The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment, enhancement, and verification determinants of the self-evaluation process.
Abstract
The 3 major self-evaluation motives were compared: self-assessment (people pursue accurate self-knowledge), self-enhancement (people pursue favorable self-knowledge), and self-verification (people pursue highly certain self-knowledge). Ss considered the possession of personality traits that were either positive or negative and either central or peripheral by asking themselves questions that varied in diagnosticity (the extent to which the questions could discriminate between a trait and its alternative) and in confirmation value (the extent to which the questions confirmed possession of a trait). Ss selected higher diagnosticity questions when evaluating themselves on central positive rather than central negative traits and confirmed possession of their central positive rather than central negative traits. The self-enhancement motive emerged as the most powerful determinant of the self-evaluation process, followed by the self-verification motive.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This finding may explain the results of previous studies showing that inflated, unrealistic self‐views and low self‐esteem are related to poor mental health (Neff 2023a, 2023b; Sedikides 1993).”
From The Mechanisms Underlying the Relationship Between Self‐Compassion and Psychological Outcomes in Adult Populations: A Systematic Review. (2025) · cites this paper as Sedikides 1993
Citations
Cites
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193 · Cited by 7,814
Downward comparison principles in social psychology
Wills, T. A. (1981) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.90.2.245 · Cited by 2,705
Toward a self‐evaluation maintenance model of social behavior
Tesser, A. (1988) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60227-0 · Cited by 1,878
Agreeable fancy or disagreeable truth? Reconciling self-enhancement and self-verification.
Swann, W. B., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.782 · Cited by 584
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 570
On the Importance of Cognitive Evaluation as a Determinant of Interpersonal Attraction.
Montoya, R. M., & Horton, R. S. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.696 · Cited by 172
“In the face of a threat to the self, self-protective motives guide decreased attraction to an exceptional individual who could evaluate the self negatively (also see Fromkin, 1972; Sedikides, 1993; Sigall & Landy, 1973).”
BackgroundA multi-rater framework for studying personality: The trait-reputation-identity model.
McAbee, S. T., & Connelly, B. S. (2016) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000035 · Cited by 184
Truth and Consequences: The Costs and Benefits of Accurate Self-Knowledge
Brown, J. D., & Dutton, K. A. (1995) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672952112006 · Cited by 158
THE SELF NOT TAKEN: HOW ALTERNATIVE SELVES DEVELOP AND HOW THEY INFLUENCE OUR PROFESSIONAL LIVES.
Obodaru, O. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0358 · Cited by 176
On the Panculturality of Self-enhancement and Self-protection Motivation
Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & Cai, H. (2015) · Advances in motivation science · doi:10.1016/bs.adms.2015.04.002 · Cited by 150
“have had a prominent status in the field and are comparatively influential (Baumeister, 1998; Brown, 1998; Sedikides, 1993; Sedikides & Green, 2004).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationSocial anxiety and standard setting following social success or failure
Wallace, S. T., & Alden, L. E. (1995) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/bf02227857 · Cited by 114
“Whereas people in general typically seek out and accept feedback that increases their sense of self-worth (see Sedikides, 1993 ), socially nonanxious people's responses to success appear to be motivated by factors other than pure self-enhancement.”
BackgroundAbstract and concrete self-evaluative goals.
Freitas, A. L., Salovey, P., & Liberman, N. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.410 · Cited by 159
Mnemic neglect: Selective amnesia of one’s faults
Sedikides, C., Green, J. D., Saunders, J., Skowronski, J. J., & Zengel, B. U. (2016) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463283.2016.1183913 · Cited by 144
“For example, in relevant research (Sedikides, 1993), participants were presented with a list of candidate questions to ask themselves in private in order to find out if they truly possessed a number of traits.”
BackgroundSelf-citation360-Degree Assessment: Time for Reinvention
Toegel, G., & Conger, J. A. (2003) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2003.10932156 · Cited by 136
“This is followed by consistency, and unfortunately, the appraisal motive comes last when we process information referring to ourselves (Sedikides, 1993).”
