Cited by 2,797Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionResilience and Mental HealthOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What good are positive emotions in crisis? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001.

Open access
Fredrickson, Barbara L., Tugade, Michele M., Waugh, Christian E., Larkin, Gregory R.·2003·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Extrapolating from B. L. Fredrickson's (1998, 2001) broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions, the authors hypothesized that positive emotions are active ingredients within trait resilience. U.S. college students (18 men and 28 women) were tested in early 2001 and again in the weeks following the September 11th terrorist attacks. Mediational analyses showed that positive emotions experienced in the wake of the attacks--gratitude, interest, love, and so forth--fully accounted for the relations between (a) precrisis resilience and later development of depressive symptoms and (b) precrisis resilience and postcrisis growth in psychological resources. Findings suggest that positive emotions in the aftermath of crises buffer resilient people against depression and fuel thriving, consistent with the broaden-and-build theory. Discussion touches on implications for coping.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.365

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 66 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Anthony, 1987, Risk, vulnerability, and resilience: An overview., 3
  2. Block, 1980, The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the origination of behavior., Vol. 13, 39
  3. 10.1111/0022-4537.701998070 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Cohler, 1987, Adversity, resilience, and the study of lives., 363
  5. Costa, 1992, Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual.
  6. 10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.804 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Demos, 1989, Resiliency in infancy., 3
  8. 10.1111/0022-4537.671998067 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Fredrickson, 2002a, How does religion benefit health and well-being?; Are positive emotions active ingredients?, Psychological Inquiry, 13, 209
  11. Fredrickson, 2002b, Positive emotions., 120
  12. Isen, 2002, A role for neuropsychology in understanding the facilitating influence of positive affect on social behavior and cognitive processes., 528
  13. John, 1990, The "Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in natural language and in questionnaires., 66
  14. Kenny, 1998, Data analysis in social psychology., 233
  15. Kumpfer, 1999, Factors and processes contributing to resilience: The resilience framework., 179
  16. Lewinsohn, 1995, Behavioral theory and treatment of depression., 352
  17. Masten, 1994, Resilience in individual development: Successful adaptation despite risk and adversity., 3
  18. Moos, 1988, Coping Responses Inventory manual.
  19. Moskowitz, 2001, Emotion and coping., 311
  20. Ohman, 2000, Fear and anxiety: Evolutionary, cognitive, and clinical perspectives., 573
  21. 10.1111/0022-4537.651998065 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/0022-4537.661998066 · DOI
  23. 10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.872 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Tennen, 1999, Finding benefits in adversity., 279
  25. Tugade, 2002a, Positive emotions and emotional intelligence., 319
  26. Wolin, 1993, Bound and determined: Growing up resilient in a troubled family.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–135 of 135

Metadata

Authors
Fredrickson, B. L., Tugade, M. M., Waugh, C. E., & Larkin, G. R.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2003-02
Volume
84
Issue
2
Pages
365-376
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W4232057594
Cited by
2,797
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 103 · 2025: 139 · 2024: 167 · 2023: 181 · 2022: 217 · 2021: 255 · 2020: 172 · 2019: 141 · 2018: 143 · 2017: 154 · 2016: 133 · 2015: 124 · 2014: 138 · 2013: 115 · 2012: 118
FWCI
50.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • American Psychological Association
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 59615, R01MH059615)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
positive emotions, resilience, September 11 attacks, terrorism, emotional well-being, post-traumatic stress
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Stress, Psychological, Terrorism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review