The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual differences in adult decision-making competence.
Open accessAbstract
The authors evaluated the reliability and validity of a set of 7 behavioral decision-making tasks, measuring different aspects of the decision-making process. The tasks were administered to individuals from diverse populations. Participants showed relatively consistent performance within and across the 7 tasks, which were then aggregated into an Adult Decision-Making Competence (A-DMC) index that showed good reliability. The validity of the 7 tasks and of overall A-DMC emerges in significant relationships with measures of socioeconomic status, cognitive ability, and decision-making styles. Participants who performed better on the A-DMC were less likely to report negative life events indicative of poor decision making, as measured by the Decision Outcomes Inventory. Significant predictive validity remains when controlling for demographic measures, measures of cognitive ability, and constructive decision-making styles. Thus, A-DMC appears to be a distinct construct relevant to adults' real-world decisions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, previous research has indicated some degree of common variance among them (Bruine de Bruin, Parker, & Fischhoff, 2007;Finucane & Gullion, 2010;Klaczynski, 2001;Parker & Fischhoff, 2005;Slugoski, Shields, & Dawson, 1993;Stanovich & West, 1998c, 2000;West, Toplak, & Stanovich, 2008).”
From The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks (2011) · cites this paper as Bruine de Bruin, Parker, & Fischhoff, 2007
In the citing paper
“These results converge with a body of other work indicating that the susceptibility to these biases varies considerably (Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007;Cokely & Kelley, 2009;Del Missier, Mantyla, & Bruine de Bruine, 2010;Dohmen, Falk, Huffman, Marklein, & Sunde, 2009;Klaczynski, 2001;Oechssler et al., 2009;Stanovich & West, 1998a, 1998c, 1999, 2000, 2008b;West et al., 2008).”
From The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks (2011) · cites this paper as Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007
In the citing paper
“Recent work on individual differences in cognitive function has begun to challenge this assumption (Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007;Oechssler et al., 2009;Stanovich, 2009bStanovich, , 2011;;Stanovich & West, 2007, 2008a, 2008b).”
From The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks (2011) · cites this paper as Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532 · cited 1×
“15 A moderation test using hierarchical regression (Baron & Kenny, 1986) shows that adding the interactions of the A-DMC with recruitment site and with highest level of education completed to the main effects improves predictions of the DOI ( R2 .02), F(2, 310) 3.37, p .05.”
MethodInfluentialCoefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497 · cited 3×
“50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% just guessing absolutely sure”
BackgroundConstruct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195 · cited 2×
“which “the measure fits lawfully into a network of expected relationships” (Nunnally & Bernstein, 1994, p. 91; see also Cronbach & Meehl, 1955 ).”
BackgroundJudgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
Shafer, G. R., Kahnerman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288362 · Cited by 5,658
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116 · Cited by 5,359 · cited 2×
“In addition, the cognitive style of “need for cognition,” capturing the tendency to think hard about problems (Cacioppo & Petty, 1982), has been associated with having fewer framing errors (Smith & Levin, 1996), suggesting that it may facilitate discovering the deep structure shared by different…”
BackgroundIndividual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00003435 · Cited by 4,481
(1998) · Cited by 4,172
Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990) · Successful Aging · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511665684.003 · Cited by 3,739 · cited 1×
“…whereas the other view posits that older individuals have knowledge and experience that allows them to be more selective, domain specific, and automatized in their problem solving (cf. Baltes & Baltes, 1990; Denney, 1989; Salthouse, 1991), which may make up for any impaired cognitive abilities.”
Background
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 902
"Measurement, Consequences, and Debiasing of Correspondent Inference Making"
Scopelliti, I., Morewedge, C. K., Min, L., McCormick, E. N., & Kassam, K. (2016) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2016.279 · Cited by 3
“Individual differences in decision making appear to be prevalent (Baron and Ritov, 2004; Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007; Scopelliti et al., 2015), but their implications have often been overlooked.”
