The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual differences in adult decision-making competence.
Open accessAbstract
The authors evaluated the reliability and validity of a set of 7 behavioral decision-making tasks, measuring different aspects of the decision-making process. The tasks were administered to individuals from diverse populations. Participants showed relatively consistent performance within and across the 7 tasks, which were then aggregated into an Adult Decision-Making Competence (A-DMC) index that showed good reliability. The validity of the 7 tasks and of overall A-DMC emerges in significant relationships with measures of socioeconomic status, cognitive ability, and decision-making styles. Participants who performed better on the A-DMC were less likely to report negative life events indicative of poor decision making, as measured by the Decision Outcomes Inventory. Significant predictive validity remains when controlling for demographic measures, measures of cognitive ability, and constructive decision-making styles. Thus, A-DMC appears to be a distinct construct relevant to adults' real-world decisions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, previous research has indicated some degree of common variance among them (Bruine de Bruin, Parker, & Fischhoff, 2007;Finucane & Gullion, 2010;Klaczynski, 2001;Parker & Fischhoff, 2005;Slugoski, Shields, & Dawson, 1993;Stanovich & West, 1998c, 2000;West, Toplak, & Stanovich, 2008).”
From The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks (2011) · cites this paper as Bruine de Bruin, Parker, & Fischhoff, 2007
In the citing paper
“These results converge with a body of other work indicating that the susceptibility to these biases varies considerably (Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007;Cokely & Kelley, 2009;Del Missier, Mantyla, & Bruine de Bruine, 2010;Dohmen, Falk, Huffman, Marklein, & Sunde, 2009;Klaczynski, 2001;Oechssler et al., 2009;Stanovich & West, 1998a, 1998c, 1999, 2000, 2008b;West et al., 2008).”
From The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks (2011) · cites this paper as Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007
In the citing paper
“Recent work on individual differences in cognitive function has begun to challenge this assumption (Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007;Oechssler et al., 2009;Stanovich, 2009bStanovich, , 2011;;Stanovich & West, 2007, 2008a, 2008b).”
From The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks (2011) · cites this paper as Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532 · cited 1×
“15 A moderation test using hierarchical regression (Baron & Kenny, 1986) shows that adding the interactions of the A-DMC with recruitment site and with highest level of education completed to the main effects improves predictions of the DOI ( R2 .02), F(2, 310) 3.37, p .05.”
MethodInfluentialCoefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497 · cited 3×
“50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% just guessing absolutely sure”
BackgroundConstruct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195 · cited 2×
“which “the measure fits lawfully into a network of expected relationships” (Nunnally & Bernstein, 1994, p. 91; see also Cronbach & Meehl, 1955 ).”
BackgroundJudgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
Shafer, G. R., Kahnerman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288362 · Cited by 5,658
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116 · Cited by 5,359 · cited 2×
“In addition, the cognitive style of “need for cognition,” capturing the tendency to think hard about problems (Cacioppo & Petty, 1982), has been associated with having fewer framing errors (Smith & Levin, 1996), suggesting that it may facilitate discovering the deep structure shared by different…”
BackgroundIndividual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00003435 · Cited by 4,481
(1998) · Cited by 4,172
Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990) · Successful Aging · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511665684.003 · Cited by 3,739 · cited 1×
“…whereas the other view posits that older individuals have knowledge and experience that allows them to be more selective, domain specific, and automatized in their problem solving (cf. Baltes & Baltes, 1990; Denney, 1989; Salthouse, 1991), which may make up for any impaired cognitive abilities.”
