Cited by 68Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologySubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral Health and Interventions

Explaining the relationship between religiousness and substance use: Self-control matters.

DeWall, C. Nathan, Pond, Richard S., Carter, Evan C., McCullough, Michael E., Lambert, Nathaniel M., Fincham, Frank D., Nezlek, John B.·2014·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Religiousness is reliably associated with lower substance use, but little research has examined whether self-control helps explain why religiousness predicts lower substance use. Building on prior theoretical work, our studies suggest that self-control mediates the relationship between religiousness and a variety of substance-use behaviors. Study 1 showed that daily prayer predicted lower alcohol use on subsequent days. In Study 2, religiousness related to lower alcohol use, which was mediated by self-control. Study 3 replicated this mediational pattern using a behavioral measure of self-control. Using a longitudinal design, Study 4 revealed that self-control mediated the relationship between religiousness and lower alcohol use 6 weeks later. Study 5 replicated this mediational pattern again and showed that it remained significant after controlling for trait mindfulness. Studies 6 and 7 replicated and extended these effects to both alcohol and various forms of drug use among community and cross-cultural adult samples. These findings offer novel evidence regarding the role of self-control in explaining why religiousness is associated with lower substance use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0036853

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeWall, C. N., Pond, R. S., Carter, E. C., McCullough, M. E., Lambert, N. M., Fincham, F. D., & Nezlek, J. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • University of North Carolina Wilmington (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Brigham Young University (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
  • William & Mary (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2014-08
Volume
107
Issue
2
Pages
339-351
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2123563444
Cited by
68
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4
FWCI
8.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
religiosity, substance use, self-control, alcohol consumption, drug use, daily prayers, mediation, trait mindfulness, cross-cultural comparison, community-dwelling adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Religion, Religion and Psychology, Social Control, Informal, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review