BackgroundExamining Emotions in Identity Theory
Stets, J. E. (2005) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/019027250506800104 · Cited by 141
Dunning, D. A. (1995) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672952112007 · Cited by 141
Pinel, E. C., & Paulin, N. (2005) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2704_7 · Cited by 140
“Whether in our personal relationships or in our dealings with strangers, whether at home or in the workplace, most of us welcome at least a little respect (e.g., Baumeister, 1998; Sedikides, 1993).”
BackgroundNeural systems of social comparison and the “above-average” effect
Beer, J. S., & Hughes, B. L. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.075 · Cited by 131
“These criteria ensured that traits differed in their breadth but not in additional factors such as familiarity, social desirability, or self-descriptiveness (measured by certainty: Sedikides, 1993, 1995 ).”
Self-Verification Motives at the Collective Level of Self-Definition.
Chen, S., Chen, K. Y., & Shaw, L. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.77 · Cited by 142
“Self-assessment is another possible self-evaluative motive (e.g., Festinger, 1954; Sedikides, 1993; Trope, 1986).”
BackgroundSedikides, C., & Green, J. D. (2004) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.22.1.4.30987 · Cited by 137
“In a direct test of the self-verification and self-protection perspectives (Sedikides, 1993, Experiment 4), participants with chronically negative or positive self-conceptions (i.e., traits) were invited to the laboratory for a “self-reflection” study.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationMiscalibrated Predictions of Emotional Responses to Self-Promotion
Scopelliti, I., Loewenstein, G., & Vosgerau, J. (2015) · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2015.10736abstract · Cited by 131
“…images of them (Baumeister, 1982; Frey, 1978; Goffman, 1967; Jones & Wortman, 1973; Leary & Kowalski, 1990; Schlenker, Weigold, & Hallam, 1990; Sedikides, 1993), and often engage in self-promotion to achieve this end, for example by enumerating their strengths and positive traits,…”
Self-Enhancement and Self-Protection Motives
Sedikides, C., & Alicke, M. D. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0017 · Cited by 173
Self-citationIdiosyncratic deals and organizational commitment
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2009) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2009.10.006 · Cited by 114
The Illusion of Moral Superiority
Tappin, B. M., & McKay, R. (2016) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550616673878 · Cited by 187
“Indeed, numerous studies have shown that individuals believe they possess, on average, more honesty and trustworthiness than any other characteristic, including intelligence, modesty, friendliness, determination, and independence (e.g., Alicke et al., 2001; Brown, 2012; Sedikides, 1993).”
BackgroundSelf-Anchoring and In-Group Favoritism: An Individual Profiles Analysis
Otten, S., & Wentura, D. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1479 · Cited by 125
“By establishing positive in-group distinctiveness, the self-concept can be enhanced (for the general importance of the self-enhancement motive, see Baumeister, 1998; Sedikides, 1993; Sedikides & Strube, 1995).”
BackgroundAchievement goal orientations and identity formation styles
Kaplan, A., & Flum, H. (2009) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2009.06.004 · Cited by 120
The Effect of Social Density on Word of Mouth
Consiglio, I., Angelis, M. D., & Costabile, M. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucy009 · Cited by 119
Do people really believe they are above average
Williams, E. F., & Gilovich, T. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.01.002 · Cited by 117
“Several processes have been offered to account for selfenhancement, including some form of wishful thinking (e.g., Sedikides, 1993 ), self-serving resolutions of ambiguity (e.g., Dunning et al., 1989), and an egocentric substitution error (e.g., Klar & Giladi, 1997; Kruger, 1999; Moore & Small, 2007).”
BackgroundAthletic Identity and Its Relation to Exercise Behavior: Scale Development and Initial Validation
Anderson, C. B. (2004) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.26.1.39 · Cited by 104
“Although the accuracy of and motivation behind this process of evaluation clearly vary (Sedikides, 1993; Swann, 1990), it was assumed that one’s perceived standing on the general attribute of being “athletic” is determined through self-evaluation of its components (“how do I know?”).”