Gomes, A. M. R. (2008) · Nelson Mandela University Research Repository · Cited by 3
Shu, S. (2018) · University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) · Cited by 3
Financial Literacy, Experience, and Age Differences in Monetary Sequence Preferences
Wilson, J. M. (2019) · doi:10.33915/etd.3864 · Cited by 3
Quicksand or Bedrock for Behavioral Economics? Assessing Foundational Empirical QuestionsPreprint
Stango, V., Yoong, J., & Zinman, J. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3195232 · Cited by 3
Reputational Rationality TheoryPreprint
Dorison, C. A. (2023) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/q27sj · Cited by 3
Yi, K., Wang, X., Wu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2025) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-025-02607-1 · Cited by 2
Assessing judges' use and awareness of cognitive heuristic decision-making
Malegiannaki, A.-C., Chatzopoulos, A., & Tsagkaridis, K. (2025) · Frontiers in Cognition · doi:10.3389/fcogn.2025.1421488 · Cited by 4
Grimm, J., & Richter, T. (2025) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-025-01000-1 · Cited by 4
“Furthermore, measures of rational thinking skills have been found to predict variables such as negative life events (Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007), epistemically suspect beliefs (Erceg et al., 2019) and university academic success (Grimm & Richter, 2024), even when controlling for fluid…”
Oh, J., Chen, P.-Y., Hsing, H., Lau, N. K. C., Wu, P. A., Srivastava, K., Gurney, N., Molinaro, K. A., & Trent, S. A. (2025) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/10711813251371034 · Cited by 2
“The psychometrics questionnaires include three sections of the Adult Decision-Making Competence (A-DMC; Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007) Questionnaire, the General Risk Propensity Scale (GRiPS; Zhang et al., 2019), and 15 selected questions from the Big Five Inventory (BFI; John, 1999).”
Blanchard, M. D., Aidman, E., Stankov, L., & Kleitman, S. (2025) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-025-00655-0 · Cited by 2
“Prior research suggests this is likely, given that individual intelligence tends to relate to group performance on well-structured tasks (Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007, 2012, 2019; Del Missier et al., 2012).”
Cognitive Bias and the Impact of Age on Sports Betting
Dwyer, B., Goebert, C., Shapiro, S. L., & Gupta, K. (2025) · Sport Marketing Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10616934251391619 · Cited by 4
“Con fi rmation bias has been measured on one dimension (Frederick, 2005), though 15 unrelated tasks (Toplak et al., 2011), as well as with seven factors (Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007).”
Training and Transfer of Executive Functions for police- and Military Related Tasks
Spiegel, C. B., & Sutter, C. (2025) · Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology · doi:10.1007/s11896-025-09789-9 · Cited by 2
“For measuring decision-making competencies, the two tasks Applying Decision Rules (ADR) and Consistency in Risk Perception (CRP) of the Adult Decision Making Compe - tence battery (Bruine de Bruin et al. 2007) were applied.”
Desolda, G., Greco, F., Lanzilotti, R., & Tucci, C. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3829371 · Cited by 5
Measuring Decision-Making Regret Among French Populations
Bonaccio, S., & Girard, A. J. (2014) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000219 · Cited by 2
The Attitude-Behavior Discrepancy in Medical Decision Making
He, F., Li, D., Cao, R. Z., Zeng, J., & Guan, H. (2014) · Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal · doi:10.5812/ircmj.14612 · Cited by 2
“In the past 30 years, framing effect has been considered as a key issue in behavioral decision making research (6).”
BackgroundMuñoz, Ó. A. A. (2021) · TEC Empresarial · doi:10.18845/te.v15i2.5720 · Cited by 2
When even the smartest fail to prioritise: overuse of information can decrease decision accuracy
Aßmann, L., Betsch, T., Lang, A., & Lindow, S. (2022) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2022.2055560 · Cited by 3
“Research shows that cognitive ability influences decision accuracy (e.g. Bröder, 2003; Bröder & Newell, 2008; Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007; Cokely & Kelley, 2009; Jackson et al., 2017; Stanovich & West, 2000).”