Background
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 902
Pathak, S., Srivastava, K. B. L., & Dewangan, R. L. (2023) · Japanese Psychological Research · doi:10.1111/jpr.12466 · Cited by 1
Ile, C. M., & Nnonyelu, O. G. (2023) · EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR) · doi:10.36713/epra13877 · Cited by 1
Cash and in-kind transfers in India: contexts, preferences and evidence
Das, A., & Sethi, N. (2023) · International Journal of Social Economics · doi:10.1108/ijse-03-2023-0158 · Cited by 4
Li, D., Li, Y., Gao, S., & He, Y. (2024) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112661 · Cited by 1
Boundary conditions of the rational model: Finding the limits of rationality
Steel, P., & Hendijani, R. (2024) · Advances in motivation science · doi:10.1016/bs.adms.2024.03.002 · Cited by 4
Muntwiler, C., Eppler, M. J., Unfried, M., & Buder, F. (2024) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-11-2022-0793 · Cited by 3
Sunk cost effects for thee but not for me: Decisions and predictions involving others
Chen, Z., Güney, Ş., & John, R. S. (2024) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104557 · Cited by 1
McMillan, S. J., Venticinque, J. S., & Toglia, M. P. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192882578.003.0011 · Cited by 1
The green decision maker: Restoring decision making through exposure to environmental stimuli
Stragà, M., Mäntylä, T., de Bruin, W. B., Florean, I., Zambon, D., & Missier, F. D. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102506 · Cited by 1
The Wheels of Scientific Progress: Integrative Theory Building in Decision Science
Betsch, T., & Bröder, A. (2025) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie · doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000605 · Cited by 2
Loss Aversion and Perspective Taking in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy
Tait, V. (2015) · ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) · Cited by 1
Is Endorsing Gambling as an Escape More a Trait or a State?
Weatherly, J. N., Petros, T. V., & Jónsdóttir, H. L. (2016) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-016-9487-2 · Cited by 1
Matthews, G., Reinerman-Jones, L., Teo, G. W. L., Burke, S., & Scribner, D. R. (2017) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60747-4_7 · Cited by 3
Yılmaz, H. (2018) · Universal Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.13189/ujer.2018.060812 · Cited by 1
“They tend to be systematic and organized when solving problems or making decisions [28].”
BackgroundRelationship between Decision Making Styles and Life Regrets among Community Dwelling Older Adults
Gaafar, M., AbdElsalam, R. M. M., & ElKholy, S. E. A.-E. (2018) · Alexandria Scientific Nursing Journal · doi:10.21608/asalexu.2018.207734 · Cited by 1
“Decision outcomes assist in building inferences about the older adults' decision making style((3)).”
BackgroundInfluentialRachev, N. R., & Petkova, M. (2019) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/15685373-12340062 · Cited by 1
Areas of Improvement in Hungarian SMEs Competitiveness – Corporate Financial Literacy in Focus
Tóth, R., & Gyurcsik, P. (2019) · Polgári szemle · doi:10.24307/psz.2020.0233 · Cited by 1
Smartphone Brand Loyalty and Consumer Heterogeneity
Susilowati, E., & Putra, M. G. A. (2020) · Management Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies · doi:10.7595/management.fon.2020.0007 · Cited by 1
“…that the ability of consumers to make rational decisions is diminished in the older group (Verhaeghen et al.,1993; Loo, 2000; Ellen et al., 2007) while other studies suggest that the older group make more rational and intuitive decisions than the younger group (Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007).”
BackgroundÇevik, Y. D., Tepgeç, M., Mumcu, F., Somyürek, S., & Dağhan, G. (2020) · Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama · doi:10.17943/etku.715980 · Cited by 1
Het nemen van beslissingen door volwassenen met ADHD: een systematisch literatuuronderzoek
Ariesen, A. D., Bangma, D. F., Fuermaier, A. B. M., Tucha, O. M., & Koerts, J. (2020) · Neuropraxis · doi:10.1007/s12474-020-00258-z · Cited by 1
Ramchandran, K., Fiedorowicz, J. G., Chen, Z., Bu, Y., Bechara, A., & Andreasen, N. C. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0238774 · Cited by 1
“T-test analyses were done to compare the PPS and HMC groups on their performance on the DOI, including the IGT score.”
MethodInfluentialHendijani, R. (2021) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2021.101778 · Cited by 2
Susantho, A. H., & Agustine, R. (2022) · Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pembangunan dan Pendidikan Vokasi Pertanian · doi:10.47687/snppvp.v3i1.320 · Cited by 1
Perspectives on judgment and decision making as a skill
Dhami, M. K., Schlottmann, A., Waldmann, M. R., Shanteau, J., Wallsten, T. S., Fischhoff, B., Levin, I. P., Weller, J. A., Bossard, E., Reyna, V. F., et al. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139015684.018 · Cited by 1
Self-citationOsorio, F. A. H. (2012) · Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) · Cited by 1
Family, Faith/Religion, and African Americans' Decisions to Seek Lung Cancer Treatment
Williams, C. D. (2014) · ScholarWorks (Walden University) · Cited by 1
IOOB Already Takes JDM Seriously, but Is It Reciprocated?
