The DOI matches its Crossref record; 204 of the 205 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“All tests of intelligence or cognitive aptitude are optimal performance assessments, whereas measures of thinking dispositions are often assessed under typical performance conditions (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997;Cacioppo, Petty, Feinstein, & Jarvis, 1996;Norris & Ennis, 1989;Perkins, 1995;Sternberg, 2003;Zeidner & Matthews, 2000).”
From The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks (2011) · cites this paper as Cacioppo, Petty, Feinstein, & Jarvis, 1996
Citations
Cites
Items 201–204 of 204
Apprehension about Communication and the Need for Cognition
Wycoff, E. B. (1992) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1992.75.3f.1225 · Cited by 5
Refinement and validation of Brickman's measure of internal-external correspondence
Ickes, W. J., & Teng, G. K. (1987) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/0092-6566(87)90012-2 · Cited by 3
Face memory and spontaneous personality processing
Mueller, J. H., Keller, T., & Dandoy, A. C. (1989) · Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society · doi:10.3758/bf03329909 · Cited by 2
Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe - Crowne Social Desirability Scale
Reynolds, W. M. (1982) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 205 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
Frederick, S. (2005) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533005775196732 · Cited by 5,256
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00003435 · Cited by 4,481
“…for cognition – a dispositional variable reflecting the tendency toward thoughtful analysis and reflective thinking – has been associated with aspects of epistemic and practical rationality (Cacioppo et al. 1996; Kardash & Scholes 1996; Klaczynski et al. 1997; Smith & Levin 1996; Verplanken 1993).”
On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.4.864 · Cited by 4,069
Self-citationGawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692 · Cited by 2,756
The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review
Lindquist, K. A., Wager, T. D., Kober, H., Bliss-Moreau, E., & Barrett, L. F. (2012) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x11000446 · Cited by 2,320
“University of Geneva, on 20 Oct 2017 at 14:48:49, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. in Cacioppo et al. (1996), Levine and Perlovsky (2008; 2010), Perlovsky (2009b; 2010c), and Perlovsky et al. (2010), and emotions related to creativity…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 197-253
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2023292494
- Semantic Scholar
- d13228e21efe9e9e7dac888d5b41e0d705f924df
- Cited by
- 2,517
- References
- 205
- Citations by year
- 2026: 78 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 153 · 2019: 150 · 2018: 125 · 2017: 136 · 2016: 118 · 2015: 115 · 2014: 106 · 2013: 115 · 2012: 129
- FWCI
- 30.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- need for cognition, cognitive motivation, individual differences, personality traits, cognitive effort
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