BackgroundThe Long-Term Stability of Self-Esteem: Its Time-Dependent Decay and Nonzero Asymptote
Kuster, F., & Orth, U. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167213480189 · Cited by 117
“Another transactional process is that people tend to selectively attend to and search for information that confirms their beliefs about themselves, including their self-evaluation (Sedikides, 1993; Swann & Read, 1981).”
Backgrounde-Perceptions: Personality Impressions Based on Personal Websites.
Vazire, S., & Gosling, S. D. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.123 · Cited by 460
“Laboratory studies have shown that under certain circumstances, people at- tempt to manage how they are seen by others (e.g., Leary et al., 1994; Leary & Kowalski, 1990; Sedikides, 1993; Stires & Jones, 1969; Tice, Butler, Muraven, & Stillwell, 1995).”
BackgroundA Three-Tier Hierarchy of Self-Potency
Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., Luke, M. A., O’Mara, E. M., & Gebauer, J. E. (2013) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407188-9.00005-3 · Cited by 113
“…focus on desirable attributes and shun undesirable attributes when contemplating core self-attributes (Sedikides & Green, 2004), while selectively engaging in tasks diagnostic of desirable core self-attributes and avoiding tasks diagnostic of undesirable core self-attributes (Sedikides, 1993).”
BackgroundSelf-citationMindset effects on information search in self-evaluation
Bayer, U. C., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2005) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.247 · Cited by 109
Aspects of Self-Regulation and Self-Structure as Predictors of Perceived Emotional Distress
Gramzow, R. H., Sedikides, C., Panter, A. T., & Insko, C. A. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167200264006 · Cited by 102
“We acknowledge the common, sometimes defensive, tendency toward favorable self-evaluation (Brown & Hutton, 1995; Sedikides, 1993; Sedikides & Strube, 1997) that may carry over into self-reports.”
BackgroundSelf-citationIncongruent effects of sad mood on self‐ conception valence: It's a matter of time
Sedikides, C. (1994) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420240112 · Cited by 95
Self-citationI feel good, therefore I am real: Testing the causal influence of mood on state authenticity
Lenton, A. P., Slabu, L., Sedikides, C., & Power, K. (2013) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2013.778818 · Cited by 121
“Central self-aspects are more certain, strongly valenced, elaborated, consolidated, diagnostic and, critically for our aims, more likely to be perceived as representing the true self (Sedikides, 1993, 1995).”
BackgroundSelf-citationOn the Plasticity of Self-Defense
Tesser, A. (2001) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00117 · Cited by 106
“Compared with other motives like selfconsistency and self-accuracy, the self-enhancement motive appears to be particularly strong and robust (Sedikides, 1993).”
BackgroundGaertner, L., Sedikides, C., Luke, M., O'Mara, E. M., Iuzzini, J., Jackson, L. E., Cai, H., & Wu, Q. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.03.009 · Cited by 104
“…attributes when contemplating core self-attributes (Sedikides, 2012; Sedikides &Green, 2000, 2004), and selectively engage in tasks diagnostic of desirable core self-attributes and avoid tasks diagnostic of undesirable core self-attributes (Sedikides, 1993; for a review, see Gregg et al., 2011).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Impact of Power on Service Customers’ Willingness to Post Online Reviews
Wu, L. L., Mattila, A. S., Wang, C.-Y., & Hanks, L. (2016) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670516630623 · Cited by 117
Resources and Identity Verification from an Identity Theory Perspective
Stets, J. E., & Cast, A. D. (2007) · Sociological Perspectives · doi:10.1525/sop.2007.50.4.517 · Cited by 100
Individual Self, Relational Self, and Collective Self: Partners, Opponents, or Strangers?