Hayes, T. L., & Wooldridge, J. D. (2010) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01259.x · Cited by 1
“…hig there is also a lack of criterion utilization in JDM. Typical examples would be two recent and otherwise interesting empirical papers (Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007; Stanovich & West, 2008) where the criteria were self-report measures that might accurately be referred to as manipulation checks…”
ResultInvestigating Balanced Time Perspective in Adults across the Life Span
Pichayayothin, N. B. (2014) · doi:10.33915/etd.6418 · Cited by 1
“, 1994), decision-making outcomes (Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007), and subjective health (Lawton et al., 1982). Time-related variables were included to examine the construct validity of Mello and Worrell’s (2012) Time Attitude Scale: future time perspective; focusing on opportunities and focus on limitations (Lemaster…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialToma de decisiones en sistemas dinámicos no lineales: una perspectiva psicosociológica
Carrillo, E. C. B. (2016) · UVaDOC UVaDOC University of Valladolid Documentary Repository (University of Valladolid) · doi:10.35376/10324/16403 · Cited by 2
Perceived Self-Efficacy and Dispositional Optimism in Leaders' Behavioral Escalation of Commitment
Babatunde, A. Y. (2016) · ScholarWorks (Walden University) · Cited by 1
The effect of environmental factors on the human behavior in game like environments
Svensson, R. J. (2016) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 1
Following Advice Because it's Been Paid For: Age, the Sunk-Cost Fallacy, and Loss Aversion
Schlosnagle, L. (2011) · The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) · doi:10.33915/etd.4783 · Cited by 1
“…fallacy among younger adults utilized hypothetical sunk costs that were not chosen by the research participants (i.e.; participants were told to imagine that they had already made hypothetical initial investments; e.g. Arkes & Hutzel, 103 2000; Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007; Strough et al., 2008).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialEffect of Payment on User Engagement in MOOCsPreprint
Goli, A., Chintagunta, P. K., & Sriram, S. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3414406 · Cited by 1
Riaz, M. N. (2015) · Cited by 1
What Age Do You Feel? - Subjective Age and Economic BehaviorsPreprint
Ye, Z., & Post, T. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3236603 · Cited by 1
“Likewise, cognitive aging, driven by an interplay of changes in crystalized and fluid intelligence, has been found to explain economic decision making quality (Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007; Korniotis and Kumar, 2011; Li et al., 2013; Bruine de Bruin, 2016; Eberhardt et al., 2017).”
Batool, U., & Siddiqui, D. A. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3641604 · Cited by 2
Eliciting Individuals’ Financial Decision-Making Approaches with Verbal ProtocolsPreprint
Post, T. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3763784 · Cited by 1
Individual Differences in Intelligence and Personality Guide Human Social LearningPreprint
Fay, N., Gignac, G. E., & Walker, B. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/qdpbm · Cited by 1
Representing and Predicting Everyday BehaviorPreprint
Singh, M., Richie, R., & Bhatia, S. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/kb53h · Cited by 1
Age and Gender Differences in Decision-Making Style Profiles
Delaney, R. K. (2014) · doi:10.33915/etd.5465 · Cited by 1
Barbey, A. K. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay4327 · Cited by 1
The role of heuristics in entrepreneurial decision - making
Croft, K. (2013) · UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) · Cited by 1
Afghan Decision-Making in a Development Context
Stent, D. (2021) · FHSU Scholars Repository (Fort Hays State University) · doi:10.58809/wvuz9808 · Cited by 1
Human Intelligence and the Connectome are Driven by Structural Brain Network ControlPreprint
Anderson, E. D., Varshney, L. R., Hemmatian, B., Robles-Granda, P., Nayak, A. K., Wilcox, R. R., Zwilling, C. E., Kim, B., & Barbey, A. K. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.08.02.551642 · Cited by 1
Aluja, A., Balada, F., Garcı́a, L. F., & Garcia, O. (2024) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202407.0015.v1 · Cited by 1
The Forecasting Proficiency Test: A General Use Assessment of Forecasting AbilityPreprint