BackgroundDecision-Making Styles and Decision Outcomes
Bavoľár, J. (2023) · Integrated science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-15959-6_22 · Cited by 3
The Equity Framework: Fairness Beyond Equalized Predictive Outcomes
Naggita, K., & Aguma, J. C. (2023) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/faia230083 · Cited by 6
Roanghesi, C. (2024) · Psihologia Resurselor Umane · doi:10.24837/pru.v22i1.557 · Cited by 2
CEO conscientiousness and asymmetric SG&A cost behavior
Jeon, H.-J., Ra, K., & Kim, J. (2024) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2024.2385752 · Cited by 2
“Decision-making ability (Bruine de Bruin, Parker, and Fischhoff 2007; Dewberry, Juanchich, and Narendran 2013), decision-making style (Riaz, Riaz, and Batool 2012), and risk-taking behaviour (Lauriola and Levin 2001) are just few of the many outcomes that have been linked to specific personality…”
Breuer, L.-E., Lindow, S., & Betsch, T. (2024) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104470 · Cited by 2
Zhao, S., Wu, S., Liang, H., & Zhang, H. (2025) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113168 · Cited by 2
Cosenza, M., Pizzini, B., Ciccarelli, M., Sacco, M., & Nigro, G. (2025) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108414 · Cited by 2
Effects of “green nudges” on renovation waste management: a randomized controlled experiment
Yi, H., Lu, W., Yuan, L., & Bao, Z. (2025) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/ecam-03-2025-0341 · Cited by 2
Validation study of the Korean version of the Decision Making Style Inventory(K-DMI)
임혜빈 (2016) · The Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology · doi:10.21074/kjlcap.2016.17.3.441 · Cited by 2
Age Differences in Decision Making
Strough, J., de Bruin, W. B., & Wilson, J. M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108552684.014 · Cited by 3
Thinking About Decisions: How Human Variability Influences Decision-Making
McElroy, T., Salapska-Gelleri, J., Schuller, K. L., & Bourgeois, M. J. (2023) · Integrated science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-15959-6_23 · Cited by 4
Gayer, C. C. (2013) · UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) · Cited by 2
Life regrets and life satisfaction in mature adults
Pethtel, O. L., & Chen, Y. (2014) · Cited by 2
Decision-Making Competence, Life Regrets, and Subjective Well-Being in Mature Adults
Pethtel, O. L. (2012) · ScholarWorks@BGSU (Bowling Green State University) · Cited by 2
Thematic elements underlying risk perception amongst small and medium enterprise owner-managers
Ojiako, U., Chipulu, M., Marshall, A. J., & Baboolall, P. (2014) · Acta Commercii · doi:10.4102/ac.v14i1.199 · Cited by 2
Decision-Making During the Deployment Cycle
Martindale-Adams, J. L., Nichols, L. O., Zuber, J. K., Graney, M. J., & Burns, R. A. (2016) · The Family Journal · doi:10.1177/1066480716648686 · Cited by 2
McKivor, L. A. C. (2016) · Scholarship@Western (Western University) · Cited by 2
STUDENTS’ BEHAVIOURAL PATTERNS ON BACHELOR’S DEGREE CHOICES IN SRI LANKA: HEURISTICS?
Abeygunawardena, K. A. V. (2019) · PEOPLE International Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.20319/pijss.2019.43.763785 · Cited by 2
Ours is not to reason why: Information seeking across domains.
Vonk, J. M., Brothers, B., & Zeigler‐Hill, V. (2020) · Psychology of Religion and Spirituality · doi:10.1037/rel0000304 · Cited by 2
Effect of Emotion in Information Processing for Decision-Making
Pathak, S., & Srivastava, K. B. L. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48849-9_1 · Cited by 2
Performance asessment to measure students’ explanations in chemistry learning
Utami, B., Saputro, S., Ashadi, A., & Masykuri, M. (2021) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012028 · Cited by 2
Expanding Horizons in Business Decision Making
Dabab, M., Freiling, M., & Sagalowicz, D. (2021) · doi:10.1109/temscon-eur52034.2021.9488619 · Cited by 2
Determinants of Male Involvement in Family Planning Services in Tarime District, Tanzania
Machinda, Z., Mbonile, M. J., & Mtae, H. (2020) · Tanzania Journal for Population studies and Development · doi:10.56279/tjpsd.v27i2.114 · Cited by 2
“In this regard, those male partners who participated in FP services at any time of their life were likely to continue using the services for the consecutive pregnancies of their wives (De bruin et al. 2007).”