Sedikides, C., & Brewer, M. (2015) · doi:10.4324/9781315783024-8 · Cited by 99
Self-citationForgotten but not gone: The recall and recognition of self-threatening memories
Green, J. D., Sedikides, C., & Gregg, A. P. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.006 · Cited by 96
“Validation of stimulus behaviors Past research (Sedikides, 1993, 1995; Sedikides & Green, 2000) had established that university (including UNC-CH) students regard the traits trustworthy and kind as central but the traits modest and uncomplaining as peripheral. In the present experiment, each of these four traits was e…”
Self-citationIndividual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self: Hierarchical Ordering of the Tripartite Self
Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & O’Mara, E. M. (2011) · Psychological Studies · doi:10.1007/s12646-011-0059-0 · Cited by 127
“The core attributes of this self-representation are positive and important, influence the processing of subsequent information, and are resistant to unfavorable feedback but welcoming of favorable feedback (Markus 1977; Sedikides 1993).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBeike, D. R., Lampinen, J. M., & Behrend, D. A. (2004) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203337974 · Cited by 136
Peetz, J., & Wilson, A. E. (2008) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00150.x · Cited by 107
Who's to blame? Narcissism and self‐serving attributions following feedback
Stucke, T. S. (2003) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.497 · Cited by 89
“Narcissists can be characterized by self-enhancing distortions in self-relevant situations (Sedikides, 1993) and are thought to display extreme affective reactions to positive and”
BackgroundAmong friends? An examination of friendship and the self-serving bias.
Campbell, W. K., Sedikides, C., Reeder, G., & Elliot, A. (2000) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466600164444 · Cited by 95
“" Such strivings have been well documented (Brown & Dutton, 1995 ; Sedikides, 1993 ; Sedikides & Strube, 1997).”
Self-citationLooking on the Bright Side: Downward Counterfactual Thinking in Response to Negative Life Events
White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167205276064 · Cited by 82
“We use the term “self-enhancement” to describe people’s desire “to enhance the positivity of their self-conceptions and to protect the self from negative information” (Sedikides, 1993, p. 18).”
MethodBack, M. D., Penke, L., Schmukle, S. C., Sachse, K. A., Borkenau, P., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2010) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.806 · Cited by 103
“Possible mechanisms could for example be mental consistency (Heider, 1958; Newcomb, 1961) or self-enhancement (Markus, 1980; Sedikides, 1993; Taylor & Brown, 1988).”
BackgroundGramzow, R. H., Gaertner, L., & Sedikides, C. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.188 · Cited by 89
Self-citationGniewosz, B., Eccles, J. S., & Noack, P. (2011) · Social Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00635.x · Cited by 101
“…and a motive for consistent and stable (self-verification motive) as well as accurate self-assessments (Elliot & Mapes, 2005; Festinger, 1957; Sedikides, 1993), the individual can be expected to fill this information gap by active information seeking (Pomerantz, Saxon, & Kenney, 2001; Ruble,…”
BackgroundJudgments of a relationship partner: specific accuracy but global enhancement.
Neff, L. A., & Karney, B. (2002) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/1467-6494.05032 · Cited by 90
“Consequently, intimates may be more motivated to enhance their partners on global rather than specific attributes (cf. Sedikides, 1993).”
BackgroundSelf and Identity across the Life Span
McAdams, D. P., & Cox, K. S. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470880166.hlsd002006 · Cited by 128
Conger, J., & Toegel, G. (2002) · Journal of Change Management · doi:10.1080/714023841 · Cited by 88
“It is followed by consistency and, unfortunately, the appraisal motive comes last (Sedikides, 1993).”
BackgroundChapter 1 The Introspection Illusion
Pronin, E. (2009) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)00401-2 · Cited by 139
Lambert, S., Loiselle, C., & Macdonald, M. (2009) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/01.ncc.0000343372.24517.bd · Cited by 86
Паолини, С., & McIntyre, K. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868317753504 · Cited by 107
Individual Differences in Attitude Change
Turnes, P., & Petty, R. (2005) · doi:10.4324/9781410612823.ch14 · Cited by 85
“Although some authors have studied the relationship of the four key motives to each other in order to establish a hierarchy among them (Sedikides, 1993), in attitude change situations, we suspect that any of the motives can be supreme depending on a number of individual and situational factors.”
