The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contextual Moderation of Racial Bias: The Impact of Social Roles on Controlled and Automatically Activated Attitudes.
Abstract
Three experiments tested the hypothesis that the social roles implied by specific contexts can attenuate or reverse the typical pattern of racial bias obtained on both controlled and automatic evaluation measures. Study 1 assessed evaluations of Black and Asian faces in contexts related to athlete or student roles. Study 2 compared evaluations of Black and White faces in 3 role-related contexts (prisoner, churchgoer, and factory worker). Study 3 manipulated role cues (lawyer or prisoner) within the same prison context. All 3 studies produced significant reversals of racial bias as a function of implied role on measures of both controlled and automatic evaluation. These results support the interpretation that differential evaluations based on Race x Role interactions provide one way that context can moderate both controlled and automatic racial bias.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 2×
“In particular, these measures have been viewed as an improvement over self-report measures, be- cause they are not subject to self-presentation concerns or inaccurate introspection (Nisbett & Wilson, 1977).”
BackgroundAttitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 · Cited by 7,611 · cited 3×
“Of course, such fluctuations in controlled evaluations are to be expected (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1977).”
BackgroundRole congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.109.3.573 · Cited by 7,300
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673
Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013 · Cited by 1,793 · cited 19×
“Initial work indicated that racial bias in the form of stereotyping or prejudice tended to be prevalent at the automatic level, much more so than was indicated by responses on questionnaires and other explicit measures (e.g., Devine, 1989; Fazio et al., 1995; Greenwald et al., 1998; Wittenbrink, Judd, & Park, 1997).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Malleability of Automatic Stereotypes and Prejudice
Blair, I. V. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0603_8 · Cited by 1,152 · cited 1×
“Recently, researchers have found that manipulation of the social context can moderate what was previously thought to be a ubiquitous automatic racial bias favoring the in-group (for a review, see Blair, 2002).”
BackgroundImplicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity
Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., & Banaji, M. R. (2001) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00328 · Cited by 968
Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.262 · Cited by 821 · cited 23×
“Put another way, the presence of an evaluative bias favoring Blacks relative to Asians on a basketball court and a bias favoring Asians relative to Blacks in a classroom shows that race cues had an impact on target evaluations.”
BackgroundInfluentialStereotypes and standards of judgment.
Biernat, M., Manis, M., & Nelson, T. E. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.485 · Cited by 449
Cited by
Attitudes as Object–Evaluation Associations of Varying Strength
Fazio, R. H. (2007) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.603 · Cited by 798
Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: A systems of reasoning analysis.
Rydell, R. J., & McConnell, A. R. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.995 · Cited by 593
The Associative–Propositional Evaluation Model
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2011) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-385522-0.00002-0 · Cited by 426
Arkes, H. R., & Tetlock, P. E. (2004) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1504_01 · Cited by 396
Gallagher, S. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198846345.001.0001 · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- Barden, J., Maddux, W. W., Petty, R. E., & Brewer, M. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-22
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2151924315
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 45.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contextual Moderation of Racial Bias: The Impact of Social Roles on Controlled and Automatically Activated Attitudes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.5
- The paper
- Barden, J., Maddux, W. W., Petty, R. E., & Brewer, M. B. (2004). Contextual Moderation of Racial Bias: The Impact of Social Roles on Controlled and Automatically Activated Attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
