Cited by 39Stress Responses and CortisolHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Emotion Suppression and Acute Physiological Responses to Stress in Healthy Populations: A Quantitative Review of Experimental and Correlational Investigations

Open access
Tyra, Alexandra T., Fergus, Thomas A., Ginty, Annie T.·2024·Health Psychology Review

Abstract

Emotion suppression may be linked to poor health outcomes through elevated stress-related physiology. The current meta-analyses investigate the magnitude of the association between suppression and physiological responses to active psychological stress tasks administered in the laboratory. Relevant articles were identified through Medline, PsychINFO, PubMed, and ProQuest. Studies were eligible if they (a) used a sample of healthy, human subjects; (b) assessed physiology during a resting baseline and active psychological stress task; and (c) measured self-report or experimentally manipulated suppression. Twenty-four studies were identified and grouped within two separate random effects meta-analyses based on study methodology, namely, manipulated suppression (k = 12) and/or self-report (k = 14). Experimentally manipulated suppression was associated with greater physiological stress reactivity compared to controls (Hg = 0.20, 95% CI [0.08, 0.33]), primarily driven by cardiac, hemodynamic, and neuroendocrine parameters. Self-report trait suppression was not associated with overall physiological stress reactivity but was associated with greater neuroendocrine reactivity (r = 0.08, 95% CI [0.01, 0.14]). Significant moderator variables were identified (i.e., type/duration of stress task, nature of control instructions, type of physiology, and gender). This review suggests that suppression may exacerbate stress-induced physiological arousal; however, this may differ based upon the chosen methodological assessment of suppression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17437199.2023.2251559

Cites

139 of 139 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Instructed suppression under laboratory stressors results in greater cardiovascular reactivity, elevated blood pressure, and greater sympathetic activation than non-suppression.

    “Their meta-analysis showed that inhibition under laboratory stressors results in greater cardiovascular reactivity, elevated blood pressure, and greater sympathetic activation than control conditions characterized with non-suppression.”

    From Strong Enough to Suffer: Emotional Suppression, Stress Exposure, and Physiological Health Among Men Across the Life Course (2026) · cites this paper as Tyra et al., 2024

    The Discussion reports greater cardiac and hemodynamic reactivity with instructed suppression and describes activation of the sympathetic-adrenal-medullary (SAM) axis. But it says the hemodynamic finding *suggests* increased blood pressure and/or total peripheral resistance, not that blood pressure was definitively elevated. The Results (Experimental manipulation of suppression) also find no significant increase in the miscellaneous autonomic measures, so the claim overstates the evidence for greater sympathetic activation. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent studies support the idea that expressing negative emotions can facilitate mental and physical health, while suppressing these emotions increases the susceptibility to illness.

    “Recent studies support the idea that expressing negative emotions can facilitate mental and physical health, while suppressing these emotions increases the susceptibility to illness.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tyra, A. T., Fergus, T. A., & Ginty, A. T.
Affiliations
Baylor University (US)
Corresponding author
Tyra, Alexandra T.
Venue
Health Psychology Review
Published
2023-08-30
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
396-420
ISSN
  • 1743-7199 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-7202
OpenAlex
W4386273807
Cited by
39
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K01HL145021)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
emotional suppression, physiological stress reactivity, cardiac reactivity, hemodynamic reactivity, neuroendocrine reactivity, trait emotion regulation, gender differences, healthy adults
MeSH terms
Emotional Regulation, Emotions, Humans, Stress, Psychological, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review