BackgroundDefining cognitive sophistication in the development of judgment and decision-making
Toplak, M. E. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-816636-9.00010-4 · Cited by 2
Hanson, M. B. (2021) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13378 · Cited by 2
“Finally, decision‐making skill is tested based on how well consumers can utilize standardized and quantified ratings of performance to make consumer decisions, based on a hypothetical (and non‐ health‐related) consumer choice task.(26) Those with better decision‐ making capabilities are also expected to upgrade the sa…”
BackgroundNumber sense, trading decisions and mispricing: An experiment
Roger, T., Roger, P., & Willinger, M. (2021) · Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control · doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2021.104293 · Cited by 2
Zhang, H., Wei, S., Wang, Y., & Feng, J. (2022) · Brain Imaging and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11682-022-00656-3 · Cited by 2
“Therefore, the maximizer may be more concerned with their relative position, and their decision-making may be dependent on others (Wandi Bruine De Bruin et al., 2007).”
BackgroundNavarro-Conticello, J., & Moyano‐Díaz, E. (2022) · Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento ( RACC ) · doi:10.32348/1852.4206.v14.n2.30827 · Cited by 2
Sartori, R., Ceschi, A., & Scalco, A. R. (2014) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07593-8_10 · Cited by 2
Addressing Challenges of Planning in Multimodal Transportation Nodes with Simulation Games
Freese, M., Kurapati, S., Lukosch, H. K., Groen, D., Kortmann, R., & Verbraeck, A. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78795-4_18 · Cited by 2
“Some of the quantitative research instruments were: • NEO-FFI-30 (Körner et al. 2008) • STCI-T (60) (Ruch et al. 1997) • FIT (Mohiyeddini 2001) • A-DMC (Bruine de Bruin et al. 2007) • Pre- and post-questionnaire about simulation games (modified from Maij et al. 2015).”
Rabbani, A. G., Grable, J. E., Woodyard, A. S., & Yao, Z. (2023) · Financial Services Review · doi:10.61190/fsr.v27i3.3395 · Cited by 2
Nkiko, C. M. (2013) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 2
Age, Expertise, and the Sunk-Cost Fallacy
Karns, T. E. (2012) · The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) · doi:10.33915/etd.3486 · Cited by 2
“Participants then completed the Resistance to Sunk Costs measure (Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007; see Appendix E) followed by the Subjective Numeracy Scale (Fagerlin et al., 2007; see Appendix F) and a demographics questionnaire (see Appendix G).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBatool, U., & Siddiqui, D. A. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3641615 · Cited by 2
Teaching Critical in Higher Education
Janssen, E. M. (2020) · doi:10.33540/351 · Cited by 2
Mandel, D. R. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/c5bf4 · Cited by 2
Measuring individual differences in the depth of planningPreprint
Felso, V., & Lieder, F. (2022) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/xmf3y · Cited by 3
Exploring the Sources of Variance in Risky Decision Making with Large Language ModelsPreprint
Bhatia, S. (2023) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/3hrnc · Cited by 2
Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity and Stress as Predictors of Decision Making
Reinerman-Jones, L., Parchment, A., Matthews, G., Barber, D. J., Lackey, S. J., & Teo, G. W. L. (2014) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931214581206 · Cited by 1
“Traditional questionnaires that measure decision making, such the ADMC (Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007), categorize responses into correct or incorrect answers.”
BackgroundVolver a Pensar la Educación Pública
Ansión, J. (2011) · Revista Peruana de Investigación Educativa · doi:10.34236/rpie.v3i3.16 · Cited by 1
Critical Analysis and the Impact of Big Data within the Organisation
Sekgweleo, T., Makovhololo, P., & Makovhololo, M. L. (2020) · Management and Organizational Studies · doi:10.5430/mos.v6n2p30 · Cited by 1
Toplak, M. E. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-816636-9.00001-3 · Cited by 1
Does Premium Version Adoption in mHealth Improve User Engagement and Health-Related Outcomes?
Jiang, Y., Uetake, K., & Yang, N. (2026) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2022.0437 · Cited by 1
Khosravi, S., Kogler, L., Khosrowabadi, R., Hashemi, T., Derntl, B., & Heysieattalab, S. (2026) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2026.107860 · Cited by 1
She wants the best: Maximizing tendency, work‐to‐family enrichment and female employee adaptivity
Jia, H., & Li, M. (2023) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.12598 · Cited by 1
Hameed, M., Sani, N., Sharif, A., Malik, M. A., Ihsan, H., Jafri, K. S., Rashid, F. S., Bungish, M. K., Sami, A., Ehsan, T., et al. (2025) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.82598 · Cited by 1
“It was developed with the Decision Outcome Inventory (DOI) (Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007), which assesses whether individuals reach satisfactory outcomes [20].”
