Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,193Advanced Statistical Methods and ModelsStatistical Methods and ApplicationsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression.

Budescu, David V.·1993·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

Whenever multiple regression is used to test and compare theoretically motivated models, it is of interest to determine the relative importance of the predictors. Specifically, researchers seek to rank order and scale variables in terms of their importance and to express global statistics of the model as a function of these measures. This article reviews the many meanings of importance of predictors in multiple regression, highlights their weaknesses, and proposes a new method for comparing variables: dominance analysis. Dominance is a qualitative relation defined in a pairwise fashion: One variable is said to dominate another if it is more useful than its competitor in all subset regressions. Properties of the newly proposed method are described and illustrated

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.542

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Budescu, D. V.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Budescu, David V.
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
1993-11
Volume
114
Issue
3
Pages
542-551
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2085175893
Cited by
1,193
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 81 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 105 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 50
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
dominance analysis, multiple linear regression, feature ranking, variable scaling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.