BackgroundSelf-Construal as a Mediator Between Identity Structure and Subjective Well-Being
Pilarska, A. (2014) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-013-9202-5 · Cited by 82
“…social context, and self-enhancement, as both essential manifestations of self and significant indicators of effective adaptation and mental health (e.g., Block 1961; Donahue et al. 1993; Jarymowicz and Codol 1979; Lecky 1945 as cited in Swann 1990; Rogers 1959; Sedikides 1993; Swann et al. 2005).”
BackgroundThe Provision of Relative Performance Feedback: An Analysis of Performance and Satisfaction
Azmat, G., & Iriberri, N. (2016) · Journal of Economics & Management Strategy · doi:10.1111/jems.12151 · Cited by 82
“The psychology literature has also studied the role of self-assessment (see, for example, Sedikides, 1993).”
Modularity and the Social Mind
Kurzban, R., & Aktipis, A. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868306294906 · Cited by 118
“It has been suggested that people are motivated to achieve and maintain a self that is positive in terms of morality, skills, attributes, and so on (e.g., Aronson, 1992; Sedikides, 1993; Steele, 1988).”
BackgroundThe confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts revisited: Does content matter?
Tausch, N., Kenworthy, J. B., & Hewstone, M. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.542 · Cited by 91
Government-sponsored lotteries: Exploring purchase and nonpurchase motivations
Miyazaki, A. D., Langenderfer, J., & Sprott, D. E. (1999) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6793(199901)16:1 · Cited by 34
Batenburg, A., & Bartels, J. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.033 · Cited by 103
The effects of self-construals, self-criticism, and self-compassion on depressive symptoms
Yamaguchi, A., Kim, M.-S., & Akutsu, S. (2014) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.013 · Cited by 77
“While similar relational concepts to self-compassion have long been studied in psychology (Baumeister, Heatherton, & Tice, 1993; Sedikides, 1993; Taylor & Brown, 1988), Neff (2003) developed Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) and showed that if a person has a higher score on this scale, s/he tends to have…”
BackgroundImmunizing the Self: Self-Concept Stabilization Through Reality-Adaptive Self-Definitions
Greve, W., & Wentura, D. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167202238370 · Cited by 80
“However, regardless of whether it is the individual’s motive to maintain selfconcept consistency or the need to enhance personal self-esteem that gains predominance (Sedikides, 1993; Sedikides & Skowronski, 2000), in certain cases all kinds of self-defense, reality negotiation, and interpretive neutralization result i…”
BackgroundPfeffer, J., Cialdini, R., Hanna, B. A., & Knopoff, K. (1998) · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2004_8 · Cited by 77
When and why does employee creativity fuel deviance? Key psychological mechanisms.
Ng, T. W. H., & Yam, K.-C. (2019) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000397 · Cited by 77
Burke, P., & Harrod, M. (2005) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/019027250506800404 · Cited by 76
“In another study, Sedikides (1993) found that people preferred to answer questions about themselves to which the answers would enhance rather than confirm their self-views.”
BackgroundAndrews, P. W. (2001) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s1090-5138(00)00059-3 · Cited by 76
“The difference between the attributions of actors and observers is known as the self-serving bias, and it appears to be motivated in large part by strategic self-enhancement (Sedikides, 1993; Sedikides, Campbell, Reeder, & Elliot, 1998).”
