tolerance: Does mortality salience always intensify negative reactions to others who threaten one’s worldview?

Greenberg, Jeff, Simon, Linda, Pyszczynski, Tom, Solomon, Sheldon, Chatel, Dan·1992·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.212

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 494

Metadata

Authors
Greenberg, J., Simon, L., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & Chatel, D.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1992
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
212-220
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W4294945763
Cited by
487
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 21
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
terror management theory, mortality salience, tolerance, intergroup attitudes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review