Cited by 811Behavioral Health and InterventionsSocial and Intergroup PsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Intellectual performance and ego depletion: Role of the self in logical reasoning and other information processing.

Schmeichel, Brandon J., Vohs, Kathleen D., Baumeister, Roy F.·2003·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Some complex thinking requires active guidance by the self, but simpler mental activities do not. Depletion of the self's regulatory resources should therefore impair the former and not the latter. Resource depletion was manipulated by having some participants initially regulate attention (Studies 1 and 3) or emotion (Study 2). As compared with no-regulation participants who did not perform such exercises, depleted participants performed worse at logic and reasoning (Study 1), cognitive extrapolation (Study 2), and a test of thoughtful reading comprehension (Study 3). The same manipulations failed to cause decrements on a test of general knowledge (Study 2) or on memorization and recall of nonsense syllables (Study 3). Successful performance at complex thinking may therefore rely on limited regulatory resources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.33

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ignoring irrelevant word streams while watching an interview led to worse performance on analytical intelligence measures.

    “ignoring irrelevant word streams while watching a person being interviewed led people to perform worse on measures of analytical intelligence (Schmeichel, Vohs, & Baumeister, 2003).”

    From Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health (2010) · cites this paper as Schmeichel, Vohs, & Baumeister, 2003

  • Engaging in complex thinking is effortful, not automatic, and therefore motivation to exert effort affects performance.

    “Engaging in complex thinking is effortful, not automatic (Schmeichel, Vohs and Baumeister [2003]), and therefore motivation to exert effort affects performance.”

    From Personality Psychology and Economics (2011) · cites this paper as Schmeichel, Vohs and Baumeister [2003]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmeichel, B. J., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F.
Affiliations
Case Western Reserve University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2003
Volume
85
Issue
1
Pages
33-46
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2151091572
Cited by
811
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 54
FWCI
19.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh057039-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 12794, F32MH012794, MH 57039)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
ego depletion, self-regulation, regulatory resources, cognitive performance, logical reasoning, reading comprehension, attentional control, emotion regulation, memory retrieval, general knowledge
MeSH terms
Cognition, Decision Making, Ego, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Logic, Male, Random Allocation, Self Concept, Videotape Recording

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review