BackgroundGreen, J. D., & Sedikides, C. (2004) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/13576500342000059a · Cited by 75
“The former are highly certain, self-descriptive, and important, whereas the latter are much less so (Sedikides, 1993, 1995).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationQuantifying self-motives: Functional links between dispositional desires
Gregg, A. P., Hepper, E. G., & Sedikides, C. (2011) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.827 · Cited by 94
“For example, when self-reflecting in a neutral setting, people ask themselves questions whose answers predominantly (though not invariably) suggest they wish to self-enhance rather than self-verify, and self-verify rather than self-assess (Sedikides, 1993).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDynamics of Identity: Between Self-Enhancement and Self-Assessment
Gregg, A. P., Sedikides, C., & Gebauer, J. E. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_14 · Cited by 103
“…choose to ask themselves questions that yield positive rather than diagnostic or confirmatory answers (i.e., they prioritize selfenhancement; Sedikides, 1993); or they sometimes choose negative confirming feedback over positive disconfirming feedback (i.e., they prioritize…”
BackgroundSelf-citationLambert, S., Loiselle, C., & Macdonald, M. (2009) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/01.ncc.0000343373.01646.91 · Cited by 74
“Although healthcare professionals often assume that patients want as much cancer information as possible, it is important to recognize individual differences in desire for cancer information.(12,19) Not everyone benefits from the same kind of informational support, and healthcare professionals are increasingly encoura…”
BackgroundMnemic neglect and self-threat: Trait modifiability moderates self-protection
Green, J. D., Pinter, B., & Sedikides, C. (2005) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.242 · Cited by 74
“The mnemic neglect model was formerly termed the inconsistency-negativity neglect model by Sedikides and Green (2000). 226 Jeffrey D.”
BackgroundMethodResultSelf-citationAndersen, S. M., Miranda, R., Edwards, T., Arkin, R. M., Lakin, J. L., Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., Brown, R. P., Bosson, J. K., Campbell, W. K., et al. (2001) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1204_2 · Cited by 46
“Four motives have been identified and documented in the self-evaluation literature (Sedikides, 1993; Sedikides & Strube, 1997).”
BackgroundSelf-citationOn The Sources of Self-Knowledge: The Perceived Primacy of Self-Reflection
Sedikides, C., & Skowronski, J. J. (1995) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.1995.14.3.244 · Cited by 79
“sentation of the kind of person we think we are) can: (a) force biases and distortions in autobiographical memories (Ross, 1989; Ross & Conway, 1986); (b) influence theways people perceive and remember other people (Markus, Smith & Moreland, 1985; Sedikides & Skowronski, 1993); (c) lead people to defend themselves aga…”
BackgroundSelf-citationHow people know their risk preference
Arslan, R. C., Brümmer, M., Dohmen, T., Drewelies, J., Hertwig, R., & Wagner, G. G. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72077-5 · Cited by 84
“Domain Mentions Q1 Hazards investments 771 418 investment (242), bought home (86), founded company (15), sold home (13) relationships 760 399 moving (132), conflicts (79), children: general (59), speaking out (44), separation (36), pregnant (26), marriage (24), moving in (14), divorce (13), colleagues (10), affairs (7…”
Changing theories of change: Strategic shifting in implicit theory endorsement.
Leith, S. A., Ward, C. L. P., Giacomin, M., Landau, E. S., Ehrlinger, J. M., & Wilson, A. E. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037699 · Cited by 100
“As expected, participants in the success condition, (M = 6.63, SD = .64) reported that they did better on the test than those in the failure condition (M = 1.56, SD = .85), F(1, 206) = 2403.14, p .001.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialCarlson, E. N. (2016) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000107 · Cited by 85
“A large body of work suggests that people prefer self-enhancing or self-verifying information about themselves rather than accurate information (Sedikides, 1993).”
