The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior.
Abstract
We propose a new construct called consideration of future consequences (CFC), which is hypothesized to be a stable individual difference in the extent to which people consider distant versus immediate consequences of potential behaviors. Following a description of the construct itself, a measure of this individual difference is developed and validated. Data collected from 7 samples of college students indicates that the measure has acceptable reliability and validity. In addition, evidence of the role of CFC in regulating affective responses to negative events is reviewed. The utility of the CFC construct is demonstrated in 2 studies
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The Consideration of Future Consequences (CFC) scale is a 12-item scale that was developed by Strathman, Gleicher, Boninger, and Scott Edwards (1994) to measure the extent to which individuals consider distant outcomes when choosing their present behavior.”
From The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks (2011) · cites this paper as Strathman, Gleicher, Boninger, and Scott Edwards (1994)
In the citing paper
“To assess reliability, we used the Consideration for Future Consequences scale (Strathman, Gleicher, Boninger, & Edwards, 1994).”
From Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research (2017) · cites this paper as Strathman, Gleicher, Boninger, & Edwards, 1994
Citations
Cites
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Cohen, P., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606266 · Cited by 20,870
Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies.
Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.4.3.219 · Cited by 6,690
The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure
Goldberg, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 · Cited by 5,530
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
Tufte, E. R., Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1979) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2286442 · Cited by 5,214
The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope.
Snyder, C. R., Harris, C., Anderson, J. R., Holleran, S. A., Irving, L. M., Sigmon, S. T., Yoshinobu, L., Gibb, J., Langelle, C., & Harney, P. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.570 · Cited by 3,774
Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives.
Kahneman, D. J., & Miller, D. T. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.93.2.136 · Cited by 3,247
Assessing Reliability and Stability in Panel Models
Wheaton, B., Muthén, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. F. (1977) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270754 · Cited by 3,147
Why People Use Health Services
Rosenstock, I. M. (2005) · Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00425.x · Cited by 2,329
Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis
John, C. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,120
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,002 of 1,002
Zhou, S., Aitken, J. A., & Kuykendall, L. E. (2023) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12459 · Cited by 9
We Will Make You Like Our Research: The Development of a Susceptibility-to-Persuasion Scale
Modic, D., & Anderson, R. J. (2014) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2446971 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 742-752
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2005320215
- Cited by
- 1,782
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 76 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 113 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 122 · 2020: 120 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 115 · 2016: 100 · 2015: 98 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 69
- FWCI
- 12.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- consideration of future consequences, time preference, individual differences, emotion regulation, construct validation, scale development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