Personality and good business judgement: the bright and dark side of business reasoning
Furnham, A. F., & Sherman, R. A. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1565485 · Cited by 1
Paul, T. S., Benesch, D., Li, J., Lafond, D., Marois, A., Paré, S., & Krätzig, G. P. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-92967-0_16 · Cited by 1
Gregory, C., & Banks, A. P. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-07999-2 · Cited by 1
“Scales currently exist that can be used to measure a participant’s trait decision making process preferences, or the style they tend to use most often in their lives (Betsch, 2004; De Bruin et al., 2007; Hsee et al., 2015; Pacini & Epstein, 1999; Pretz et al., 2014; Scott & Bruce, 1995).”
IQ, genes, and miscalibrated expectations.
Dawson, C. (2025) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000567 · Cited by 3
Tanner, B., Cokely, E. T., & Feltz, A. (2025) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/jdm.2025.10 · Cited by 1
Sunk-cost fallacy across real and hypothetical decision making in younger and older adults
Pighin, S., Timberlake, B., & Tentori, K. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-08059-5 · Cited by 1
“…to be easily represented mentally or empathized with (as seen in the scenarios included in the Adult Decision-Making Competence index proposed by Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007, and widely used in subsequent studies), these fictitious decision situations introduce some issues, even beyond sunk…”
Anxious Decisions: Suggestibility Mediates Neuroticism's Impact on Decision-Making Styles
Raturi, A. K., Jena, S. P. K., & Sharma, N. (2025) · Imagination Cognition and Personality · doi:10.1177/02762366251362795 · Cited by 1
“The GDMS has been validated and utilized in numerous studies, demonstrating correlations with decision-making competence (Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007), job satisfaction (Crossley & Highhouse, 2005), job fi t (Singh & Greenhaus, 2004), stress levels (Thunholm, 2008), and student real-life decisions,…”
Leon, T., Weidemann, G., & Bailey, P. E. (2025) · European Journal of Ageing · doi:10.1007/s10433-025-00887-5 · Cited by 2
“Avoidant decision-making style is associated with lesser decision-making competence, while the rational decision-making style is related to greater decision-making competence (Bruine de Bruin et al. 2007).”
Father-Daughter Relationship, Self-Confidence, and Decision Making; A Serial Mediation Model
Jan, T., Yaseen, F., & Miran, A. (2025) · The Family Journal · doi:10.1177/10664807251384192 · Cited by 1
Ge, Y., Dou, W., Wu, Y., Zhou, D., Guo, Y., & Zang, F. (2025) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-025-03752-1 · Cited by 1
“Indeed, experimental studies have shown that the higher-order cognition required in school improves risk assessment and decision-making skills (Bruine De Bruin et al., 2007 ; Hoffmann & Muttarak, 2017; Peters et al., 2006 ).”
Cao, J., Yang, S., & Zhou, C. (2026) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2026.108277 · Cited by 1
Multifaceted Declines in Everyday Decision-Making in Older Adults: A Think-Aloud Study
Perry, S. J., Roberts, K. L., Atkin, C., Badham, S. P., & Al‐Janabi, H. (2026) · Journal of Applied Gerontology · doi:10.1177/07334648261440714 · Cited by 1
Exploiting Loss Aversion Disrupts Skilled Attackers in a Realistic Cyber Range
Gutzwiller, R. S., Bhat, R., Guarino, S. L., Clegg, B. A., Lynn, S. K., Kwan, V., Hypolite, J., Sieffert, M., Locasto, M. E., Kelle, D., et al. (2026) · Computational Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1007/s42113-026-00297-5 · Cited by 1
Clear decisions: improved perceptual clarity reduces age-related decision-making deficits
Atkin, C., Al‐Janabi, H., Badham, S. P., Perry, S., & Roberts, K. L. (2026) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbag082 · Cited by 1
“The fixed order ensured a clear gap between the first and second sets of decision-making questions and mirrored the fixed order of tasks in the Adult Decision Making Competence test (Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007).”