Dufner, M., Denissen, J. J. A., van Zalk, M. H. W., Matthes, B., Meeus, W., van Aken, M. A. G., & Sedikides, C. (2011) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00742.x · Cited by 89
“, 2006), tasks varying in objective diagnosticity (Sedikides, 1993), tasks requiring self-regulation abilities (Baumeister, Bratslavsky, Muraven, & Tice, 1998), and lie detection skills (Vrij, 2008).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBosson, J. K., Weaver, J. R., & Prewitt-Freilino, J. L. (2011) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298868.2010.513508 · Cited by 85
“In a sense, the research question we pursued here mirrors the question that drove the long-standing “Self-enhancement/Self-verification” debate (eg, Sedikides, 1993 ; Swann, 1990 ) in the self literature: Do people want to be perceived positively, or do they want to be perceived consistently? The answer, that people w…”
BackgroundAnseel, F., & Lievens, F. (2006) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317905x71462 · Cited by 68
“These studies indicated that, while both motives are activated, the self-enhancement motive is typically stronger than the self-verification motive (Bernichon et al., 2003; Sedikides, 1993; Sedikides & Green, 2004; Sedikides & Gregg, 2003; Swann et al., 1989).”
BackgroundPerceived Group Variability in Intergroup Relations: The Distinctive Role of Social Identity
Doosje, B., Spears, R., Ellemers, N., & Koomen, W. (1999) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792779943000017 · Cited by 75
Landau, M. J., Greenberg, J., Sullivan, D., Routledge, C., & Arndt, J. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.013 · Cited by 71
“Consistent with these claims, research shows that people often seek clear and coherent self-conceptions independent of pursuing positive self-evaluations (Sedikides, 1993), although high levels of self-concept structure can support the maintenance of self-esteem (Campbell et al.”
BackgroundEnhancing online rapport experience via augmented reality
Huang, T., Mathews, S. W., & Chou, C. Y. (2019) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-12-2018-0366 · Cited by 99
Kim, Y. K., Yim, M. Y., Kim, E. A., & Reeves, W. (2020) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/jrim-10-2019-0171 · Cited by 99
On the Motives Underlying Social Cognition
Dunning, D. A. (2001) · doi:10.1002/9780470998519.ch16 · Cited by 67
A regulatory focus model of self-evaluation
Leonardelli, G. J., Lakin, J. L., & Arkin, R. M. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.021 · Cited by 73
Self- and Informant-Reported Perspectives on Symptoms of Narcissistic Personality Disorder
Cooper, L. D., Balsis, S., & Oltmanns, T. (2012) · Personality disorders · doi:10.1037/a0026576 · Cited by 68
“And although all individuals tend to self-enhance (e.g., Sedikides, 1993), those with narcissistic features self-enhance more and across a greater number of situations (Campbell, Reeder, Sedikides, & Elliot, 2000), which is perhaps due to the need for a positive self-presentation (Collins & Stukas,…”
BackgroundBiased Reasoning: Adaptive Responses to Health Risk Feedback
Renner, B. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167203261296 · Cited by 71
“Considering positivity and seLf-eonsisteney strivings simultaneously, as suggested by multiple motives conceptions, unexpected negative feedback constitutes the most aversive information (e.g., Jussim, Yen, & Aiello, 1995; Sedikides, 1993; Shrauger, 1975; Stahlberg, Petersen, & Dauenheimer, 1999; Swann & Schroeder, 19…”
BackgroundThe Relationship Between Uncertainty and Desire for Feedback: A Test of Competing Hypotheses1
Anseel, F., & Lievens, F. (2007) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00197.x · Cited by 66
“The uncertainty reduction motive in feedback seeking is also echoed in the self-assessment motive in the self-motives domain in social psychology (Sedikides, 1993; Sedikides & Strube, 1995).”
BackgroundResultCampbell, L., Lackenbauer, S. D., & Muise, A. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167206290383 · Cited by 66
“For instance, Sedikides (1993) has suggested a hierarchical organization of these two motives, with the self-enhancing motive being primary relative to the verifying motive.”
BackgroundEhrlinger, J. M., Plant, E. A., Hartwig, M. K., Vossen, J. J., Columb, C. J., & Brewer, L. E. (2017) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-017-0763-x · Cited by 89
“It is also challenging to improve the accuracy of people ’ s self-views because people ’ s behavior is driven by powerful motives to think positively about the self and to verify their existing self-views more so than by motives to hold accurate views of the self (Sedikides 1993).”
