Cited by 1,321Social and Intergroup PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and TestingRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site.

Nosek, Brian A., Banaji, Mahzarin R., Greenwald, Anthony G.·2002·Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Respondents at an Internet site completed over 600,000 tasks between October 1998 and April 2000 measuring attitudes toward and stereotypes of social groups. Their responses demonstrated, on average, implicit preference for White over Black and young over old and stereotypic associations linking male terms with science and career and female terms with liberal arts and family. The main purpose was to provide a demonstration site at which respondents could experience their implicit attitudes and stereotypes toward social groups. Nevertheless, the data collected are rich in information regarding the operation of attitudes and stereotypes, most notably the strength of implicit attitudes, the association and dissociation between implicit and explicit attitudes, and the effects of group membership on attitudes and stereotypes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.101

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dementia-related anxiety is likely to be exacerbated by strong implicit negative biases against older adults, culturally embedded age-related stereotypes, and dementia-related stigma.

    “Therefore, based on the existence of strong implicit negative biases against older adults observable in adults of all ages (Nosek et al., 2002), culturally embedded age-related stereotypes (Cuddy et al., 2005), and dementia-related stigma (Moniz-Cook & Manthorpe, 2009; Prince, Bryce, & Ferri, 2011), DRA is likely to be exacerbated.”

    From Correlates of dementia-related anxiety: self-perceived dementia risk and ageism (2020) · cites this paper as Nosek et al., 2002

  • Most negative attitudes toward aging relate to older adults' cognitive abilities, and these attitudes can occur without any indication of cognitive decline.

    “Furthermore, most of the negative attitudes towards aging are related to cognitive abilities of older adults, and these negative attitudes can occur even without any indication of cognitive decline (Cuddy et al., 2005; Nosek et al., 2002; Whitbourne & Seed, 2002), and age is, indeed, the biggest risk factor for dementia (Chen, Lin, & Chen, 2009).”

    From Correlates of dementia-related anxiety: self-perceived dementia risk and ageism (2020) · cites this paper as Nosek et al., 2002

  • Firmly embedded age-related stereotypes are prevalent across different groups of people.

    “Nosek, Banaji, and Greenwald (2002) reported that firmly embedded age-related stereotypes are prevalent across different groups of people.”

    From Correlates of dementia-related anxiety: self-perceived dementia risk and ageism (2020) · cites this paper as Nosek, Banaji, and Greenwald (2002)

  • Many people hold strong negative attitudes toward older adults, especially regarding their memory ability.

    “Previous studies have revealed that many people hold strong negative attitudes toward older adults, especially in regards to their memory ability (Cuddy et al., 2005; Nosek et al., 2002; Whitbourne & Seed, 2002)”

    From Correlates of dementia-related anxiety: self-perceived dementia risk and ageism (2020) · cites this paper as Nosek et al., 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice
Published
2002-03
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
101-115
ISSN
  • 1089-2699 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7802
OpenAlex
W2066255970
Cited by
1,321
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 73 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 84 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 48
FWCI
116.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
implicit attitudes, stereotypes, social groups, group membership, gender stereotypes, racial stereotypes, age stereotypes, Implicit Association Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review