The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Single Category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition.
Abstract
The Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT) is a modification of the Implicit Association Test that measures the strength of evaluative associations with a single attitude object. Across 3 different attitude domains--soda brand preferences, self-esteem, and racial attitudes--the authors found evidence that the SC-IAT is internally consistent and makes unique contributions in the ability to understand implicit social cognition. In a 4th study, the authors investigated the susceptibility of the SC-IAT to faking or self-presentational concerns. Once participants with high error rates were removed, no significant self-presentation effect was observed. These results provide initial evidence for the reliability and validity of the SC-IAT as an individual difference measure of implicit social cognition.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The reliability of the SC-IAT is comparable to the usual reliability of IAT measurements [17].”
From Explicit and implicit attachment and the outcomes of acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for depression (2020) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
Cites
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013 · Cited by 1,793
Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept
Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1022 · Cited by 1,393
Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.262 · Cited by 821
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.1002/per.465 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327965pli1504_01 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.925 · DOI
- 10.1037/0003-066X.61.1.27 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.07.003 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.631 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.760 · DOI
- 10.1006/jesp.1999.1418 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0005-7916(02)00024-1 · DOI
- 10.1026//1618-3169.50.2.77 · DOI
- 10.1006/jesp.1997.1331 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225 · DOI
- 10.1038/nn1203-1241 · DOI
- 10.1037/0003-066X.47.6.766 · DOI
- Greenwald, 2001, Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3., Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 85, 10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.85 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0146167203258835 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.774 · DOI
- Kihlstrom, 1990, The psychological unconscious., 445
- 10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_9 · DOI
- Mierke, 2001, Implicit association measurement with the IAT: Evidence for effects of executive control processes., Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 107, 10.1026//0949-3946.48.2.107 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.19.4.395.20759 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.19.6.625.20886 · DOI
- 10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.101 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0146167204271418 · DOI
- Nunnally, 1978, Psychometric theory.
- 10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1477.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.653 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.139 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.494 · DOI
- 10.1027/1618-3169.51.3.165 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/per.531 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.005 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.
Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015575 · Cited by 3,257
“…that several commentators on IAT measures have urged: appraising the construct validity of IAT measures (Arkes & Tetlock, 2004; Blanton & Jaccard, 2006; De Houwer, Teige-Mocigemba, Spruyt, & Moors, in press; Fiedler, Messner, & Bluemke, 2006; Karpinski & Hilton, 2001; Rothermund & Wentura, 2004).”
BackgroundImpulse and Self-Control From a Dual-Systems Perspective
Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Strack, F. (2009) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01116.x · Cited by 1,487
“Everyday life is full of temptations that challenge our capacity for self-control or willpower.”
BackgroundIs Eco-Friendly Unmanly? The Green-Feminine Stereotype and Its Effect on Sustainable Consumption
Brough, A. R., Wilkie, J. E. B., Ma, J., Isaac, M. S., & Gal, D. (2016) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucw044 · Cited by 751
“To do this, we used a Single Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT; Karpinski and Steinman 2006) to measure participants’ implicit attitudes toward the perceived gender-affiliation and greenness of products.”
MethodHofmann, W., Friese, M., & Wiers, R. W. H. J. (2008) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437190802617668 · Cited by 707
“As expected, the SC-IAT predicted consumption behavior in a taste-and-rate task better for participants low rather than high in trait self-control.”
MethodInfluentialImplicit social cognition: from measures to mechanisms
Nosek, B. A., Hawkins, C. B., & Frazier, R. S. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.005 · Cited by 578
Metadata
- Authors
- Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R. B.
- Affiliations
- Temple University (US)
- ORCID
- Karpinski, Andrew
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-32
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W1998043162
- Cited by
- 1,108
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 57
- FWCI
- 107.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- Single Category Implicit Association Test, Implicit Association Test, implicit social cognition, evaluative associations, attitude measurement, self-esteem, racial attitudes, self-presentation, faking, reliability statistics, validity, individual differences
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Association Learning, Attitude, Awareness, Choice Behavior, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Individuality, Internal-External Control, Male, Personality Inventory, Prejudice, Psychometrics, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Students, Reproducibility of Results, Black People, White People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review