The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships.
Abstract
Three studies describe the development and validation of a measure of the relational-interdependent self-construal, which is defined as the tendency to think of oneself in terms of relationships with close others. Study 1 reports the development, psychometric properties, and tests of validity of this new measure. Individuals who scored high on the Relational-Interdependent Self-Construal (RISC) Scale characterized their important relationships as closer and more committed than did individuals who scored low on this measure (Study 1) and were more likely to take into account the needs and wishes of others when making decisions (Study 2). In Study 3, using a dyadic interaction paradigm with previously unacquainted participants, the partners of persons who scored high on the RISC scale viewed them as open and responsive to their needs and concerns; these perceptions were related to positive evaluations of the relationship.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“More generally, societies that emphasize interdependence rather than independence are more likely to promote relational goals, pay attention to social cues, define the self as embedded within one's social environment and display social context vigilance 92-95 .”
From Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility (2022) · cites this paper as [94]
Citations
Cites
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
The satisfaction with life scale
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · Cited by 31,768
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
James, W. (1891) · Personality Culture Society · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,876
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995
A self-rating depression scale
ZUNG, W. W. K. (1965) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1965.01720310065008 · Cited by 9,813
A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0047358 · Cited by 8,686
Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies.
Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.4.3.219 · Cited by 6,690
Individualism and Collectivism
Hayek, F. A. (1976) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203991718-8 · Cited by 6,060
Social psychology: handbook of basic principles
Higgins, E., & Kruglanski, A. (2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-3496 · Cited by 5,535
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brewer, M. B., & Chen, Y.-R. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.1.133 · Cited by 1,200
Taras, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0018938 · Cited by 1,160
Sprott, D., Czellar, S., & Spangenberg, E. (2009) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.46.1.92 · Cited by 850
The social distance theory of power
Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868312472732 · Cited by 620
Beyond the ‘east–west’ dichotomy: Global variation in cultural models of selfhood.
Vignoles, V. L., Owe, E., Becker, M., Smith, P. B., Easterbrook, M. J., Brown, R., González, R., Didier, N., Carrasco, D., Cadena, M. P., et al. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000175 · Cited by 601
Fitzsimons, G. M., Finkel, E. J., & vanDellen, M. R. (2015) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0039654 · Cited by 448
Uziel, L. (2010) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610369465 · Cited by 348
Need Satisfaction and Well-Being: Testing Self-Determination Theory in Eight Cultures
Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Locke, K. D., Zhang, H., Shen, J., de Jesús Vargas-Flores, J., Ibáñez-Reyes, J., Tanaka-Matsumi, J., Curtis, G. J., Cabrera, H. F., et al. (2013) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022112466590 · Cited by 335
Adler, P. S., & Chen, C. X. (2011) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2011.02.002 · Cited by 329
Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility
Porter, T., Elnakouri, A., Meyers, E. A., Shibayama, T., Jayawickreme, E., & Grossmann, I. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00081-9 · Cited by 248
Hanley, A. W., Nakamura, Y., & Garland, E. L. (2018) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000615 · Cited by 130
Poulin, M. J., Ministero, L. M., Gabriel, S., Morrison, C. D., & Naidu, E. (2021) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976211015184 · Cited by 98
Rohmann, E., Hanke, S., & Bierhoff, H.-W. (2019) · Journal of Individual Differences · doi:10.1027/1614-0001/a000292 · Cited by 77
Creating the sacred from the profane: collective effervescence and everyday activities
Gabriel, S., Naidu, E., Paravati, E., Morrison, C. D., & Gainey, K. (2020) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2019.1689412 · Cited by 61
Gerace, A., Day, A., Casey, S., & Mohr, P. (2017) · Journal of Relationships Research · doi:10.1017/jrr.2017.8 · Cited by 55
The development and validation of the Relational Self-esteem Scale
DU, H., KING, R. B., & CHI, P. (2012) · Scandinavian Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00946.x · Cited by 52
Meditation Effects in the Social Domain: Self-Other Connectedness as a General Mechanism?
Trautwein, F.-M., Naranjo, J. R., & Schmidt, S. (2014) · Studies in Neuroscience, Consciousness and Spirituality · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01634-4_10 · Cited by 45
The Inventory of Subjective Masculinity Experiences: Development and Psychometric Properties
Wong, Y. J., Shea, M., Lafollette, J. R., Hickman, S. J., Cruz, N., & Boghokian, T. (2011) · The Journal of Men’s Studies · doi:10.3149/jms.1903.236 · Cited by 31
The Subjective Masculinity Stress Scale: Scale development and psychometric properties.
Wong, Y. J., Shea, M., Hickman, S. J., LaFollette, J. R., Cruz, N., & Boghokian, T. (2013) · Psychology of Men & Masculinity · doi:10.1037/a0027521 · Cited by 24
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale
Tang, S., Eisma, M. C., Li, J., & Chow, A. Y. M. (2019) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2348 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Cross, S. E., Bacon, P. L., & Morris, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Iowa State University (US)
- ORCID
- Cross, Susan E.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 791-808
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2008656761
- Cited by
- 1,092
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 57
- FWCI
- 17.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r03mh054540-01)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- self-construal, interpersonal relationships, relationship closeness, relationship commitment, dyadic interaction, relationship assessment, scale development, psychometric validation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Self Concept, Social Identification, Social Perception, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