Himmelstein, M., Zhu, S. M., Petrov, N., Karger, E., Helmer, J., Livnat, S., Bennett, A., Hedley, P., & Tetlock, P. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/a7kdx · Cited by 1
Individual differences in intelligence and personality guide human social learning
Burtenshaw, T., Walker, B., Gignac, G., Grueter, C. C., & Fay, N. (2026) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2026.113639
Andringa, S., Poulston, J., & Pernecky, T. (2013) · Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology)
Cognitive Control in Goal-Directed Decision Making
Rondeel, E. W. M. (2013) · Radboud Repository (Radboud University)
PROBLEM SOLVING AND THE PUBLIC SCHOOL PRINCIPAL
Landis, J., Heasley, R. B., & Ph., D. (2009)
Decision Making Skills Among Individuals with Disorders of Affect Regulation
Osterman, C. K. (2011) · doi:10.14418/wes01.1.666
“The DOI (Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007) is a selfreport measure of avoiding negative decision outcomes.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialIdentifying the Effects of Unjustified Confidence versus Overconfidence
Parker, A. M., & Stone, E. R. (2010)
Self-citationDevelopmental mechanisms influencing decision-making
Escalante-Mead, P. R. (2009) · St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository)
Jacobson, D. (2011) · Scholars' Bank (University of Oregon)
The effectiveness of electronic word of mouth in the hospital care industry
Stelea, T. N. (2014)
Figuring Kids' Allowance and Other Conversion Problems: Commentary on Judgment by the Numbers
Greene, E. (2011) · Journal of Empirical Legal Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01223.x
Decision Making Practices in the Universities of Pakistan (A Comparative Study)
Naz, B. A., Zaman, A., Ghaffar, A., Ameen, F., Ali, U., & Iqbal, J. (2013)
Corso di Laurea magistrale in Amministrazione, finanza e controllo
Accademico, A. (2013)
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú Departamento de Psicología
de Psicología, R., Thorne, C., Criado, R., Cueto, S., Arbulú, M. D. L. F., Stein, R. L., de Ramírez, M. R., Ragúz, M., León, R. G., Martínez, P. G., et al. (2010) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
A Process Model of Judging and Deciding
Leise, C. (2013)
Yetişkinlerde yaşam pişmanliklari ve memnuniyeti
Pethtel, O. L., & Chen, Y. (2014)
Pensamiento crítico: Reflexión sobre su lugar en
Franco, R. M. (2014)
The interaction of patience and resistance to miserly information processing on life outcomes
Kirkman, T. (2014) · JMU Scholoraly Commons (James Madison University)
Beyond rationality : how individual differences result in suboptimal choices
Bogaerts, T. (2014) · Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)
Food preference segmentation using an AIDS mixture: An application to the UKPreprint
Kehlbacher, A., Arnoult, M. H., Srinivasan, C. S., McCloy, R., & Tiffin, R. (2015) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.205461
Sordi, J. D. (2011) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)
Factors Influencing Choice of Mortgages between FRM and ARM: A Comparison of Koreans and Americans
You, S.-Y., & 박주영 (2015) · Journal of Consumption Culture · doi:10.17053/jcc.2015.18.1.008
Basel, J. S. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2360656
Prince, A. L. (2015) · ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) · doi:10.25777/87mx-z895
Chaidaecha, ท. ช. T. (2015) · วารสารวิชาการและวิจัยสังคมศาสตร์ (SOCIAL SCIENCES RESEARCH AND ACADEMIC JOURNAL)
Psychological and Biological Roots of Open-Mindedness
Lambie, J. (2014) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137301055_10
Learning of judgment and decision-making strategies
Mata, R., Mata, R., & Rieskamp, J. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139015684.011
Panichi-Raimondi, M. (2016) · Seton Hall University eRepository (Seton Hall University)
Fostering Entrepreneurship at the Spanish University
Pastor, I., Blanco, A. I., Pacios, A. R., Acosta, A., Pontón, P., & Eraso, Á. G. B. (2015) · Advances in electronic government, digital divide, and regional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9567-2.ch031
“Authors such as Bruin et al. (2007) indicated that research on female entrepreneurship has been based on the general framework of entrepreneurship, which ignores the key elements found when differential characteristics or obstacles are considered in the analysis.”