InfluentialAtasoy, Ş., Tüzün, Ö. Y., Çalık, M., Tekbıyık, A., & Erdoğan, S. C. (2026) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-026-00754-4 · Cited by 1
Welk, A. K., & Mayhorn, C. B. (2015) · Symposium and Bootcamp on Science of Security · doi:10.1145/2746194.2746204 · Cited by 1
A Heurística do Afeto e o Conceito de “Avaliabilidade”: Experimentos no Contexto Brasileiro
Ávila, M. G., & FARIAS, P. F. D. (2013) · ReMark - Revista Brasileira de Marketing · doi:10.5585/remark.v12i2.2487 · Cited by 1
A comparative study on young-adult decision-making behaviour in regions within Malaysia
Keoy, K. H., Yee, A. S. L., & Hassan, P. F. (2011) · International Journal of Business Competition and Growth · doi:10.1504/ijbcg.2012.044056 · Cited by 1
Romano, J. M., & Platania, J. (2014) · Roger Williams University - Digital Commons (Roger Williams University) · Cited by 1
Assessing multidimensional complex decision making with Situational Judgment Tests
Reinerman-Jones, L., & Teo, G. W. L. (2016) · IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support · doi:10.1109/cogsima.2016.7497785 · Cited by 1
“Compared to the other skills assessed by the A-DMC, these two decision making competencies rely more on cognitive reasoning and correlate with fluid and crystallized intelligence [15], and were identified as the more “cognitive” decision competencies [16].”
Beckstein, A. S. (2015) · Cited by 1
Yu, J., & Rao, L. (2014) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2014.00668 · Cited by 1
van Hoogdalem, L. E., Siemes, C., Lugtenburg, P. J., Busschbach, J. J. V., & Ismail, S. Y. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026505 · Cited by 1
“21 Competence contains the patient’s ability to understand that their choices have consequences.”
BackgroundEmployees’ Attitudes toward Ethical Behaviour at Work: Impact of Their Individual Characteristics
Žardeckaitė–Matulaitienė, K., Endriulaitienė, A., & Naujokaitienė, J. (2014) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9781848882508_010 · Cited by 1
The effect of work experience and rigidity on the escalation of commitments in investment decisions
Susilojati, I. A., Hidayat, W., & Wihadanto, A. (2020) · Sebelas Maret Business Review · doi:10.20961/smbr.v5i1.42404 · Cited by 1
(2021) · Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government · doi:10.47750/cibg.2021.27.03.201 · Cited by 1
“…of decision-making as well as styles of decision-making, the precursor variables that may forecast valid decision-making, and the prognostic soundness of balanced reaction (Parker and Fischhoff, 2005; Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007; Appelt et al., 2011; Weller & Tikir, 2011; Weller et al., 2015).”
BackgroundKhemka, I. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74675-9_23 · Cited by 1
Survival communication under uncertainty and complexity: A review
Park, H. (2022) · International Journal of ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES · doi:10.21833/ijaas.2022.06.017 · Cited by 1
A reassessment of the Resistance to Framing scale
Geiger, S. J., Vintr, J., & Rachev, N. R. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01876-7 · Cited by 1
Viteková, L., & Václavíková, I. (2022) · Slovak Journal of Political Sciences · doi:10.34135/sjps.220102 · Cited by 1
Krawczyk, M. W., & Rachubik, J. (2022) · Decision · doi:10.1037/dec0000188 · Cited by 1
Rational thinking and Little’s Law understanding: an empirical study
Hendijani, R. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-04004-y · Cited by 1
Maximizers’ Susceptibility to the Effect of Frequency vs. Percentage Format in Risk Representation
Misuraca, R., Faraci, P., & Abbate, C. S. (2022) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs12120496 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B.
- Affiliations
- RAND Corporation (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 938-956
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2039223548
- Semantic Scholar
- 22168bbc83ed5c1b933d71c3f881dc85b0709321
- Cited by
- 906
- References
- 110
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 12.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- KiltHub Repository
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (SES-0213782)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- individual differences, construct validity, predictive validity, socioeconomic status, cognitive ability, decision-making styles, negative life events
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aptitude, Culture, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Individuality, Intelligence, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Problem Solving, Psychometrics, Self Concept, Social Values, Socioeconomic Factors, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review