BackgroundMartin, P., Tamblyn, R. M., Ahmed, S., & Tannenbaum, C. (2013) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2013.02.016 · Cited by 66
“A selfassessment component was also introduced, which aimed to promote insight about potential misinformation or beliefs held about benzodiazepine use by providing feedback on incorrect assumptions [18,19].”
BackgroundKeller, J., Ringelhan, S., & Blomann, F. (2011) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2011.604041 · Cited by 81
“…of the participants as indicated by the fact that only a minority of individuals show a strong self-assessment motive of self-evaluation (cf. Sedikides, 1993; Sedikides & Strube, 1997; see also the literature on self-handicapping; Higgins, Snyder, & Berglas, 1990) and many individuals enter…”
BackgroundRelation Between Lack of Forgiveness and Depression
Chung, M.-S. (2016) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/0033294116663520 · Cited by 57
“However, there is also a number of conflicting studies arguing that the effects of low self-esteem on this relationships will be negative, while high self-esteem may lead to other problematic side effects such as excessive narcissism (Baumeister & Vohs, 2001), self-centeredness, lack of concern for others (Seligman, R…”
BackgroundSocial Feedback and Self‐Appraisals: Current Status of the Mead‐Cooley Hypothesis
Lundgren, D. C. (2004) · Symbolic Interaction · doi:10.1525/si.2004.27.2.267 · Cited by 77
Bragging and humblebragging in online reviews
Chen, F., Liu, S. Q., & Mattila, A. S. (2019) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2019.102849 · Cited by 68
Self‐Fulfilling Prophecies: Mechanisms, Power, and Links to Social Problems
Madon, S., Willard, J., Guyll, M., & Scherr, K. C. (2011) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00375.x · Cited by 113
“Self-enhancement theory, for example, proposes that people are motivated to view themselves favorably (Jussim, Yen, & Aiello, 1995; Sedikides, 1993; Sedikides, Gaertner, & Toguchi, 2003; Swann, Pelham, & Krull, 1989).”
The role of perceived control in overcoming defensive self-evaluation
Trope, Y., Gervey, B., & Bolger, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1031(03)00035-0 · Cited by 59
“Defending such beliefs may sometimes play an important role in self-evaluation (see Pelham, 1991; Pelham & Swann, 1994; Sedikedes, 1993; Sedikedes & Strube, 1995, 1997; Swann & Schroeder, 1995; Tesser et al., 1996).”
BackgroundJustice, Emotion, and Identity Theory
Stets, J. E. (2003) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9188-1_8 · Cited by 63
Evaluating the evidence for pancultural self-enhancement
Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & Vevea, J. L. (2007) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-839x.2007.00227.x · Cited by 62
“the better-than-average effect) as the only acceptable measure of self-enhancement, and we have published articles in which we reviewed scores of selfenhancement measures (Sedikides, 1993; Sedikides & Strube, 1997; Gaertner, Sedikides, & Graetz, 1999; Sedikides & Gregg, 2003; Sedikides, Gregg, & Hart, 2007).”
BackgroundSelf-citationGender, Self-Perception, and Academic Problems in High School
Crosnoe, R., Riegle-Crumb, C., & Muller, C. (2007) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.2007.54.1.118 · Cited by 61
“One benefit of this drive is that positive views of the self, even if inaccurate, promote adjustment and, importantly, instill the level of confidence needed to take on and meet new challenges (Baumeister 1998; Sedikides 1993; Taylor 1989).”
BackgroundDose, D. B., Walsh, G., Beatty, S. E., & Elsner, R. (2019) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00635-z · Cited by 60
“As a foundation for this surprising prediction, we draw on self-enhancement theory (e.g., Sedikides 1993) and posit that for more innovative Martin Mende served as Area Editor for this article.”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Sedikides, C.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sedikides, Constantine
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1993-08
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 317-338
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2110287445
- Cited by
- 710
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 11.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- self-assessment, self-enhancement, self-verification, self-knowledge, diagnosticity, positive and negative traits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review