BackgroundKoffuor, G. A., Abruquah, A. A., Rauf, A., Agyapong, T., & Amoa-Gyarteng, Y. (2016) · International Journal of Health & Allied Sciences · doi:10.4103/2278-344x.194132
“It is therefore assumed that the preference for orthodox or herbal products for the less endowed is influenced by their limited knowledge base and economic viability.([13]) Majority of respondents had secondary school education, and therefore were adequately enlightened to make informed decisions on medications based…”
BackgroundReal-World Outcomes y pensamiento crítico: análisis diferencial por área y género
Franco, A., & Almeida, L. S. (2015) · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Magessi, N. T., & Antunes, L. (2016) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-1756-6.ch001
Welk, A. K., & Mayhorn, C. B. (2015) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931215591065
“Findings from this study identified that working memory capacity was positively related to performance on cognitively demanding decision-making tasks that required the critical evaluation of information and the selection of an optimal option, such as the “Applying Decision Rules” task from the Adult Decision Making Co…”
MethodExamining the Effect of Cognitive Style in Individuals' Technology Use Decision Making
Manar, A. H. (2012) · University of Palestine Digital Repository
Warnecke, S. (2017) · eDiss (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) · doi:10.53846/goediss-6195
Eberhardt (2018) · Research Publications (Maastricht University) · doi:10.26481/dis.20180420we
“Cronbach’s alpha was quite low due to the small number of items (Table 4.1), but previous research showed that the overall measure was reliable and valid (Bruine de Bruin et al. 2007).”
InfluentialAmiri, S., & Azad-Marzabadi, E. (2018) · Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.5812/ijpbs.12527
How Do Individuals View Their Own Experiences with Risky Sexual Behaviour?: A Narrative Inquiry
Moore, E. L. (2012) · ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta) · doi:10.7939/r3r648
Development and Validation study of the Consumer Value Consciousness Scale
임혜빈, 한승훈, Lee, B., & 정지나 (2018) · The Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology · doi:10.21074/kjlcap.2018.19.4.657
A Behavioral Theory of Human Capital Integration
Christensen, J. L. (2018) · Econstor (Econstor)
ADAPTIVE FEEDBACK BASED ON CONCEPT MAP AND CONFIDENCE INFORMATION
Pailai, J. (2019) · Hiroshima University Acedemic Information Repository (Hiroshima University)
Quicksand or Bedrock for Behavioral Economics? Assessing Foundational Empirical QuestionsPreprint
Stango, V., Yoong, J., & Zinman, J. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3004116
Numeracy and logical abilities in cognitive heuristics and biases
Ceschi, A., Dorofeeva, K., & Sartori, R. (2013)
Nieistotne alternatywy wyboru mają znaczenie. Przegląd wiedzy o efekcie asymetrycznej dominacji
Kościelniak, M., & Tyszka, T. (2019) · Decyzje · doi:10.7206/dec.1733-0092.123
Three essays based on Experimental Economics: incentives and risk
Herranz‐Zarzoso, N. (2019) · Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) · doi:10.6035/14102.2019.366685
Weller, J. A. (2017) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2017.1346521
Women and GovernancePreprint
Acharya, K. (2010) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3764865
Zikrinawati, K. (2019) · Psychopolytan Jurnal Psikologi · doi:10.36341/psi.v3i1.935 · Cited by 3
ОСОБИСТІСНІ ДИСПОЗИЦІІ У СТРУКТУРІ ПРИИНЯТТЯ РІШЕННЯ ОСІБ, ЗАЛЕЖНИХ ВІД ПСИХОАКТИВНИХ РЕЧОВИН
Darvishov, N. (2020) · International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science · doi:10.31435/rsglobal_ijitss/31032020/7014 · Cited by 1
The young male hypothesis of risk-taking behavior
Mitsopoulou, E. (2019) · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton)
du Preez, M. M., Kriek, H. S., & Albright, J. (2020) · Research on emotion in organizations · doi:10.1108/s1746-979120200000016016 · Cited by 1
Financial decision making in late adulthood
Hohn, S. (2020) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.204292
Geisler, M., Allwood, C. M., & Salo, I. (2020) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1111/hsc.13207
“That is, by reversing the order of Steps 3 and 4 information about the predictive overlap between the two steps is provided (cf. Bruine de Bruin et al., 2007, Table 6).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B.
- Affiliations
- RAND Corporation (US)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 938-956
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2039223548
- Semantic Scholar
- 22168bbc83ed5c1b933d71c3f881dc85b0709321
- Cited by
- 906
- References
- 110
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 12.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- KiltHub Repository
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (SES-0213782)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- individual differences, construct validity, predictive validity, socioeconomic status, cognitive ability, decision-making styles, negative life events
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aptitude, Culture, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Individuality, Intelligence, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Problem Solving, Psychometrics, Self Concept, Social Values, Socioeconomic Factors, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
