Cited by 243Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Parental discipline and affection and children's prosocial behavior: Genetic and environmental links.

Knafo, Ariel, Plomin, Robert·2006·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

The authors investigated genetic and environmental contributions to the relationships between children's (N=9,319 twin pairs) prosocial behavior and parental positivity and negativity toward them. Children's prosocial behavior was rated by parents at ages 3, 4, and 7 and by teachers at age 7. At each age, parents described their feelings and discipline toward each twin. Parental positivity was indexed by positive feelings and positive, non-coercive discipline, and parental negativity was indexed by negative feelings and coercive, punitive discipline. Genetics and the environment both contributed to individual differences in prosocial behavior and in parenting. At all ages, parental positivity correlated positively, and parental negativity correlated negatively with prosocial behavior. Genetic factors largely mediated the negative correlation between prosocial behavior and parental negativity. Shared environmental effects contributed mainly to the positive relationship between prosocial behavior and parental positivity. This pattern was found both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. The findings point to the importance of children's characteristics and of the parent-child relationship in family processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.147

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knafo, A., & Plomin, R.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2006-01
Volume
90
Issue
1
Pages
147-164
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2100386128
Cited by
243
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 7
FWCI
10.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-44454, R01HD044454)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
prosocial behavior, parental discipline, parental love, parenting, genetic factors, shared environment, twin studies, coercive discipline, parent-child relationship, child development, heritability
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, Female, Genetics, Humans, Infant, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Phenotype, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Twins, Parenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review